Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus R0 resection for resectable colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases and low peritoneal cancer index scores: a collaborative observational study from Korea and Japan.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis (CPM) remain controversial. R0 resection without peritoneal stripping might be as effective as CRS plus HIPEC. The authors aimed to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of patients with CPM and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores less than or equal to 6 who underwent R0 resection in Japan with those who underwent CRS plus HIPEC in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This international, retrospective cohort study was conducted in Korea and Japan using a prospectively collected clinical database. Patients who underwent surgery from July 2014 to December 2021 for CPM with a PCI score of less than or equal to 6 and completeness of the cytoreduction score-0 were included. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary outcomes were overall survival, peritoneal RFS (PRFS), and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The 3-year RFS was significantly longer in the CRS+HIPEC group than in the R0 resection group: 35.9% versus 6.9% ( P <0.001); 31.0% versus 6.7% ( P =0.040) after propensity score matching. The median PRFS was significantly longer in the CRS+HIPEC group than in the R0 resection group: 24.5 months versus 17.2 months ( P =0.017). The 3-year overall survival and postoperative complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: RFS and PRFS rates were significantly prolonged after CRS plus HIPEC, whereas postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were not increased. Therefore, curative CRS plus HIPEC may be considered a treatment strategy for selected patients with resectable CPM and low PCI scores.

Intussusception induced by gastrointestinal metastasis of malignant melanoma: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Malignant melanoma sometimes metastasizes to small intestine, and could cause various clinical symptoms, including intussusception. Among the acute abdomen cohort in Japan, it is quite rare to encounter this entity. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 68-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital with chief complaints of abdominal pain and vomiting.　He underwent tumor resection for malignant melanoma of the primary lesion at left foot base, local recurrence and brain metastasis during the last five years. At admission, abdominal X-ray demonstrated small bowel obstruction. An ileus tube was inserted, and contrast media enema study showed crab-like shadow defect was observed in the advanced part. Enhanced computed tomography showed intussusception in the proximal jejunum caused by a tumor of 5 cm in diameter in the advanced part. No other intestinal lesion was found. Diagnosis of intussusception caused by solitary metastasis of malignant melanoma was made. Laparoscopic partial resection of the small intestine was performed. Postoperative course was uneventful, and patient was followed in outpatient clinic without further treatment with any recurrence of disease for one years. DISCUSSION: Malignant melanoma tends to metastases to the small intestine simultaneously and multiply. It bothers surgeons to decide range of small intestinal resection at emergency surgery. In the present study, preoperative examination allowed the adequate range of intestinal resection including location and number of metastases before operation. CONCLUSION: When an acute abdomen caused by intestinal metastasis of malignant melanoma was consulted, surgeon should make effort to identify location and number of metastatic lesion, preoperatively.

Exploring optimal examination to detect occult anastomotic leakage after rectal resection in patients with diverting stoma.

BACKGROUND: When considering "early stoma closure", both standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria and standardized methods to assess anastomosis are necessary to reduce the risk of occult anastomotic leakage (AL). However, in the immediate postoperative period, neither have the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients with diverting stoma (DS) been clarified nor have methods to assess anastomosis been standardized. The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients who had undergone rectal resection with DS and to evaluate the significance of computed tomography (CT) following water-soluble contrast enema (CE) to detect occult anastomotic leakage. METHODS: This was a single institutional prospective observational study of patients who had undergone rectal resection with the selective use of DS between May and October 2019. Fifteen patients had undergone CE and CT to assess for AL on postoperative day (POD) 7, and CT was performed just after CE. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the relationship between preoperative variables and the incidence of occult AL on POD 7. RESULTS: The incidence of occult AL on postoperative day 7 was 6 of 15 (40%). Hand-sewn anastomosis, compared with stapled anastomosis, was a significant risk factor. Five more cases with occult AL that could not be detected with CE could be detected on CT following CE; CE alone had a 33% false-negative radiological result rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-sewn anastomosis appeared to be a risk factor for occult AL, and CE alone had a high false-negative radiological result rate. When considering the introduction of early stoma closure, stapled anastomosis and CT following CE could be an appropriate inclusion criterion and preoperative examination, respectively.