Paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy affects markers of bone mineral disease in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT-SHPT study.

BACKGROUND: In this Phase 4 international study, efficacy and safety of paricalcitol-centred therapy were compared with that of cinacalcet-centred therapy for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients undergoing haemodialysis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00977080). METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years of age with Stage 5 CKD and SHPT [intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of 300-800 pg/mL, calcium level of 8.4-10.0 mg/dL and phosphate concentration of ≤ 6.5 mg/dL] who were undergoing haemodialysis were included. Patients were randomized by mode of paricalcitol administration [i.e. intravenous (IV) or oral strata] to receive paricalcitol- or cinacalcet-centred therapy for ≤ 28 weeks. Changes in metabolic markers [total alkaline phosphatase (AP), bone-specific AP and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23)] and the proportion of patients in each treatment group who achieved an iPTH level of 150-300 pg/mL during Weeks 8, 16 and 21-28 as a composite value were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with cinacalcet-centred therapy, levels of both bone turnover markers were significantly reduced from baseline with IV and oral paricalcitol-centred treatment (P < 0.05 for both dosing strata) at Weeks 8, 16 and 28. Levels of FGF-23 were increased with paricalcitol versus cinacalcet-centred treatment. A greater proportion of patients receiving paricalcitol-centred therapy achieved target iPTH levels (i.e. 150-300 pg/mL) throughout the study in the IV and oral dosing strata compared with patients receiving cinacalcet-centred treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CKD and SHPT undergoing haemodialysis, paricalcitol-centred therapy reduced circulating bone turnover markers and iPTH levels and increased FGF-23 levels compared with cinacalcet-centred treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00977080.

Efficacy and initial dose determination of paricalcitol for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in Chinese subjects.

AIM: Prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), a renal disease complication, is increasing in China. Available therapies may not optimally control SHPT, particularly in patients with hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and parathyroid hyperplasia. This study examined efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of selective vitamin D receptor activator paricalcitol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects with SHPT (n = 216) undergoing hemodialysis were treated with paricalcitol i.v. for 12 weeks. One group was treated according to the EU paricalcitol package insert (PI) (initial µg dose based on iPTH/80), and the other was treated according to the US PI (initial dose of 0.04 µg/kg). Dose titration was based on iPTH and serum calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) levels. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of two consecutive ≥ 30% iPTH decreases was achieved by 88.6% and 55.9% of subjects in the EU and US PI groups, respectively. Noninferiority of the EU PI group vs. the US PI group was demonstrated (lower bound of the 1-sided 97.5% CI = 21.3%). Superiority of the EU PI group was shown (lower limit > 0%) and confirmed by Fisher's exact test (p < 0.001); both groups showed similar achievement of recommended KDIGO iPTH levels. Ca and P levels were relatively constant. CONCLUSION: Both EU and US PI paricalcitol dosing strategies effectively reduced iPTH levels in Chinese subjects with SHPT, with minimal impact on Ca and P levels.

Cost effectiveness of paricalcitol versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients in the USA.

