RESUMEN
Behavioral side effects related to the use of levetiracetam (LEV) in epilepsy are increasingly being recognized. Patients followed in our center have reported improvement of these side effects after starting pyridoxine (vitamin B(6)) supplements. Using mailed questionnaires, retrospective chart reviews, and phone call follow-ups, we analyzed 42 pediatric patients who had been treated with LEV and pyridoxine. Twenty-two patients started pyridoxine after being on LEV, and significant behavioral improvement was observed in nine (41%), no effect in eight (36%), deterioration in four (18%), and an uncertain effect in one. The effects of pyridoxine supplementation were observed during the first week. The remaining patients (20) were already on pyridoxine before LEV was started, started pyridoxine and LEV at the same time, or took pyridoxine intermittently. Pyridoxine is an easily available, inexpensive, and safe therapeutic option. Given these preliminary results, we plan to conduct a placebo-controlled cross-over study to better characterize these observations.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Síntomas Conductuales/inducido químicamente , Síntomas Conductuales/dietoterapia , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Piridoxina/administración & dosificación , Complejo Vitamínico B/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Masculino , Piracetam/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Treatments and perceptions of epilepsy have been found to vary across cultures. This study draws on a comparison of two patient samples, one from the United States (n=28), the other from Kashmir (n=29), to gauge the similarities and differences in social perceptions of epilepsy, attitudes toward conventional and alternative treatments, practice of conventional and alternative treatments, and selected quality-of-life issues. While both the Kashmiri and American patients interviewed were prescribed a similar regimen of traditional antiepileptic drugs, a wider range of drugs and treatments were available to and used by the latter. The use of adjunctive spiritual therapies was more prevalent in the Kashmiri sample, and the use of alternative, nonpharmacological therapies was more prevalent in the American sample. Quality of life for the Kashmiri patients sampled was found to be poorer in terms of educational and occupational opportunities, feelings of stigmatization, and openness with others about the illness. Although the two patient populations interviewed differed in their access to resources and approaches to the disorder, both samples were found to be similar overall in many attitudes and practices relating to epilepsy and its treatment.