RESUMEN
Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), which include a range of pathologies affecting bones, cartilage, muscles, tendons, and ligaments, account for a significant portion of the global burden of disease. While pharmaceutical and surgical interventions represent conventional approaches for treating MSDs, their efficacy is constrained and frequently accompanied by adverse reactions. Considering the rising incidence of MSDs, there is an urgent demand for effective treatment modalities to alter the current landscape. Phototherapy, as a controllable and non-invasive technique, has been shown to directly regulate bone, cartilage, and muscle regeneration by modulating cellular behavior. Moreover, phototherapy presents controlled ablation of tumor cells, bacteria, and aberrantly activated inflammatory cells, demonstrating therapeutic potential in conditions such as bone tumors, bone infection, and arthritis. By constructing light-responsive nanosystems, controlled drug delivery can be achieved to enable precise treatment of MSDs. Notably, various phototherapy nanoplatforms with integrated imaging capabilities have been utilized for early diagnosis, guided therapy, and prognostic assessment of MSDs, further improving the management of these disorders. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the strategies and recent advances in the application of phototherapy for the treatment of MSDs, discusses the challenges and prospects of phototherapy, and aims to promote further research and application of phototherapy techniques.
RESUMEN
Objective: Despite the significant function of lymphatics in wound healing, and frequent clinical use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT), the effect of mechanical force application on lymphangiogenesis remains to be elucidated. We utilize a murine incisional wound healing model to assess the mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis following NPWT. Approach: Dorsal incisional skin wounds were created on diabetic mice (genetically obese leptin receptor-deficient mice [db/db]; n = 30) and covered with an occlusive dressing (Control, n = 15) or NPWT (-125 mmHg, continuous, 24 h for 7 days; NPWT, n = 15). The wounds were macroscopically assessed for 28 days. Tissue was harvested on day 10 for analysis. Qualitative functional analysis of lymphatic drainage was performed on day 28 using Evans Blue staining (n = 2). Results: NPWT increased lymphatic vessel density (40 ± 20 vs. 12 ± 6 podoplanin [PDPN]+ and 25 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8 lymphatic vessel endothelial receptor 1 [LYVE-1]+) and vessel diameter (28 ± 9 vs. 12 ± 2 µm). Western blotting verified the upregulation of LYVE-1 with NPWT. Leukocyte presence was higher with NPWT (22% ± 3.7% vs. 9.1% ± 4.1% lymphocyte common antigen [CD45]+) and the leukocytes were predominately B cells clustered within vessels (8.8% ± 2.5% vs. 18% ± 3.6% B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 [CD20]+). Macrophage presence was lower in the NPWT group. Lymphatic drainage was increased in the NPWT group, which exhibited greater Evans Blue positivity. Innovation: The lymphangiogenic effects take place independent of macrophage infiltration, appearing to correlate with B cell presence. Conclusion: NPWT promotes lymphangiogenesis in incisional wounds, significantly increasing the lymph vessel density and diameter. This study highlights the potential of NPWT to stimulate lymphatic drainage and wound healing of surgical incisions.