The Overview of Practical Guidelines for Gliomas by KSNO, NCCN, and EANO.

Gliomas have been histologically diagnosed as the third most common primary tumor of the central nervous system (CNS) in a relatively small portion of Korea. Despite the rarity of gliomas, the disease entity is very dynamic due to its various molecular characteristics, compared with other CNS tumors. The practice of managing glioma patients is not globally established as a precise standard guideline because of the different socio-medical environments of individual countries. The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) published guidelines for managing adult glioma in 2019, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Association of Neuro-Oncology published guidelines in September 2021 and March 2021, respectively. However, these guidelines have several different recommendations in practice, including tissue management, adjuvant treatment after surgical resection, and salvage treatment for recurrent/progressive gliomas. Currently, the KSNO guideline working group is preparing an updated version of the guideline for managing adult gliomas. In this review, common features have been verified and different points are analyzed. Consequently, this review is expected to be informative and helpful to provide high quality evidence and a strong recommendation level for the establishment of new KSNO guidelines for managing gliomas.

The Impact of Tumor Treating Fields on Glioblastoma Progression Patterns.

PURPOSE: Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are an antimitotic treatment modality that interfere with glioblastoma (GBM) cell division and organelle assembly by delivering low-intensity, alternating electric fields to the tumor. A previous analysis from the pivotal EF-14 trial demonstrated a clear correlation between TTFields dose density at the tumor bed and survival in patients treated with TTFields. This study tests the hypothesis that the antimitotic effects of TTFields result in measurable changes in the location and patterns of progression of newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Magnetic resonance images of 428 newly diagnosed GBM patients who participated in the pivotal EF-14 trial were reviewed, and the rates at which distant progression occurred in the TTFields treatment and control arm were compared. Realistic head models of 252 TTFields-treated patients were created, and TTFields intensity distributions were calculated using a finite element method. The TTFields dose was calculated within regions of the tumor bed and normal brain, and its relationship with progression was determined. RESULTS: Distant progression was frequently observed in the TTFields-treated arm, and distant lesions in the TTFields-treated arm appeared at greater distances from the primary lesion than in the control arm. Distant progression correlated with improved clinical outcome in the TTFields patients, with no such correlation observed in the controls. Areas of normal brain that remained normal were exposed to higher TTFields doses compared with normal brain that subsequently exhibited neoplastic progression. Additionally, the average dose to areas of the enhancing tumor that returned to normal was significantly higher than in the areas of the normal brain that progressed to enhancing tumor. CONCLUSIONS: There was a direct correlation between TTFields dose distribution and tumor response, confirming the therapeutic activity of TTFields and the rationale for optimizing array placement to maximize the TTFields dose in areas at highest risk of progression, as well as array layout adaptation after progression.

Tumor treating fields plus temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a sub-group analysis of Korean patients in the EF-14 phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are anti-mitotic, non-invasive loco-regional cancer therapy comprising low intensity, intermediate frequency alternating electric fields. TTFields plus Temozolomide (TTFields/TMZ) extended survival versus TMZ alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients in the EF-14 trial. We report on Korean newly diagnosed GBM patients who participated in the EF-14 trial. METHODS: Thirty-nine participants of the EF-14 trial were enrolled at 8 sites in South Korea. Patients (24 TTFields/TMZ; 14 TMZ alone) received: TTFields (200 kHz) for > 18 h/day; TMZ at 120-150 mg for 5 days per a 28 day cycle. Safety and efficacy were assessed. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics were balanced in the 2 arms and the mean age was 52.1 years, 66.7% were male with a mean KPS of 90. Safety incidence was comparable between the 2 arms. In the TTFields/TMZ arm, 30% suffered from skin irritation versus 52% in the entire study population. No TTFields-related serious adverse events were reported. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the TTFields/TMZ arm was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.2-12.2) versus 4.2 (95% CI 1.9-11.2) with TMZ alone (p = 0.67). Median overall survival was 27.2 months (95% CI 21-NA) with TTFields/TMZ versus 15.2 months (95% CI 7.5-24.1; HR 0.27, p = 0.01) with TMZ alone. CONCLUSION: Median OS and 1- and 2-year survival rates were higher with TTFields/TMZ and similar to the entire EF-14 population. About 30% of patients reported skin irritation, a lower rate than seen in the entire EF-14 population. These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of TTFields in Korean newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. CLINICAL TRIALS: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.

Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) is an antimitotic treatment modality that interferes with glioblastoma cell division and organelle assembly by delivering low-intensity alternating electric fields to the tumor. Objective: To investigate whether TTFields improves progression-free and overall survival of patients with glioblastoma, a fatal disease that commonly recurs at the initial tumor site or in the central nervous system. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized, open-label trial, 695 patients with glioblastoma whose tumor was resected or biopsied and had completed concomitant radiochemotherapy (median time from diagnosis to randomization, 3.8 months) were enrolled at 83 centers (July 2009-2014) and followed up through December 2016. A preliminary report from this trial was published in 2015; this report describes the final analysis. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to TTFields plus maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229). The TTFields, consisting of low-intensity, 200 kHz frequency, alternating electric fields, was delivered (≥ 18 hours/d) via 4 transducer arrays on the shaved scalp and connected to a portable device. Temozolomide was administered to both groups (150-200 mg/m2) for 5 days per 28-day cycle (6-12 cycles). Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression-free survival (tested at α = .046). The secondary end point was overall survival (tested hierarchically at α = .048). Analyses were performed for the intent-to-treat population. Adverse events were compared by group. Results: Of the 695 randomized patients (median age, 56 years; IQR, 48-63; 473 men [68%]), 637 (92%) completed the trial. Median progression-free survival from randomization was 6.7 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 4.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76; P < .001). Median overall survival was 20.9 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group vs 16.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.76; P < .001). Systemic adverse event frequency was 48% in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 44% in the temozolomide-alone group. Mild to moderate skin toxicity underneath the transducer arrays occurred in 52% of patients who received TTFields-temozolomide vs no patients who received temozolomide alone. Conclusions and Relevance: In the final analysis of this randomized clinical trial of patients with glioblastoma who had received standard radiochemotherapy, the addition of TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy vs maintenance temozolomide alone, resulted in statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival. These results are consistent with the previous interim analysis. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.

Clinical outcome and quality of life after treatment of patients with central neurocytoma.

Central neurocytoma (CN) is an uncommon, deep-seated tumor of the central nervous system. Optimal treatment strategies and long-term outcomes are not well established. The mainstay of initial treatment CN is total surgical resection whenever possible; however, CNs cannot be resected completely in more than half of patients. Advances in alternative and adjuvant treatments and their role in the treatment of CN is becoming significant. This article provides an overview of the clinical outcomes of various treatment modalities, recent advances, and recommendations for the treatment of CN, emphasizing functional outcomes and the quality of life.

Bimedial rectus hypermetabolism in convergence spasm as observed on positron emission tomography.

A 52-year-old man developed vertical gaze palsy, convergence spasm, and convergence-retraction nystagmus due to glioblastoma of the right thalamus. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) inadvertently demonstrated markedly increased metabolism in the medial rectus muscles. The hypermetabolism indicates active contraction of these extraocular muscles due to excessive convergence drive attributed to inappropriate activation or disrupted inhibition of convergence neurons by the diencephalic lesion.