RESUMEN
Dogs have been widely used to study the oral absorption of a drug in drug discovery. However, there has been no quantitative validation of using dogs to predict the fraction of oral dose absorbed (Fa) in humans (Fah) for poorly water-soluble drugs. Here, we report the results of using dogs for quantitative Fah prediction, focusing on poorly water-soluble free acid and neutral drugs. The Fa values of 4 acidic and 1 neutral proprietary compounds were measured in humans and dogs. Extensive literature survey was also performed to increase the number of Fa data. Fah and Fa in dogs (Fad) were then compared at equivalent body weight-normalized doses. In the case of neutral compounds, Fad was found to be similar to Fah. In the case of acidic compounds, Fad significantly overestimated Fah in most cases. A difference in intestinal pH was suggested as the main reason for this discrepancy. In conclusion, the use of dogs would not be appropriate to predict Fah for acidic compounds, but more work is required to know about neutral compounds.
Asunto(s)
Absorción Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Absorción Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/metabolismo , Agua/metabolismo , Administración Oral , Animales , Células CACO-2 , Perros , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Solubilidad , Especificidad de la EspecieRESUMEN
Photosafety evaluation is becoming important during the drug development process in pharmaceutical companies. Both in vitro and in vivo test systems have been developed for the evaluation of phototoxic potential of chemicals. In the present study, we conducted an in vivo phototoxicity test using BALB/c mice. The mice were treated with sparfloxacin, lomefloxacin, or a quinoline derivative orally followed by the irradiation of simulated sunlight, and resulting phototoxic reactions of the ears were assessed. Sparfloxacin and lomefloxacin, but not the quinoline derivative, are well known to cause photoirritation in humans. All three drugs exhibited positive reaction in the 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity test (3T3 NRU PT). In the in vivo test, sparfloxacin and lomefloxacin exhibited positive skin reaction in mice, but the quinoline derivative did not. The results of in vivo phototoxicity test in the mice coincided with phototoxic potential of these drugs in humans. The exposure levels of sparfloxacin or lomefloxacin at the minimum effective dose that exhibited phototoxic reaction in the mice were comparable with those in humans treated with the recommended therapeutic dose.