BACKGROUND: The IMPACT SHPT [Improved Management of Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) with Paricalcitol-Centered Therapy Versus Cinacalcet Therapy with Low-Dose Vitamin D in Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism] study compared the effectiveness of paricalcitol and cinacalcet in the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients but did not report the costs or cost effectiveness of these treatments. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the cost effectiveness of a paricalcitol-based regimen versus cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients from a US payer perspective, using a 1-year time horizon. METHODS: This was a post hoc cost-effectiveness analysis of data collected for US patients enrolled in the IMPACT SHPT study-a 28-week, randomized, open-label, phase 4, multinational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080). Patients eligible for the IMPACT SHPT study were aged≥18 years with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, had been receiving maintenance haemodialysis three times weekly for at least 3 months before screening and were to continue haemodialysis during the study. Only US patients who reached the evaluation period (weeks 21-28) were included in this secondary analysis. US subjects in the IMPACT SHPT study were randomly assigned to receive intravenous paricalcitol, or oral cinacalcet plus fixed-dose intravenous doxercalciferol, for 28 weeks. Patients in the paricalcitol group could also receive supplemental cinacalcet for hypercalcaemia. The primary effectiveness endpoint in the IMPACT SHPT study was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of 150-300 pg/mL during the evaluation period. In this secondary analysis, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), comparing paricalcitol-treated patients with cinacalcet-treated patients on the basis of this primary endpoint and several secondary endpoints. Costs were estimated by examining the dosage of the study drug (paricalcitol or cinacalcet) and phosphate binders used by each participant during the trial. Nonparametric bootstrap analysis was used to examine the accuracy of the ICER point estimates. RESULTS: The percentages of patients achieving the treatment goal of a mean iPTH level between 150-300 pg/mL during weeks 21-28 of therapy were 56.9% in the paricalcitol group and 34.0% in the cinacalcet group (a difference of 23%, p=0.0235). Paricalcitol was also more effective for each of the secondary endpoints. When annualized, the total drug costs were US$10,153 in the paricalcitol group and US$15,967 in the cinacalcet group, a difference of US$5,814 (57.3%, p=0.0053). Because the paricalcitol-based treatment was less expensive and more effective, it was 'dominant', compared with cinacalcet, in this cost-effectiveness analyses. In our bootstrap analysis, 99.1% of bootstrap replicates for the ICER of the primary endpoint fell within the lower right quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane-where paricalcitol is considered dominant. For all of the other endpoints, paricalcitol was dominant in 100% of replicates. CONCLUSION: On the basis of dosing and effectiveness data from US patients in the IMPACT SHPT study, we found that a regimen of intravenous paricalcitol was more cost effective than cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D in the management of iPTH in patients with SHPT requiring haemodialysis.

Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving haemodialysis: results of the IMPACT SHPT study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) has not been defined. The IMPACT SHPT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00977080) study assessed whether dose-titrated paricalcitol plus supplemental cinacalcet only for hypercalcaemia is superior to cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels in patients with SHPT on haemodialysis. METHODS: In this 28-week, multicentre, open-label Phase 4 study, participants were randomly selected to receive paricalcitol or cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D. Randomization and analyses were stratified by mode of paricalcitol administration [intravenous (IV) or oral]. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who achieved a mean iPTH value of 150-300 pg/mL during Weeks 21-28. RESULTS: Of 272 subjects randomized, 268 received one or more dose of study drug; 101 in the IV and 110 in the oral stratum with two or more values during Weeks 21-28 were included in the primary analysis. In the IV stratum, 57.7% of subjects in the paricalcitol versus 32.7% in the cinacalcet group (P = 0.016) achieved the primary end point. In the oral stratum, the corresponding proportions of subjects were 54.4% for paricalcitol and 43.4% for cinacalcet (P = 0.260). Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis, controlling for stratum, revealed overall superiority of paricalcitol (56.0%) over cinacalcet (38.2%; P = 0.010) in achieving iPTH 150-300 pg/mL during Weeks 21-28. Hypercalcaemia occurred in 4 (7.7%) and 0 (0%) of paricalcitol-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively. Hypocalcaemia occurred in 46.9% and 54.7% of cinacalcet-treated subjects in the IV and oral strata, respectively. CONCLUSION: Paricalcitol versus cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D provided superior control of iPTH, with low incidence of hypercalcaemia.

Anemia: a continuing problem following kidney transplantation.

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death among kidney transplant recipients. Anemia, a risk factor for cardiovascular complications among patients with chronic kidney disease, has not been well characterized in kidney transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the prevalence of and factors associated with anemia among 240 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our institution. The mean hematocrit (Hct) rose from 33% at 1 month after transplantation to 40% at 12 months after transplantation. The proportion of patients with Hct < 36% was 76% at transplantation and 21% and 36%, 1 year and 4 years after transplantation, respectively. Six months after transplantation, women had higher likelihood (OR = 3.61) of Hct < 36%, while higher Hct at 3 months (OR = 0.67 for 1% higher Hct) and diabetes (OR = 0.14) were associated with a lower likelihood of Hct < 36%. Similar associations were seen 12 months after transplantation. Even among patients with Hct < 30%, only 36% had iron studies, 46% received iron supplementation and 40% received recombinant human erythropoietin. Awareness of factors associated with a lower Hct may prompt better anemia screening and management, potentially improving cardiovascular outcomes among kidney transplant recipients.