Factors associated with spontaneous vaginal birth in nulliparous women: A descriptive systematic review.

PROBLEM: Spontaneous vaginal birth (SVB) rates for nulliparous women are declining internationally. BACKGROUND: There is inadequate understanding of factors affecting this trend overall and limited large-scale responses to improve women's opportunity to birth spontaneously. AIM: To undertake a descriptive systematic review identifying factors associated with spontaneous vaginal birth at term, in nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy. METHODS: Quantitative studies of all designs, of nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation, who experienced a SVB at term were included. Nine databases were searched (inception to October 2022). Two reviewers undertook quality appraisal; Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) with high risk of bias (ROB 2.0) and other designs with (QATSDD) scoring ≤ 50% were excluded. FINDINGS: Data were abstracted from 90 studies (32 RCTs, 39 cohort, 9 cross-sectional, 4 prevalence, 5 case control, 1 quasi-experimental). SVB rates varied (13%-99%). Modifiable factors associated with SVB included addressing fear of childbirth, low impact antenatal exercise, maternal positioning during second-stage labour and midwifery led care. Complexities arising during pregnancy and regional analgesia were shown to decrease SVB and other interventions, such as routine induction of labour were equivocal. DISCUSSION: Antenatal preparation (low impact exercise, childbirth education, addressing fear of childbirth) may increase SVB, as does midwifery continuity-of-care. Intrapartum strategies to optimise labour progression emerged as promising areas for further research. CONCLUSION: Declining SVB rates may be improved through multi-factorial approaches inclusive of maternal, fetal and clinical care domains. However, the variability of SVB rates testifies to the complexity of the issue.

Perineal repair performed by midwives in Australia: A cross-sectional survey study of education and practice.

PROBLEM: Perineal repair is generally not a widely practiced skill amongst Australian midwives, the reasons for this are uncertain and may result in technique variations. BACKGROUND: Many birthing women experience perineal tears that require suturing. As midwives attend the majority of vaginal births, they would be ideally placed to undertake perineal repair. AIM: To describe the current level of midwifery perineal repair skill acquisition, knowledge, techniques and utilization by Australian midwives. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to Australian College of Midwives members and shared via social media. Data on demographics, suturing techniques, reasons why midwives did or did not suture and barriers to skill acquisition were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables including percentages, mean, standard deviation, median and range as appropriate. FINDINGS: 375 completed surveys were received between April and May 2023. 197 midwives indicated current suturing practice and 178 did not suture. Contributing to continuity of care was the most common motivating factor. The use of a continuous suturing technique for all layers of a perineal injury was reported by the majority of suturing midwives. There was greater variation in the management of labial tears. Low numbers of skilled midwives to support attaining competency and high workloads were the main barriers to attaining suturing skills. DISCUSSION: Australian midwives view perineal suturing as a valid midwifery skill that can contribute to continuity of care. Largely organisational barriers exist to skill development and greater utilisation. CONCLUSION: Perineal repair should be prioritised as a fundamental midwifery skill.

Woman-centred care and integrated electronic medical records within Australian maternity settings: Point prevalence audit and observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Transition to paperless records brings new challenges to midwifery practice across the continuum of woman-centred care. There is limited and conflicting evidence on the relative benefits of electronic medical records in maternity settings. This article aims to inform the use of integrative electronic medical records within the maternity services' environment with attention to the midwife-woman relationship. DESIGN: This descriptive two-part study includes 1) an audit of electronic records in the early period following implementation (2-time points); and 2) an observational study to observe midwives' practice relating to electronic record use. SETTING: Two regional tertiary public hospitals PARTICIPANTS: Midwives providing care for childbearing women across antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal areas. FINDINGS: 400 integrated electronic medical records were audited for completeness. Most fields had high levels of complete data in the correct location. However, between time 1 (T1) and time 2 (T2), persistent missing data (foetal heart rate documented 30 minutely T1 36%; T2 42%), and incomplete or incorrectly located data (pathology results T1:63%; T2 54%; perineal repair T1 60%; T2 46%) were identified. Observationally, midwives were actively engaged with the integrative electronic medical record between 23% to 68% (median 46%; IQR 16) of the time. CONCLUSION: Midwives spent a significant amount of time completing documentation during clinical episodes of care. Largely, this documentation was found to be accurate, yet exceptions to data completeness, precision and location remained, indicating some concerns with software usability. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Time-intensive monitoring and documentation may hinder woman-centred midwifery care.

Nurturing our new midwives: A qualitative enquiry of mentor's experiences of supporting new graduate midwives working in continuity of care models.

PROBLEM: Limited opportunity exists for new graduates in Australia to be employed in continuity of care midwifery models. AIM: To explore the perspectives of midwifery mentors supporting new graduate midwives employed in continuity of care models. METHODS: An interpretive, qualitative study was conducted. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with senior midwifery staff who mentored new graduate midwives during their transition to practice within a continuity of care model were undertaken. Digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, data were thematically analysed. Data collection ceased once theoretical saturation had been achieved. NVIVO software was used to assist with coding and data management. FINDINGS: Twelve mentors participated. Mentors provided valuable feedback to optimise the supportive mechanisms to enable the success of the rotation of new graduate midwives in continuity of care models during their transition to practice period. Three key themes were constructed, including: Getting it right in the first place; Nurturing our new midwives; and The cultural void. DISCUSSION: Consistent with the wider literature, effective implementation, sound support structures and wider acceptance of new graduate midwives transitioning to practice within continuity of care models is crucial to its success and sustainability. CONCLUSION: Mentors are responsible to nurture, respect and guide new midwives through this crucial period, as they transition from midwifery student to registered midwife. Mentors believe in the transition of new graduate midwives in continuity of care models.

New graduate midwives' transition to practice: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To map and synthesise the literature underpinning the transition to practice for new graduate midwives internationally, with a focus on continuity of care and traditional transition to practice models. DESIGN: Scoping review of the literature METHODS: Relevant databases were searched to identify primary research studies. Key words, Boolean terms, and an inclusion/exclusion criterion were used to extrapolate key pieces of research. All study types and methods published in English between 2008 - May 2021 that met the inclusion criteria were considered. FINDINGS: 20 studies met inclusion criteria. These were conducted in Australia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand. New graduate midwives' value structured rotations and feel very supported in continuity models, where strong mentorship and support are offered. Within this context confidence was promoted as a new practitioner. Upholding woman-centred care in busy hospital environments was a key challenge. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Emerging literature indicates new graduate midwives' transition optimally within a continuity model, however more research is needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Transitioning midwives into practice within continuity of care midwifery models may address workforce attrition and enhance early career midwife confidence.

Impact of Electronic Medical Records Within the Maternity Environment: An Ethnographic Exploration of Midwifery Practice.

Integration of care through digitalisation of paper records is important for childbearing women who may see multiple clinicians both within the hospital and the community. It is important that in the implementation of an EMR, the established benefits of a paper and handheld records are transferred and not lost. Acceptance and positive use of digital records in maternity settings has occurred despite concerns regarding workload interrupting women centred care.

Maternity health professionals' perspectives of cord clamp timing, cord blood banking and cord blood donation: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Parents today have several options for the management of their infant's cord blood during the third stage of labour. Parents can choose to have their infant's cord clamped early or to have deferred cord clamping. If the cord is clamped early, cord blood can be collected for private cord blood banking or public cord blood donation for use later if needed. If cord clamping is deferred, the placental blood physiologically transfuses to the neonate and there are physiological advantages to this. These benefits include a smoother cardiovascular transition and increased haemoglobin levels while not interfering with the practice of collecting cord blood for gases if needed. The aim of this study is to explore Australian maternity health professionals' perspectives towards cord clamp timing, cord blood banking and cord blood donation. METHODS: Fourteen maternity health professionals (midwives and obstetricians) from both private and public practice settings in Australia participated in semi-structured interviews either in person or by telephone. Interviews were transcribed and data analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Overall there was strong support for deferred cord clamping, and this was seen as important and routinely discussed with parents as part of antenatal care. However, support did not extend to the options of cord blood banking and donation and to routinely informing parents of these options even when these were available at their birthing location. CONCLUSION: Formalised education for maternity health professionals is needed about the benefits and implications of cord blood banking and cord blood donation so that they have the confidence to openly discuss all options of cord clamp timing, cord blood banking and cord blood donation to facilitate informed decision-making by parents.

Implementation and upscaling of midwifery continuity of care: The experience of midwives and obstetricians.

PROBLEM: Despite high quality evidence supporting midwifery continuity of care, access to this model is limited in many parts of Australia and internationally. BACKGROUND: The models of care provided to women have a strong influence on their perinatal experience and clinical outcomes. Midwifery Continuity of Care (CoC) is arguably the most significant factor in enhancing women's clinical outcomes during child-bearing and facilitating a positive childbirth experience. Health system change is required, yet little literature has detailed the actualisation of this in the context of upscaling midwifery CoC. RESEARCH QUESTION/AIM: This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of midwifery and obstetric staff during the implementation and upscaling of midwifery CoC within a regional hospital and health service in coastal Queensland, Australia. METHODS: A single-site, qualitative enquiry. Obstetricians and midwives participated in semi-structured interviews or focus groups at two-time points: within 2 months of introduction of the CoC service (obstetricians n=6; midwives n=15); and 2-years after implementation (obstetricians n=5; midwives n=17). Data were analysed thematically. FINDINGS: Four key themes and several categories were generated from the data: hopes and expectations; clinical and practice changes; organisational and structural change; and, future directions. DISCUSSION: Organisational culture, structural change, communication processes and collaborative relationships can be used to inform future scale-up and sustain midwifery caseload care. Specifically, communication, inter-disciplinary collegial relationships, and managerial support are crucial to the sustainability and ultimate upscaling of caseload midwifery care. CONCLUSION: System change is challenging, but in order to improve access to midwifery CoC is necessary.

How midwives manage rapid pre-loading of fluid in women prior to low dose epidurals: A retrospective chart review.

AIM: To describe contemporary routine practice regarding rapid pre-loading of intravenous fluid management prior to epidural analgesia during labour and birth. BACKGROUND: Midwives are the key health professionals providing care for women before, during and after an epidural in labour. Part of this management involves maternal hydration; however, how midwives assess and manage maternal hydration and fluid management is not well understood. Prior to the administration of a low dose epidural for pain relief a rapid intravenous pre-loading of between 500-1000 mls of crystalloid fluids is administered to the pregnant women. Currently, there is limited evidence available to assess if intravenous pre-loading reduces maternal hypotension and foetal bradycardia. Anecdotal evidence suggests that wide variation in clinical practice in relation to volume of fluid administered, fluid status assessment and clinical documentation occurs. DESIGN: A retrospective medical health record review, in a regional Australian maternity hospital. METHODS: A retrospective medical health record review chart review from women who received an epidural for pain relief during labour and birth (June-September 2015). RESULTS: Data from 293 charts were collected, including: maternal factors; blood pressure distributions; maternal fluid status; types, concentration and timing of analgesia loading doses; IV fluid loading volumes; maternal hypotension, foetal outcomes and documentation of fluid balance charts. Wide variation in clinical practice was evident with midwives administering pre-loading fluid volumes ranging from 250-1000 ml. Midwifery assessment, documentation and practice pertaining to hydration was inconsistent and lacking. CONCLUSION: Management of intravenous fluids during labour is fragmented. Although fluid balance charts are used internationally to assess maternal hydration, documentation of fluid balance status was poor. Multi-professional collaboration between obstetrics, anaesthetics and midwifery is required to address this wide variation and reach consensus on best practice based on what evidence is currently available.

The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Midwife facilitated, group models of antenatal care have emerged as an alternative to conventional care both within Australia and internationally. Group antenatal care can be offered in a number of different ways, however usually constitutes a series of sessions co-ordinated by a midwife combining physical assessment, antenatal education and peer support in a group setting. Midwife-led group antenatal care is viewed positively by expectant mothers, with no associated adverse outcomes identified in the published literature for women or their babies when compared with conventional care. Evidence of an improvement in outcomes is limited. The aim of this study was to compare mode of birth (any vaginal birth with caesarean birth) between pregnant women accessing midwife-led group antenatal care and conventional individual antenatal care, in Queensland, Australia. METHODS: This was a retrospective matched cohort study, set within a collaborative antenatal clinic between the local university and regional public health service in Queensland, Australia. Midwife-led group antenatal care (n = 110) participants were compared with controls enrolled in conventional antenatal care (n = 330). Groups were matched by parity, maternal age and gestation to form comparable groups, selecting a homogeneous sample with respect to confounding variables likely to affect outcomes. RESULTS: There was no evidence that group care resulted in a greater number of caesarean births. The largest increase in the odds of caesarean birth was associated with a previous caesarean birth (p < 0.001), no previous birth (compared with previous vaginal birth) (p < 0.003), and conventional antenatal care (p < 0.073). The secondary outcomes (breastfeeding and infant birth weight) which were examined between the matched cohorts were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence arising from this study that there was a significant difference in mode of birth (caesarean or vaginal) between group and conventional care. Group care was associated with a lower risk of caesarean birth after controlling for previous births, with the highest chance for a vaginal birth being a woman who has had a previous vaginal birth and was in group care. Conversely, the highest risk of caesarean birth was for women who have had a previous caesarean birth and conventional care.