RESUMEN
Osteitis pubis is a rare, inflammatory condition involving the pubic symphysis. While osteitis pubis has been reported following many urological procedures, including those addressing bladder outlet obstruction such as transurethral resection of the prostate, it has never been reported after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Here, we detail the clinical course of a patient found to have osteitis pubis following HoLEP. This patient presented several weeks after surgery with non-specific, persistent symptoms of groin pain and difficulty ambulating, alerting our clinicians to consider osteitis pubis which was confirmed on MRI of the pelvis. While the majority of osteitis pubis cases are managed with locally invasive techniques, our patient's symptoms were successfully managed conservatively with Foley catheter placement, oral antibiotics and close follow-up. At 9 months postoperative, the patient has reported complete resolution of symptoms and continues to be followed closely.
Asunto(s)
Artritis , Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Osteítis , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Osteítis/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteítis/etiología , Hueso Púbico/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Artritis/cirugía , Terapia por Láser/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative outcomes related to sexual and urinary function in patients who underwent a holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with selective laser enucleation of the median lobe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the first 450 HoLEP cases by a single surgeon from April 2019 to March 2022. Fifty-five patients with intravesical-prostatic protrusion or high bladder neck without obstructing lateral lobes underwent selective enucleation of the median lobe of the prostate. Patients were asked to comment on whether they had retrograde ejaculation during their follow-up appointment. Urinary function was assessed using the American Urological Association Symptom Score and subjective evaluation of urinary incontinence. RESULTS: Median age of the cohort was 65 years (range: 44-91). Compared to preoperative, there was significant improvement in mean postoperative American Urological Association Symptom Score (22.5 vs 6.9, P < .001), mean postoperative quality of life scores (4 vs 1.2, P < .001), and mean postoperative post void residual volumes (244.1 vs 69.3 cc, P < .001). No patients reported stress urinary incontinence. Of the 55 patients who underwent selective enucleation of the median lobe, 40 were sexually active. Of those men, 35 reported normal ejaculation, 3 had retrograde ejaculation that was unchanged from pre-op, and 2 had new ejaculatory dysfunction. CONCLUSION: In this case series of selective laser enucleation of the median lobe, urinary function significantly improved in short-term follow-up with preservation of ejaculation in approximately 90% of men.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Eyaculación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , HolmioRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of how surgical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) procedures are compensated in the United States and the implications of the current reimbursement system on the care of patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The resource-based relative value care system is Medicare's current reimbursement model. There is strong evidence that the current system does not adequately account for complex care. Consequently, for BPH surgical procedures, treatment options best suited for complex patients are not adequately reimbursed which may have implications on healthcare delivery and outcomes. SUMMARY: Inadequate reimbursement for certain BPH procedures may disincentivize the care of complex patients. Procedures such a holmium laser enucleation of the prostate are well suited for complex patients but have a steep learning curve. The incentive to learn and offer such procedures to complex patients may be unfairly influenced by reimbursement levels, which in the end penalizes patients and the treatments available to them.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Láser , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Anciano , Humanos , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Masculino , Medicare , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) in treating patients with medically refractory complete urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Between April 2000 and July 2003, 39 patients in urinary retention due to BPH were treated with HE-TUMT. A Foley catheter was reinserted after HE-TUMT and removed at 3 weeks for a voiding trial. Patients unable to void were recatheterized, and voiding trials were repeated at 2-week intervals. Patients were evaluated according to history and physical examination, prostate-specific antigen level, prostate volume, cystourethroscopy, International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, peak uroflow, and postvoid residual. Success was defined as the ability to urinate after HE-TUMT without the need for further intervention. RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) patient age was 72 +/- 9.3 years. Mean follow-up period was 18 +/- 10.2 months. Twenty patients (51%) were characterized as American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or higher. The mean prostate volume was 75.2 +/- 57.6 cm3. The mean length of time that patients were dependent on indwelling Foley catheters before HE-TUMT was 9.6 +/- 14.2 weeks. Thirty-two patients were able to void after HE-TUMT, for an overall success rate of 82%. Patients voiding successfully after HE-TUMT had a mean of 1.6 +/- 0.8 voiding trials and required catheters after HE-TUMT for a mean period of 4.1 +/- 2 weeks. Only 6 (15%) of the patients who were voiding were able to stop their medication for BPH. CONCLUSIONS: We found an encouraging success rate with HE-TUMT in relieving urinary retention in patients with BPH, including those with large prostate volumes. It is an acceptable option for patients who are considered high risk for surgery. Several patients required multiple voiding trials before spontaneous urination, which suggests that improvements in bladder outlet obstruction might require a prolonged period after HE-TUMT. Finally, many patients might require continued use of medications after HE-TUMT.