Immigrant women's and families' views and experiences of routine postnatal care: findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Uptake of postnatal care (PNC) is low and inequitable in many countries, and immigrant women may experience additional challenges to access and effective use. As part of a larger study examining the views of women, partners, and families on routine PNC, we analysed a subset of data on the specific experiences of immigrant women and families. METHODS: This is a subanalysis of a larger qualitative evidence synthesis. We searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, EBM-Reviews and grey literature for studies published until December 2019 with extractable qualitative data with no language restrictions. For this analysis, we focused on papers related to immigrant women and families. Two reviewers screened each study independently; inclusion was agreed by consensus. Data abstraction and quality assessment were carried out using a study-specific extraction form and established quality assessment tools. Study findings were identified using thematic analysis. Findings are presented by confidence in the finding, applying the GRADE-CERQual approach. FINDINGS: We included 44 papers, out of 602 full-texts, representing 11 countries where women and families sought PNC after immigrating. All but one included immigrants to high-income countries. Four themes were identified: resources and access, differences from home country, support needs, and experiences of care. High confidence study findings included: language and communication challenges; uncertainty about navigating system supports including transportation; high mental health, emotional, and informational needs; the impact of personal resources and social support; and the quality of interaction with healthcare providers. These findings highlight the importance of care experiences beyond clinical care. More research is also needed on the experiences of families migrating between low-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant families experience many challenges in getting routine PNC, especially related to language, culture, and communication. Some challenges may be mitigated by improving comprehensive and accessible information on available services, as well as holistic social support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019139183.

PKCι is a target of 7,8,4'-trihydroxyisoflavone for the suppression of UVB-induced MMP-1 expression.

The soy isoflavone daidzein is bioconverted to 7,8,4'-trihydroxyisoflavone (7,8,4'-THIF) by microorganisms. Here, we investigated the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 inhibitory properties of 7,8,4'-THIF that arise through the suppression of UVB-induced MMP-1 expression. 7,8,4'-THIF reduced UVB-induced MMP-1 expression at the transcriptional level in primary human dermal fibroblasts and inhibited UVB-induced transcriptional activity of AP-1, a major activator of MMP-1 expression. Additionally, it was observed that the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, a crucial signalling cascade for MMP-1 expression, was suppressed by 7,8,4'-THIF. Protein kinase C iota (PKCι) was suspected to be a direct target of 7,8,4'-THIF. The direct interaction between 7,8,4'-THIF and PKCι was confirmed using pull-down assays and immobilized metal ion affinity-based fluorescence polarization assays. Finally, we observed that 7,8,4'-THIF inhibited UVB-induced MMP-1 expression in a human skin equivalent model. Taken together, these results suggest that 7,8,4'-THIF, a bioconversion product of daidzein, suppresses UVB-induced MMP-1 expression.

Analysis of Glycemic Control of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Management Program in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: An integrated health care system with its own regional health plan located in Texas implemented a pharmacist-led diabetes medication management program (MMP) to treat type 2 diabetic patients (baseline A1c > 7.5%). The MMP formed collaborative practice agreements with the system's physicians to allow ambulatory care pharmacists to modify and adjust diabetic drug regimens when appropriate. Enrolled MMP patients received personalized visits with ambulatory care pharmacists and a copay waiver on diabetes medications. OBJECTIVE: To study the outcomes of an outpatient, pharmacist-led MMP, along with a copay waiver on diabetes drugs, in treating adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus over a 2-year period compared with standard care practice. METHODS: This retrospective study employed a quasi-experimental design and used medical claims, pharmacy claims, eligibility data, and electronic medical records. Patients aged 18 to 62 years, who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and had at least 1 diabetes-related pharmacy claim in the year before the MMP, as well as continuous enrollment in the health plan, were included. Patients enrolled in the pharmacist-led MMP for at least 2 years (n =75) were matched to standard care patients (n =75) on age, gender, baseline A1c, insulin use, and physical comorbidity. The primary outcome was the 2-year change in A1c. Secondary outcomes included inpatient costs, outpatient costs, and pharmacy costs from the baseline period (year before enrollment) compared with the follow-up period (second year of enrollment). RESULTS: After matching MMP patients (n = 75) to control patients (n = 75), the baseline A1c (9.30 and 9.26), the mean age (53.0 and 53.3, respectively), the Selim Physical Score (3.32 and 3.26, respectively), and the use of insulin (56.0% and 56.0%, respectively) were similar in both groups. MMP patients had a greater mean reduction in A1c compared with standard care patients (-1.24 vs. -0.59, P = 0.009) from baseline to after 2 years. After 2 years, the A1c for MMP patients was significantly lower compared with control patients (8.06 vs.8.67, respectively, P = 0.014). There was also a difference in A1c after 1 year for MMP patients versus control patients (8.18 and 8.69, respectively, P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacist-led diabetes MMP, combined with a diabetes drug copay waiver, was effective in significantly reducing A1c over a 2-year period for type 2 diabetic patients in this regional health plan.

