Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Urology ; 154: 300-307, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933503

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the postoperative efficacy and complications of the transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) using the nationwide insurance database of Korea. METHODS: We created a cohort of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients treated with TURP and HoLEP between 2011 and 2017 from the nationwide database of reimbursement. We compared the postoperative effects between the two surgical groups. RESULTS: We retrieved a total of 58,346 patients (TURP 38,308 and HoLEP 20,038 patients). The mean follow-up duration was 51.6 and 47.6 months, respectively. The rate of reoperation was significantly higher in the TURP group (4.50%) than in the HoLEP group (1.27%) (P < .01). The postoperative use of alpha-blockers and dutasteride/finasteride was significantly higher in the TURP group until 24 months postoperatively. The rate of the postoperative use of medications for symptoms of overactive bladder was lower in the TURP group than in the HoLEP group until 12 months postoperatively, but it did not differ after 12 months postoperatively. Overall, urethral surgeries were less frequently performed in the TURP group than in the HoLEP group (P < .05); however, more severe cases required surgeries under general anesthesia in the TURP group (P < .05). Postoperative surgery for stress incontinence was performed in 0.10% and 0.31% of patients after TURP and HoLEP, respectively (P < .01). CONCLUSION: This study showed the superiority of HoLEP compared to TURP in terms of postoperative efficacy and its inferiority in terms of complications of stress incontinence in real life practice.


Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido/efectos adversos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , República de Corea , Factores de Tiempo , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Sex Med ; 16(2): 223-234, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30770070

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of arginine supplements in erectile dysfunction (ED) remain debatable. AIM: To assess the potential role of arginine supplements on ED as alternatives to phosphodiesterase inhibitors. METHODS: Studies published up to April 2018 that evaluated the efficacy of arginine supplements were identified from multiple databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Kiss, DBpia, and Cochrane databases). Studies comparing arginine supplements with placebo or no treatment; focusing only on patients with mild to moderate severity of ED; and presenting outcomes such as improvement rate, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score, and adverse effects were included. Subgroup analysis for arginine alone and arginine in combination with other substances was further conducted to increase interpretability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The strength of the association between arginine supplements and ED was assessed using relative odds ratios and weighted mean differences with 95% CI. RESULTS: In total, 10 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes of 540 patients with ED. The analysis demonstrated that arginine supplements with dosage ranging from 1,500 to 5,000 mg significantly improved ED compared with placebo or no treatment (odds ratios, 3.37 [1.29, 8.77], P = .01, I2 = 44). Arginine supplements also caused significant improvements in the IIEF subdomain scores of overall satisfaction, intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, and erectile function, whereas the IIEF sexual desire score remain unchanged. The adverse effect rate in the arginine-treated group was 8.3%, and that in the placebo group was 2.3%, none of which were severe. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Arginine supplements can be recommended to patients with mild to moderate ED. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The strength of this study is that it is the first meta-analysis to assess the potential role of arginine supplements in ED compared with placebo or no treatment. A limitation is that the treatment dosage and duration varied among studies, which may have contributed to study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review and meta-analysis provide evidence on the effectiveness of arginine supplements for mild to moderate ED. Rhim HC, Kim MS, Park Y-J, et al. The Potential Role of Arginine Supplements on Erectile Dysfunction: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2019;16:223-234.


Asunto(s)
Arginina/uso terapéutico , Disfunción Eréctil/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/uso terapéutico , Arginina/efectos adversos , Arginina/farmacología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Erección Peniana/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
3.
World J Mens Health ; 32(2): 83-6, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25237657

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a sclerosing solution for inducing epididymal occlusion in male rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into two groups: an injection group (n=20) and control group (n=20). Before injecting the sclerosing agent, seminal vesiculectomy and sperm identification using electrostimulation were performed in all of the rats. In the injection group, 0.2 mL of 0.1% sodium tetradecyl sulfate solution was injected into the epididymis. In the sham group, only the identification of the epididymis was performed. At 4 and 12 weeks after the injection, semen was collected by electrostimulation and evaluated to assess the contraceptive effect. Epididymis was evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. RESULTS: After 4 and 12 weeks, semen collection was performed in the two groups. Sperms were not observed in the injection group, while there was no change in the sperms in the sham group. H&E staining showed the obstruction of epididymal tubules and an accumulation of inflammatory cells in the injection group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the sclerosing agent induced sterilization in male rats. This result suggests that the injection method can replace vasectomy as a contraceptive method. However, a further study of large animals and a clinical study are needed. Further, the long-term effectiveness of this method needs to be studied.

4.
Urology ; 79(1): 202-6, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22014961

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Few studies exist correlating the extent of tissue resected with symptom improvement after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). This study evaluated the effect of the ratio of resected tissue in comparison with the transitional zone volume (TZV) on improvement of voiding symptoms and flow rate. METHODS: A total of 263 patients who underwent TURP from January 2001 to June 2008 were included in this retrospective study. TURP efficacy was assessed at 6 months using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and uroflowmetry. Patients were then stratified into 2 subgroups according to resection ratio (volume of resected tissue/TZV); individuals with resection ratio<50% (group A) and ≥50% (group B). The 2 groups were compared with regard to prostate volume, TZV, preoperative and postoperative IPSS, quality of life (QoL), peak flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual (PVR). Similar analyses were performed according to prostate volume (small [<40 g] vs large [≥40 g]). RESULTS: Of these individuals, 85 (32.3%) met the criteria for group A, and 178 (67.7%) for group B. There were no statistically significant differences in age, prostate volume, TZV, preoperative IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR. After TURP, there was no significant difference of IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR between the 2 groups. After stratification according to prostate size, the differences in clinical variables were not significant according to resection ratio. CONCLUSION: Resection ratio had no effect on post-TURP clinical improvement. These results suggest that complete prostate adenoma resection may not be essential.


Asunto(s)
Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/etiología , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Micción/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Próstata/anatomía & histología , Próstata/cirugía , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastornos Urinarios/etiología , Trastornos Urinarios/fisiopatología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA