Effect of comprehensive cancer genomic profiling on therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: A prospective multicenter study.

Characterization of the genomic landscape of biliary tract cancer (BTC) may lead to applying genotype-matched therapy for patients with this disease. Evidence that comprehensive cancer genomic profiling (CGP) guides genotype-matched therapy to improve clinical outcomes is building. However, the significance of CGP in patients with BTC remains unclarified in clinical practice. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to assess the utility of CGP and identify associations between clinical outcomes and genomic alterations in patients with BTC. In this prospective analysis, detection rates for actionable genomic alterations and access rates for genotype-matched therapy were analyzed in 72 patients with advanced BTC who had undergone commercial CGP. Cox regression analyses assessed relationships between overall survival and genomic alterations detected with CGP. The most common genomic alterations detected were TP53 (41, 56.9%), followed by CDKN2A/B (24, 33.3%/20, 27.8%), and KRAS (20, 27.8%). Actionable genomic alterations were identified in 58.3% (42/72) of patients. Detection rates for FGFR2 fusions, IDH1 mutations, and BRAF V600E were low in this cohort. Eight (11.1%) patients received genotype-matched therapy. For patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), CDKN2A/B loss was associated with shorter overall survival. These real-world data demonstrate that CGP can identify therapeutic options in patients with advanced BTC. CDKN2A/B loss was identified as a poor prognostic factor in patients with ICC. Thus, this study provides a rationale for considering CGP in planning therapeutic strategies for advanced BTC.

[Development of a System for Providing Cancer Genomic Medicine in Hokkaido-From the Standpoint of a Designated Core Hospital for Cancer Genomic Medicine].

Hokkaido University Hospital has been designated as a Core Hospital for Cancer Genomic Medicine and developed a system to provide cancer genomic medicine in Hokkaido with its liaison hospitals. Since being reimbursed in June 2019, comprehensive cancer genome profiling (CGP) testing showed certain therapeutic efficacy in patients with no standard treatment options, but it also revealed some problems such as the small number of patients who can receive therapeutic drugs matched with gene abnormalities. Since candidate drugs are often unapproved or off-label, it is necessary to smoothly introduce clinical trials, advanced medical treatment system, and patient-proposed health care service. At our hospital, we are focusing on sharing information on clinical trials being conducted in Hokkaido, launching investigator-initiated clinical trials, promoting patient-proposed health care service, promoting a registry study of genetic profiling and targeted therapies in patients with rare cancers and accompanying clinical trials, and incorporating pediatric cancer patients. This paper describes Hokkaido's cancer genomic medicine provision system, including its exit strategy, and the human resource development that serve as its foundation.

Clinical significance of comprehensive genomic profiling tests covered by public insurance in patients with advanced solid cancers in Hokkaido, Japan.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive cancer genomic profiling has been used recently for patients with advanced solid cancers. Two cancer genomic profiling tests for patients with no standard treatment are covered by Japanese public health insurance since June 2019. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data of 189 patients with solid cancers who underwent either of the two-cancer genomic profiling tests at Hokkaido University Hospital and its liaison hospitals and whose results were discussed in molecular tumor board at Hokkaido University Hospital between August 2019 and July 2020. RESULTS: All 189 patients had appropriate results. Actionable gene alterations were identified in 93 patients (49%). Frequent mutations included PIK3CA (12%) mutation, BRCA1/2 alteration (7%), ERBB2 amplification (6%) and tumor mutation burden-High (4%). The median turnaround time from sample shipping to acquisition by the expert panel was 26 days. Although 115 patients (61%) were provided with information for genotype-matched therapies, only 21 (11%) received them. Notably, four of eight patients below the age of 20 years were provided information for genotype-matched therapies, and three received them. Their response rates and disease control rates were 29% and 67%, respectively. Most patients who did not undergo the genotype-matched therapies were provided information for only investigational drugs in phases I and II at distant clinical trial sites in central Japan. Twenty-six patients were informed of suspected germline findings, while 11 patients (42%) received genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS: The publicly reimbursed cancer genomic profilings may lead to the modest but favorable therapeutic efficacy of genotype-matched therapy for solid cancer patients with no standard therapy. However, poor access to genotype-matched therapy needs to be resolved.

Clinical impact of a cancer genomic profiling test using an in-house comprehensive targeted sequencing system.

Precision medicine is a promising strategy for cancer treatment. In this study, we developed an in-house clinical sequencing system to perform a comprehensive cancer genomic profiling test as a clinical examination and analyzed the utility of this system. Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor tissues and peripheral blood cells collected from 161 patients with different stages and types of cancer. A comprehensive targeted amplicon exome sequencing for 160 cancer-related genes was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). The sequencing data were analyzed using an original bioinformatics pipeline, and multiple cancer-specific gene alterations were identified. The success rate of our test was 99% (160/161), while re-biopsy was required for 24% (39/161) of the cases. Potentially actionable and actionable gene alterations were detected in 91% (145/160) and 46% (73/160) of the patients, respectively. The actionable gene alterations were frequently detected in PIK3CA (9%), ERBB2 (8%), and EGFR (4%). High tumor mutation burden (TMB) (≥10 mut/Mb) was observed in 12% (19/160) of the patients. The secondary findings in germline variants considered to be associated with hereditary tumors were detected in 9% (15/160) of the patients. Seventeen patients (11%, 17/160) were treated with genotype-matched therapeutic agents, and the response rate was 47% (8/17). The median turnaround time for physicians was 20 days, and the median survival time after the initial visit was 8.7 months. The results of the present study prove the feasibility of implementing in-house clinical sequencing as a promising laboratory examination technique for precision cancer medicine.

Premedication with intravenous magnesium has a protective effect against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

PURPOSE: Magnesium supplementation is an effective protective method against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN); however, there are few reports regarding the mechanism of its nephroprotective effect. The aim of this study was to determine whether premedication with intravenous magnesium prevents CIN and to determine the relationship between its nephroprotective effect and serum magnesium level. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with head and neck cancer who received cisplatin, docetaxel, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) were retrospectively investigated. Grade 2 or more serum creatinine elevation was defined as CIN. The incidence of CIN was compared between a magnesium sulfate (20 mEq, 2.46 g) premedication group and a non-magnesium group during the first cycle and in all cycles. RESULTS: CIN did not occur in any patients receiving magnesium premedication but did occur in 5 of 29 patients during the first cycle and in 6 patients during all subsequent cycles in patients who did not receive magnesium premedication. Furthermore, the variation of creatinine clearance was significantly worse in the non-magnesium group than in the magnesium premedication group from baseline. There was no difference in adverse effects or response rate between the two groups. Univariate analysis suggested that magnesium premedication significantly reduced the risk of CIN. On the other hand, serum magnesium depletion was seen in both groups to equal degrees despite supplementation. CONCLUSION: Intravenous magnesium premedication has a protective effect on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity without the influence on the serum magnesium level. Magnesium premedication is a simple nephroprotective method that does not influence other adverse effects or rate of response to chemotherapy.

Feasibility and efficacy of induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy combined with concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of induction docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy followed by concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Between 2010 and 2013, 30 patients with Stage IV HNSCC were treated in Hokkaido University Hospital with three cycles of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), day 1; and 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2)/day 120 h continuous infusion, every 3 weeks) followed by concurrent weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2), on weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7) chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Three courses of induction chemotherapy were performed in 25 patients (83%) with grade 3-4 toxicities during induction chemotherapy observed in 22 patients (73%). The major toxicities were hematologic, with 22 cases (73%) showing grade 3-4 neutropenia. Radiotherapy was completed (70 Gy) in 29 patients (97%), while a total of 19 patients (63%) completed five (13 patients) or six (6 patients) courses of chemotherapy. During concurrent chemoradiotherapy, no grade 4 hematological toxicities were observed. Grade 4 dermatitis was observed in one patient, and grade 3 mucositis was observed in 12 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths during the induction chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 86%, 72%, and 89%, 81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sequential therapy composed of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy is feasible, showing encouraging results in patients with locally advanced HNSCC. Concurrent weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy following induction chemotherapy appears to be a suitable alternative to three-weekly high-dose cisplatin therapy.