Polyphenols and Glycemic Control.

Growing evidence from animal studies supports the anti-diabetic properties of some dietary polyphenols, suggesting that dietary polyphenols could be one dietary therapy for the prevention and management of Type 2 diabetes. This review aims to address the potential mechanisms of action of dietary polyphenols in the regulation of glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity based on in vitro and in vivo studies, and to provide a comprehensive overview of the anti-diabetic effects of commonly consumed dietary polyphenols including polyphenol-rich mixed diets, tea and coffee, chocolate and cocoa, cinnamon, grape, pomegranate, red wine, berries and olive oil, with a focus on human clinical trials. Dietary polyphenols may inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase, inhibit glucose absorption in the intestine by sodium-dependent glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1), stimulate insulin secretion and reduce hepatic glucose output. Polyphenols may also enhance insulin-dependent glucose uptake, activate 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), modify the microbiome and have anti-inflammatory effects. However, human epidemiological and intervention studies have shown inconsistent results. Further intervention studies are essential to clarify the conflicting findings and confirm or refute the anti-diabetic effects of dietary polyphenols.

Retrospective evaluation of the impact of copayment increases for specialty medications on adherence and persistence in an integrated health maintenance organization system.

BACKGROUND: Specialty drugs are generally defined as high-cost injectable, infused, oral, or inhaled drugs that require close monitoring. Specialty drugs account for an increasing percentage of total drug expenditures, and management of specialty drugs has become a priority. A Central Texas-based integrated health maintenance organization system implemented a specialty drug benefit to manage expensive specialty drug costs. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to measure and compare the change in adherence and persistence after implementation of copayment increases for select specialty medications used on a long-term basis (at least 2 years). METHODS: Patients who were long-term users of anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant, cancer, and multiple sclerosis medications were selected. The intervention group consisted of those whose out-of-pocket payment for specialty medications increased, and the control group consisted of those whose out-of-pocket costs did not change. Adherence, defined by proportion of days covered, was measured every 3 months for 12 months before and after the change. Individual growth model analysis evaluated the changes in adherence. Cox regression analysis determined the difference in persistence between groups. RESULTS: There were 178 and 202 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The growth model showed a small but statistically significant decrease in proportion of days covered of 0.040 after copay changes in the intervention versus control group (P < 0.001) for immunosuppressants. The Cox regression analysis indicated a higher probability of intervention patients on anti-inflammatory drugs (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.38-4.62) and immunosuppressants (HR = 3.01; 95% CI, 1.20-7.56) would be nonpersistent compared with those in their control groups. CONCLUSIONS: The move to the specialty formulary allows for closer scrutiny of specialty utilization by pharmacists, who actively monitor utilization and access. Despite the minimal adherence decrease and significant persistence changes with certain drug types, the results indicated relatively more stability with specialty drug use than reported with traditional pharmaceuticals.