Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nat Med ; 77(2): 343-351, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36694038

RESUMEN

Pancreatic cancer is associated with a poor prognosis; thus, there is an urgent need to develop new and effective treatments. Ingenol mebutate (IM), which is isolated from the latex of Euphorbia peplus, was recently shown to be effective against pancreatic cancer cell lines; however, its mechanism of action has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we focused on the less drug-sensitive pancreatic cancer cell line Panc-1 and compared IM to commercially available anticancer drugs using cell survival assays. In addition, we aimed to identify novel biomolecules that may be involved in the mechanism of action of IM using RNA sequencing, western blotting, and inhibition assays. The IC50 values after 72 h of exposure to IM and SN-38, drugs to which the Panc-1 cells are most sensitive among the tested anticancer agents, were 43.1 ± 16.8 nM and 165 ± 37 nM, respectively. IM showed a cytostatic effect equal to or greater than that of the clinically used pancreatic cancer therapeutic drugs. RNA sequencing and protein expression analysis revealed that expression of stimulator of interferon genes (STING) increased at low IM concentration, whereas cell viability decreased. Co-exposure of IM and STING inhibitor, H-151, to Panc-1 or MIA PaCa-2 cell lines canceled the growth-inhibitory effects of IM alone. In conclusion, IM may have an efficacy comparable to that of existing pancreatic cancer therapeutic agents on the less drug-sensitive Panc-1 cell line and the immune-related molecule STING plays a role in the mechanism of action of IM.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Euphorbia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 6561, 2022 04 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35449143

RESUMEN

The association between capecitabine efficacy and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is controversial. Here, we determined whether co-administration of PPIs affects the real-world effectiveness of capecitabine. This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) who received adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy or CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) between January 2009 and December 2014 at nine participating institutions. The primary endpoint was the difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) between patients who received PPIs and those who did not and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. Multivariable analysis of RFS and OS was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, propensity score adjustment, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses. Data from 606 patients were evaluated, 54 of whom had received a PPI. PPI-treated patients tended to have poorer RFS and OS than patients treated without PPIs. The hazard ratio for RFS with capecitabine monotherapy was 2.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.22-5.07). These results were consistent with sensitivity analyses performed using propensity score adjustment and IPTW methods. Co-administration of PPIs may reduce the effectiveness of capecitabine and negatively impact patients with stage II-III CRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Cancer ; 6(5): 464-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25874010

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for discontinuing tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil potassium (S-1) adjuvant chemotherapy following gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients with curatively-resected gastric cancer who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. S-1 was administered orally at 80-120 mg/day, depending on body surface area, on days 1-28 every 6 weeks for 1 year. The dose and treatment schedule were modified at the clinicians' discretion, according to toxicity. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included in the study, 26 of whom discontinued S-1 therapy. The relapse-free survival rates in the S-1-completed and S-1-discontinuation groups at 5 years post-surgery were 88.1% and 55.8%, respectively. The overall survival rates in the S-1-completed and S-1-discontinuation groups at 5 years post-surgery were 89.4% and 59.8%, respectively. The hazard ratios for relapse and death were significantly lower in the S-1-completed group compared with those in the S-1-discontinuation group (0.18; p<0.001 and 0.19; p=0.002, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that S-1 discontinuation was significantly associated with an initial overdose of S-1, having stage I cancer, creatinine clearance <66 mL/min, and a side effect of nausea. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that assessing renal function to avoid initial overdose of S-1, together with the early management of side effects, may support the continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

4.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 128(4): 657-61, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18379184

RESUMEN

Infections caused by multiple-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP) are a clinically significant problem. We reported here the effective use of combination therapy in a patient with infection caused by MDRP according to an interventional treatment strategy suggested by a pharmacist. The patient was a 70-year-old male who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. On day 45 after transplant, MDRP was newly isolated from urine, but the diagnosis at that time was colonization. On day 61, the patient developed a fever (> or =38.0 degrees C). In addition, laboratory data showed that C-reactive protein (CRP) was also increased. At the medical team conference, the pharmacist proposed the following treatment strategy for this infection. Aztreonam and amikacin were intravenously administered at doses of 2 g/day and 800 mg/day, respectively. The subsequent clinical course was well controlled, but the infection recurred and was aggravated. Aztreonam and ciprofloxacin were then intravenously administered at doses of 4 g/day and 600 mg/day, respectively, resulting in the alleviation of fever in the patient as well as a decrease in CRP and disappearance of MDRP isolates from urine on day 67; that is, MDRP infection was consequently well controlled. In conclusion, the combination therapy between aztreonam and amikacin, or ciprofloxacin may be clinically useful for severe infections of MDRP in compromised hosts.


Asunto(s)
Amicacina/administración & dosificación , Aztreonam/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Esquema de Medicación , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA