Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Dig Endosc ; 26(3): 385-91, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24283587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is generally a comfortable and safe procedure, it has some disadvantages, such as complicated preprocessing and occasional repulsion reaction during catheterization. In an attempt to simplify the preprocessing method, the efficacy of a catheter-free method in which a catheter is not inserted into the nasal cavity was assessed. METHODS: The present study was a prospective, open-label, single-center, randomized controlled study with parallel assignment allocation 1:1. Between March 2009 and August 2009, a total of 93 TNE-naïve patients were enrolled and randomized. Patients were prospectively randomized into two groups (catheter-free vs catheter-insertion method). Patients who prepared according to the catheter-free method and who were unsuccessful underwent the catheter-insertion method. Clinical characteristics, success rate, complications, vital signs, acceptability, and tolerability were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Success rates of the catheter-free and catheter-insertion methods were 88% (n=44) and 88% (n=38) (P>0.05), respectively. Causes of failure in the catheter-free method included severe rhinalgia (n=1, 2%) and narrowing of the nasal cavity (n=5, 10%). Causes of failure in the catheter-insertion method included narrowing of the nasal cavity (n=5, 11%). Six patients whose TNE failed with the catheter-free method also experienced failed TNE with the catheter-insertion method. There were no statistical differences in vital signs, acceptability, and tolerability. CONCLUSION: The catheter-free method is sufficient for preparation for TNE. The success rate of TNE depends more on the structure of the nasal cavity than the preprocessing method.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres , Endoscopios Gastrointestinales , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Anciano , Anestesia Local/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cavidad Nasal , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , República de Corea
2.
Molecules ; 18(11): 14448-54, 2013 Nov 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24284494

RESUMEN

Seed oil triacylglycerol (TAG) composition of 32 soybean varieties were determined and compared using ¹H-NMR. The contents of linolenic (Ln), linoleic (L), and oleic (O) ranged from 10.7% to 19.3%, 37.4%-50.1%, and 15.7%-34.1%, respectively. As is evident, linoleic acid was the major fatty acid of soybean oil. Compositional differences among the varieties were observed. Natural oils containing unsaturated groups have been regarded as important nutrient and cosmetic ingredients because of their various biological activities. The TAG profiles of the soy bean oils could be useful for distinguishing the origin of seeds and controlling the quality of soybean oils. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which the TAG composition of various soybean oils has been analyzed using the ¹H-NMR method.


Asunto(s)
Glycine max/química , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Aceites de Plantas/análisis , Semillas/química , Triglicéridos/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA