Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Atheroscler Thromb ; 31(2): 122-134, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37704431

RESUMEN

AIM: Omega-3 fatty acids have emerged as a new option for controlling the residual risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) in the statin era. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) is associated with reduced CAD risk in the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention trial, whereas the Statin Residual Risk with Epanova in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia trial that used the combination EPA/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has failed to derive any clinical benefit. These contradictory results raise important questions about whether investigating the antiatherosclerotic effect of omega-3 fatty acids could help to understand their significance for CAD-risk reduction. METHODS: The Attempts at Plaque Vulnerability Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Noncontrast T1-weighted Technic EPA/DHA study is a single-center, triple-arm, randomized, controlled, open-label trial used to investigate the effect of EPA/DHA on high-risk coronary plaques after 12 months of treatment, detected using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with CAD receiving statin therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to no-treatment, 2-g/day, and 4-g/day EPA/DHA groups. The primary endpoint was the change in the plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio (PMR) of coronary high-intensity plaques detected by CMR. Coronary plaque assessment using computed tomography angiography (CTA) was also investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 84 patients (mean age: 68.2 years, male: 85%) who achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of <100 mg/dL were enrolled. The PMR was reduced in each group over 12 months. There were no significant differences in PMR changes among the three groups in the primary analysis or analysis including total lesions. The changes in CTA parameters, including indexes for detecting high-risk features, also did not differ. CONCLUSION: The EPA/DHA therapy of 2 or 4 g/day did not significantly improve the high-risk features of coronary atherosclerotic plaques evaluated using CMR under statin therapy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3 , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Placa Aterosclerótica , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Placa Aterosclerótica/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácidos Docosahexaenoicos , Ácido Eicosapentaenoico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/uso terapéutico
2.
J Cardiol ; 76(1): 35-43, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389534

RESUMEN

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the risk of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while oral anticoagulants are superior to antiplatelet therapy for preventing thromboembolic events, including ischemic stroke, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Reportedly, the AF population accounts for approximately 5 to 10% of patients undergoing PCI. From a theoretical viewpoint, combination therapy of DAPT and oral anticoagulation was previously recommended in patients with AF undergoing PCI. However, long-term triple therapy carries the risk of major bleeding. Recent clinical trials (WOEST, PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, AUGUSTUS, and ENTRUST AF-PCI trials) demonstrated the advantage of dual therapy with an oral anticoagulant (warfarin or direct oral anticoagulant) plus an antiplatelet agent, which decreased the rate of major bleeding in the acute phase in AF patients who underwent PCI. These results affected guidelines, which now recommend that the duration of triple therapy should be limited, and dual therapy should be considered an alternative regimen when considering the bleeding risk. The current guidelines recommend monotherapy with an oral anticoagulant after 12 months of combination therapy, or in patients with AF and stable coronary artery diseases not requiring intervention. However, this approach has yet to be validated by randomized, controlled trials. Recently, the AFIRE trial demonstrated that rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to dual therapy in terms of efficacy and superior in terms of safety in this population. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that there has been a paradigm shift in antithrombotic therapy to a "less is more" regimen. This article reviews current evidence and focuses on the optimal approach to antithrombotic treatment in patients with AF undergoing PCI in acute and chronic/stable phases.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Trombosis/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA