Cardiac Rehabilitation After Hospitalization for Acute Coronary Syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) carries a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Cardiac rehabilitation over the past century has developed as an important tool in treating and preventing future myocardial infarction events in this critical group. We summarize the rationale and literature evidence supporting the use of cardiac rehabilitation and its role in ACS patients, with an emphasis on its impact on outcomes following hospitalization. RECENT FINDINGS: Current literature and large-scale reviews and registry analyses provide conflicting data on the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation after ACS, including its impact on mortality, readmission, and quality of life. Cardiac rehabilitation is an important tool in the management ACS patients. It encompasses not only a graduated exercise regimen but also a holistic approach and is therefore best implemented as a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation strategy including, in addition to exercise regimen, psychosocial counseling, smoking cessation education, medication adherence, nutrition guidance, and other tools for risk modification. Further trials on the role of cardiac rehabilitation after ACS are needed, especially trials examining different cardiac rehabilitation protocols, time period for its implementation after ACS, and optimal program duration.

A QI initiative for bridging the health literacy gap by Educating internal medicine residents at a community hospital.

Introduction: Only 12% of Americans have proficient health literacy (HL). Patients hide this fact from others including physicians. This quality improvement (QI) project was developed to compare internal medicine (IM) resident physicians' (RPs) ability to accurately predict patients with low HL and to improve IM-RPs' understanding of low HL and its impact on patients. Aim statement: Over six-months, our aim was to increase the IM residents' HL-knowledge by 30% as measured by an HL-Knowledge-Based-Survey. Methods: After IRB exemption, patients visiting the residency-clinic within a two-week period were screened for low HL with the REALM-R, a validated tool. Post-visit, IM-RPs were asked to predict their patients' HL. A comparison of predicted-HL and measured-HL was made. IM-RPs were emailed an HL-Knowledge-Based-Survey (pre-education and post-education) to measure their background knowledge of HL. Education included HL-workshop, pre-clinic conference and lectures. Pre-education and post-education scores were compared. Results: HL-RPs' prediction and patients' REALM-R results were completed by 108 RP-patient pairs. IM-RPs correctly identified 5 of 40 patients who were at risk for low HL (sensitivity = 12.5%). They correctly identified 97.1% of 68 who were not at risk (specificity = 97.1%). Our residents' knowledge pre-education and post-education did not improve - 58% (n = 18) vs 62% (n = 10). Conclusion: Our QI result verified that IM-RPs overestimate patients' HL and do not understand the magnitude or consequences of low HL nor techniques to improve such patients' understanding. This suggests an area for residency curricular development in order to improve patients' ability to navigate the healthcare system successfully.