Association of gastrointestinal events with quality of life and treatment satisfaction in osteoporosis patients: results from the Medication Use Patterns, Treatment Satisfaction, and Inadequate Control of Osteoporosis Study (MUSIC OS).

The purpose of this study was to assess the association of GI events with HRQoL and treatment satisfaction. The effect of baseline GI events persisted through 1 year of follow-up, as indicated by lower EQ-5D, OPAQ-SV, and treatment satisfaction scores among patients with vs without baseline GI events. The presence of GI events is an independent predictor of decreased HRQoL and treatment satisfaction in patients being treated for osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to assess the association of gastrointestinal (GI) events with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction in patients being treated for osteoporosis. METHODS: MUSIC OS was a multinational, prospective, observational study examining the impact of GI events on osteoporosis management in postmenopausal women. In this analysis, HRQoL and treatment satisfaction were assessed at baseline, 6, and 12 months and compared between patients with and without GI events. Covariate-adjusted scores were calculated using multivariate least-squares regression analysis, and differences between the mean scores of patients with and without baseline and post-baseline GI events were determined. RESULTS: Among the 2959 patients in the analysis, unadjusted scores at each time point were lower (i.e., worse) for patients with GI events than patients without GI events. In adjusted analyses, the effect of baseline GI events persisted through 1 year of follow-up, as indicated by lower EQ-5D and OPAQ-SV scores at 12 months among patients with vs without baseline GI events (-0.04 for the EQ-5D utility score, -5.07 for the EQ-5D visual analog scale, -3.35 for OPAQ physical function, -4.60 for OPAQ emotional status, and -8.50 for OPAQ back pain; P ≤ 0.001 for all values). Decrements in month 12 treatment satisfaction scores were -6.46 for patients with baseline GI events and -7.88 for patients with post-baseline GI events. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of GI events is an independent predictor of decreased HRQoL and treatment satisfaction in patients being treated for osteoporosis.

Investigation of a possible interaction between ciprofloxacin and cyclosporine in renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Bacterial infection is a common complication during the first few months after renal transplantation. Ciprofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone broad-spectrum antibiotic, is used frequently in treating infections in the early posttransplant period. Evidence from in vitro studies has suggested that ciprofloxacin can antagonize the cyclosporine (CsA)-dependent inhibition of interleukin-2 production. Such an effect in renal transplant patients could antagonize the immunosuppressive activity of CsA and lead to rejection of the graft. METHODS: To investigate the possibility of a pharmacodynamic interaction between ciprofloxacin and CsA, we conducted a case-control study in 42 patients who had received a kidney transplant and who were prescribed ciprofloxacin in the first 1-6 months after transplantation and in their matched controls (two per case) who did not receive ciprofloxacin during the study period. RESULTS: There was a twofold greater incidence (P=0.008) of ciprofloxacin use at 1-3 months (65%) than was observed at 4-7 months (35%) after transplantation. The proportion of cases experiencing at least one episode of biopsy-proven rejection 1-3 months posttransplant (45%) was significantly greater (P=0.004) than that of controls (19%). Furthermore, there was a marked increase (P<0.001) in the incidence of rejection temporally associated with ciprofloxacin use among cases (29%) compared with that experienced by the controls (2%). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility that ciprofloxacin increases rejection rates in renal transplant patients may be of clinical importance and therefore warrants further investigation.

Safety and efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in correcting the anemia of patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction.

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is effective in correcting anemia in hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and predialysis patients. Limited studies in patients with failing renal allografts suggest a similar efficacy but provide little information concerning benefits, dose requirements, or adverse events. This study examined these considerations in a group of 40 patients (18 men; 22 women) aged 40.3 +/- 13.8 yr with stable, chronic renal allograft failure. All patients had a hemoglobin < 95 g/L and a serum creatinine > 250 mumol/L at baseline. Patients received rHuEPO (50 U/kg sc) three times weekly for 24 wk along with iron po if serum ferritin was < 100 micrograms/L. Mean hemoglobin rose from 78.9 +/- 10.4 to 102.6 +/- 18.4 g/L after 24 wk. Mean rHuEPO dose at 24 wk was 129.8 +/- 81.9 U/kg per week. With oral iron supplementation only, serum ferritin fell throughout the 24 wk, whereas serum iron, transferrin saturation, and total iron-binding capacity remained stable. Quality of life was assessed by use of the general Sickness Impact Profile and the disease-specific Transplant Disease Questionnaire measures at baseline and every 8 wk during rHuEPO therapy. Significant improvement was noted in global Sickness Impact Profile scores and in four of five dimensions of the Transplant Disease Questionnaire. Serious adverse events were infrequent. No change in mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure was noted, although there was a significantly increased need for antihypertensive drugs in 18 patients (P = 0.0002). A significant inverse correlation was noted between baseline renal function and maintenance rHuEPO dose (r = -0.45; P < 0.05). Twelve patients returned to dialysis during the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Removal of aluminum during hemodialysis: effect of different dialyzer membranes.

Aluminum toxicity is now widely recognized as a major cause of morbidity in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Desferrioxamine (DFO) chelation therapy has been suggested as a method of AI removal in such patients, though the most appropriate treatment schedule is yet to be established. In the present study, AI removal following DFO infusion was evaluated using two different dialyzer membranes to test the hypothesis that polyacrilonitrile (PAN) membranes permit better AI clearance. All patients studied had significantly elevated plasma AI concentrations (1.22 to 9.45 mumol/L; normal less than 0.56 mumol/L). Plasma AI did not correlate with estimated total AI intake. During hemodialysis with a cuprophane membrane, AI clearance ranged from 33.5 to 42.1 mL/min. Total AI removal was 192.2 +/- 90.4 mumol during cuprophane dialysis. During hemodialysis with a PAN membrane, AI clearance ranged from 35.7 to 54 mL/min. Total AI removal was 154.2 to 93.9 mumol during PAN dialysis. The differences in AI clearance and total AI removal were not statistically significant. It is concluded that use of a PAN membrane does not significantly enhance DFO-AI clearance.