Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 46(3): 458-467, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35275415

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is underdiagnosed and undertreated in medical settings, in part due to a lack of AUD assessment instruments that are reliable and practical for use in routine care. This study evaluates the test-retest reliability of a patient-report Alcohol Symptom Checklist questionnaire when it is used in routine care, including primary care and mental health specialty settings. METHODS: We performed a pragmatic test-retest reliability study using electronic health record (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente Washington, an integrated health system in Washington state. The sample included 454 patients who reported high-risk drinking on a behavioral health screen and completed two Alcohol Symptom Checklists 1 to 21 days apart. Subgroups of these patients who completed both checklists in primary care (n = 271) or mental health settings (n = 79) were also examined. The primary measure was an Alcohol Symptom Checklist on which patients self-reported whether they experienced each of the 11 AUD criteria within the past year, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th edition (DSM-5). RESULTS: Alcohol Symptom Checklists completed in routine care and documented in EHRs had excellent test-retest reliability for measuring AUD criterion counts (ICC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.82). Test-retest reliability estimates were also high and not significantly different for the subsamples of patients who completed both checklists in primary care (ICC = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.85) or mental health settings (ICC = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.83). Test-retest reliability was not moderated by having a past two-year AUD diagnosis, nor by the age or sex of the patient completing it. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol Symptom Checklists can reliably and pragmatically assess AUD criteria in routine care among patients who screen positive for high-risk drinking. The Alcohol Symptom Checklist may be a valuable tool in supporting AUD-related care and monitoring AUD criteria longitudinally in routine primary care and mental health settings.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Lista de Verificación , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
2.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 13(6): 32-40, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17985809

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Preliminary studies of body therapy for women in trauma recovery suggest positive results but are not specific to women with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and chronic pain. OBJECTIVE AND PARTICIPANTS: To examine the feasibility and acceptability of body-oriented therapy for female veterans with PTSD and chronic pain taking prescription analgesics. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 2-group, randomized, repeated-measures design was employed. Female veterans (N=14) were recruited from a Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system in the Northwest United States (VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington). Participants were assigned to either treatment as usual (TAU) or treatment as usual and 8 weekly individual body-oriented therapy sessions (mindful awareness in body-oriented therapy group). MEASURES: Written questionnaires and interviews were used to assess intervention acceptability; reliable and valid measures were administered at 3 time points to evaluate measurement acceptability and performance; and within-treatment process measures and a participant post-intervention questionnaire assessed treatment fidelity. INTERVENTION: A body-oriented therapy protocol, "Mindful Awareness in Body-oriented Therapy" (MABT) was used. This is a mind-body approach that incorporates massage, mindfulness, and the emotional processing of psychotherapy. RESULTS: Over 10 weeks of recruitment, 31 women expressed interest in study participation. The primary reason for exclusion was the lack of prescription analgesic use for chronic pain. Study participants adhered to study procedures, and 100% attended at least 7 of 8 sessions; all completed in-person post-treatment assessment. Written questionnaires about intervention experience suggest increased tools for pain relief/relaxation, increased body/mind connection, and increased trust/safety. Ten of 14 responded to mailed 3-month follow-up. The response-to-process measures indicated the feasibility of implementing the manualized protocol and point to the need for longer sessions and a longer intervention period with this population.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Relaciones Metafisicas Mente-Cuerpo , Manejo del Dolor , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Veteranos/psicología , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Salud de la Mujer
3.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 76(2): 165-71, 2004 Nov 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15488340

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently attention has focused on the assessment of functional health status in substance-dependent individuals. The addiction severity index (ASI) is a widely used assessment instrument that includes scales to reflect current medical and psychiatric status. This study examines the concurrent validity of these ASI composite scores in relation to the short form 36-item health survey (SF-36), a well-established measure of health-related quality of life/functional health status. METHODS: Veterans (n=674) were assessed at admission to substance dependence treatment. Correlations were performed between ASI composite scores and SF-36 scales and the physical and mental summary components (PSC and MSC, respectively). Areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined the descriminative ability of the ASI composites to ascertain impairment. RESULTS: The ASI medical composite score demonstrated robust correlations with the four SF-36 scales that relate to physical health and with the PCS. The ASI psychiatric composite score had robust correlations with the four SF-36 scales related to mental health and with the mental component summary (MCS). ROC curves indicated that the ASI medical (AUC=0.83) and psychiatric composites (AUC=0.90) accurately detected subjects with impairment. CONCLUSIONS: ASI medical and psychiatric composite scores provide effective initial screening for patients with impaired functional status as measured by the corresponding SF-36 component summary scores.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Determinación de la Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Veteranos/psicología , Actividades Cotidianas/clasificación , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Alcoholismo/psicología , Alcoholismo/rehabilitación , Comorbilidad , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Psicometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Derivación y Consulta , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA