Medial olivocochlear reflex reliability: The effects of averaging and presence of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR), usually assessed by the inhibition of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) with contralateral noise, is a very small effect. In understanding the origin of the MOCR, it is crucial to obtain data of the highest accuracy, i.e., with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which in turn largely depends on the number of signal averages. This study investigates how the reliability of MOCR measures is affected by the number of averages. At the same time, the effect of the presence of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs) is taken into account, as it is known that this factor significantly affects TEOAE amplitudes and SNRs. Each recording session consisted of two series of four measurements, allowing comparison of MOCR magnitude based on 250, 500, 750, and 1000 averages. Reliability was based on comparing the two series. The results show that, for a good quality MOCR measure (i.e., intraclass correlation above 0.9), the required number of averages is at least double that obtainable from a standard TEOAE test (i.e., 500 compared to 250). Ears without SSOAEs needed a higher number of averages to reach a correlation of 0.9 than ears with SSOAEs.

Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.

It has been reported that both click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) have higher amplitudes in ears that possess spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs). The general aim of the present study was to investigate whether the presence of spontaneous activity in the cochlea affected tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs). As a benchmark, the study also measured growth functions of CEOAEs. Spontaneous activity in the cochlea was measured by the level of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs), an emission evoked by a click but closely related to spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs, which are detectable without any stimulus). Measurements were made on a group of 15 adults whose ears were categorized as either having recordable SSOAEs or no SSOAEs. In each ear, CEOAEs and TBOAEs were registered at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, and input/output functions were measured at 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 dB SPL. Global and half-octave-band values of response level and latency were estimated. Our main finding was that in ears with spontaneous activity, TBOAEs had higher levels than in ears without. The difference was more apparent for global values, but were also seen with half-octave-band analysis. Input/output functions had similar growth rates for ears with and without SSOAEs. There were no significant differences in latencies between TBOAEs from ears with and without SSOAEs, although latencies tended to be longer for lower stimulus levels and lower stimulus frequencies. When TBOAE levels were compared to CEOAE levels, the latter showed greater differences between recordings from ears with and without SSOAEs. Although TBOAEs reflect activity from a more restricted cochlear region than CEOAEs, at all stimulus frequencies their behavior still depends on whether SSOAEs are present or not.

Tonotopic organisation of the auditory cortex in sloping sensorineural hearing loss.

Although the tonotopic organisation of the human primary auditory cortex (PAC) has already been studied, the question how its responses are affected in sensorineural hearing loss remains open. Twenty six patients (aged 38.1 ± 9.1 years; 12 men) with symmetrical sloping sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and 32 age- and gender-matched controls (NH) participated in an fMRI study using a sparse protocol. The stimuli were binaural 8s complex tones with central frequencies of 400 HzCF, 800 HzCF, 1600 HzCF, 3200 HzCF, or 6400 HzCF, presented at 80 dB(C). In NH responses to all frequency ranges were found in bilateral auditory cortices. The outcomes of a winnermap approach, showing a relative arrangement of active frequency-specific areas, was in line with the existing literature and revealed a V-shape high-frequency gradient surrounding areas that responded to low frequencies in the auditory cortex. In SNHL frequency-specific auditory cortex responses were observed only for sounds from 400 HzCF to 1600 HzCF, due to the severe or profound hearing loss in higher frequency ranges. Using a stringent statistical threshold (p < 0.05; FWE) significant differences between NH and SNHL were only revealed for mid and high-frequency sounds. At a more lenient statistical threshold (p < 0.001, FDRc), however, the size of activation induced by 400 HzCF in PAC was found statistically larger in patients with a prelingual, as compared to a postlingual onset of hearing loss. In addition, this low-frequency range was more extensively represented in the auditory cortex when outcomes obtained in all patients were contrasted with those revealed in normal hearing individuals (although statistically significant only for the secondary auditory cortex). The outcomes of the study suggest preserved patterns of large-scale tonotopic organisation in SNHL which can be further refined following auditory experience, especially when the hearing loss occurs prelingually. SNHL can induce both enlargement and reduction of the extent of responses in the topically organized auditory cortex.

Otoacoustic emissions in newborns evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts.

BACKGROUND: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are currently widely used in newborn hearing screening programs. OAEs evoked by transients (TEOAEs) in newborns are usually characterized by large response levels at higher frequencies but lower frequencies are affected by physiological noise. The purpose of the present study was to acquire responses at lower frequencies by measuring OAEs evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts (TBOAEs). METHODS: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were recorded from 49 newborns. Measurements were made using the ILO 292 equipment from Otodynamics. In each ear, three measurements were made: first with a standard click stimulus at 80dB pSPL (CEOAEs), a second using a 0.5kHz tone burst at 80dB pSPL (TBOAEs), and a third recording of spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs). Global and half-octave-band values of OAE signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and response level were used to assess statistical differences between CEOAEs and 0.5kHz TBOAEs. Additionally, time-frequency (TF) analysis of signals was performed using the matching pursuit method. RESULTS: Global levels were highest for CEOAEs. However, at low frequencies (0.7-1kHz), 0.5kHz TBOAEs had significantly higher levels and SNRs than CEOAEs. At these frequencies, SNRs of CEOAEs were usually below 0dB. At 0.5kHz there were no statistically significant differences between CEOAEs and TBOAEs. In ears with recordable SOAEs, CEOAEs and TBOAEs had higher levels and SNRs than in ears without SOAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 0.5kHz TBOAEs may be a useful addition to standard CEOAE tests in newborns. They provide information about lower frequencies, a region where CEOAEs are usually prone to noise. The presence of SOAEs affects the magnitudes of both CEOAEs and TBOAEs.

Repeatability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in young adults.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and variability of TEOAE characteristics in hearing screening tests performed under practical conditions on normal subjects. MATERIAL/METHODS: A group of 11 young, normal-hearing subjects aged 19-24 years was tested. They were examined otologically and audiologically prior to the tests and no ear pathologies were found. Responses were acquired with a commercially available instrument (Integrity, Vivosonic Inc.) using a standardized OAE protocol. The TEOAE tests were repeated 3 times in each subject at random intervals within 24 h. The analyzed parameters of interest were: (i) whole wave reproducibility (WWR) and; (ii) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). RESULTS: WWR and SNR did not differ significantly among the 3 measurement sessions. In most cases the differences in WWR among measurements were around 1-2% and for SNRs they were 1-4 dB SNRs and were highest in the 1-2 kHz range. TEOAE-based tests can be useful tools for hearing screening. CONCLUSIONS: The tests can give reliable results provided that adequate procedures are used and low-noise conditions are ensured. The tests are best complemented with other examinations to widen the range of ear pathologies able to be detected.

Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the properties of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked by chirp stimuli and compare them with standard click-evoked OAEs. Differences between evoked OAEs in children with and without spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) were also assessed. METHODS: OAEs were first recorded from 54 children (age 4-10 years) in a screening setup. In each ear five OAE measurements were made using two types of chirps (7.5 ms and 10.5 ms) at around 70 dB pSPL; clicks at 70 and 80 dB pSPL; and a standard synchronized SOAE stimulation protocol. Tympanometry was also conducted. Pass/refer criteria based on signal to noise ratios (SNRs) were applied to all OAEs. Pass/refer rates from all methods (OAEs evoked by chirps and clicks, and tympanometry) were compared. Additionally, half-octave-band values of OAE SNRs and response levels were used to assess statistical differences. RESULTS: Chirp-evoked OAEs generated a similar number of passes to click-evoked OAEs when the same level of stimulus was used. When using lower stimulus levels, both chirp- and click-evoked OAEs diagnosed nearly all ears that failed tympanometry. The response levels and SNRs of OAEs evoked by clicks and chirps were very similar. The highest response levels were in the 1.4 kHz half-octave band. The SNRs for ears with SOAEs were highest at 1.4 kHz, whereas they were at 4 kHz for ears without SOAEs. Both response levels and SNRs were higher by about 5 dB for ears with SOAEs than ears without SOAEs. Also all ears with SOAEs generated a pass result in screening, while ears without SOAEs gave a pass less frequently (at least 30% fewer cases). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that performance of chirp-evoked OAEs for screening purposes is similar to click-evoked OAEs when the same stimulus level is applied. OAEs evoked with lower stimulus levels (70 vs. 80 dB pSPL) are more sensitive to middle ear pathology. The presence of SOAEs significantly influences the pass rates of OAEs evoked by chirps and clicks.

Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) and tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (TBOAEs) in identifying the residual hearing of subjects with partial deafness (PD)--a condition in which subjects have normal thresholds at low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss at high frequencies. DESIGN: Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) were measured in 23 subjects with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, 46 with PD, and 15 with normal hearing (NH). The PD subjects were divided into three subgroups according to the frequency at which hearing loss started: PD250 (NH up to 250 Hz)--20 ears; PD500 (NH to 500 Hz)--18 ears; and PD1000 (NH up to 1000 Hz)--20 ears. Standard-click stimuli, and 0.5- and 1-kHz tone bursts (average amplitude 80 ± 3 peak dB SPL, nonlinear averaging protocol), were used. The tone bursts were four cycles long with equal rise/fall times and no plateau. Recordings were performed in two acquisition windows: a standard one 20-msec wide for clicks and 1-kHz tone bursts, and one 30-msec wide for 0.5-kHz tone bursts. OAE response levels, signal-to-noise ratios, and reproducibility were examined in terms of wide-band responses and in terms of half-octave bands centered at 0.5 and 1 kHz. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was used to determine which type of stimuli best differentiates partially deaf subjects from subjects with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss through the range 125 to 8000 Hz. RESULTS: Nearly all recordings from groups PD500 and PD1000 showed 0.5-kHz TBOAEs. By contrast, 1-kHz TBOAEs and CEOAEs were generally found only in the PD1000 group. It was also possible to detect 0.5-kHz TBOAE responses in approximately 50% of ears from the PD250 group. Receiver operator characteristic analysis demonstrated that click and 1-kHz tone bursts provide a good diagnostic measure of residual hearing even when hearing loss starts as low as 1 kHz; moreover, the 0.5-kHz TBOAE could identify residual hearing when hearing loss started just > 0.5 kHz, a situation in which clicks failed to elicit a response. In the case of partially deaf subjects, diagnosis was more accurate when OAEs were analyzed by 1/2 octave bands. Furthermore, the use of a 0.5-kHz tone burst gave responses in the highest number of subjects, even when there were hearing losses in neighboring bands. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a 0.5-kHz TBOAE is a more powerful test than the standard CEOAE when cochlear function at low frequencies is of interest. The 0.5-kHz TBOAE may be used to identify partial deafness in patients who generally fail to show a response to the commonly used clicks. In addition, use of 1/2 octave-band filtering can increase the reproducibility and power of the test.

Otoacoustic emissions in neonates measured with different acquisition protocols.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the properties of neonatal transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) recorded with three most popular stimulation protocols. Differences between the recorded TEOAEs with and without spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), were also assessed. In addition two more issues were addressed: (i) the effect of windowing on the TEOAE responses; and (ii) the contribution of the TEOAE segment from 12.5 to 20 ms to the overall TEOAE response. METHODS: TEOAEs and SOAEs were recorded from 50 normal hearing neonates using linear, non-linear, QuickScreen and standard synchronized SOAE stimulation protocols. Global and half-octave-band values of TEOAE reproducibility and response level were used to assess statistical differences in the recorded responses. Furthermore protocol differences were evaluated in different recording windows from 2.5 to 12.5 and 12 to 20 ms. RESULTS: Data from the linear protocol presented TEOAE parameters with the highest values. The differences between recordings with longer and shorter acquisition windows were especially apparent in 1-1.4 kHz frequency range. Furthermore the data have shown that the low frequency TEOAE components are a significant part of the TEOAE response, especially in ears without SOAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that TEOAE protocols using short recording windows (i.e. QuickScreen) can be used only for a fast detection of a valid TEOAE. For more sophisticated clinical analyses the standard 20 ms TEOAE recording window is more appropriate. The presence of SOAEs significantly influences TEOAEs. Ears with SOAEs presented higher values of TEOAE parameters especially in the 2-4 kHz range. On the other hand, in the ears without SOAEs low frequency components contribute more to the signal.

Masking level difference in an adaptive procedure for clinical investigation.

OBJECTIVE: Masking level difference (MLD) tests are an established component of auditory processing test batteries; however, normative data for these tests vary according to procedure. The purpose of this study was to establish a standardized procedure for clinical use in the measurement of the MLD. DESIGN: A newly developed computer software program using both an adaptive procedure (MLDA) and a Békésy procedure (MLDB) was evaluated in this study. STUDY SAMPLE: Forty normal-hearing, native-English speaking adults between the ages of 18 and 26 years were included in the study. RESULTS: Both the MLDA and MLDB procedures showed statistically significant sex differences in the masked thresholds used to obtain the MLD, but not for the calculated MLD value; hence, normative data need not be reported separately by sex. Furthermore, statistically significant differences between procedures were observed, with the MLDA procedure producing higher MLDs. The MLDA procedure permitted a d' analysis, which could not be determined using the MLDB procedure. For MLDA, d' = 1.4, test sensitivity = 96.4%, and test specificity = 60.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that MLDA is a more efficient testing procedure due to MLDA's higher MLD average and the statistical data available (d', and measures of sensitivity and specificity).

A connection between the Efferent Auditory System and Noise-Induced Tinnitus Generation. Reduced contralateral suppression of TEOAEs in patients with noise-induced tinnitus.

BACKGROUND: Subjective tinnitus is an auditory perception that is not caused by external stimulation, its source being anywhere in the auditory system. Furthermore, evidence exists that exposure to noise alters cochlear micromechanics, either directly or through complex feed-back mechanisms, involving the medial olivocochlear efferent system. The aim of this study was to assess the role of the efferent auditory system in noise-induced tinnitus generation. MATERIAL/METHODS: Contralateral sound-activated suppression of TEOAEs was performed in a group of 28 subjects with noise-induced tinnitus (NIT) versus a group of 35 subjects with normal hearing and tinnitus, without any history of exposure to intense occupational or recreational noise (idiopathic tinnitus-IT). Thirty healthy, normally hearing volunteers were used as controls for the efferent suppression test. RESULTS: Suppression of the TEOAE amplitude less than 1 dB SPL was considered abnormal, giving a false positive rate of 6.7%. Eighteen out of 28 (64.3%) patients of the NIT group and 9 out of 35 (25.7%) patients of the IT group showed abnormal suppression values, which were significantly different from the controls' (p<0.0001 and p<0.045, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The abnormal activity of the efferent auditory system in NIT cases might indicate that either the activity of the efferent fibers innervating the outer hair cells (OHCs) is impaired or that the damaged OHCs themselves respond abnormally to the efferent stimulation.

Threshold estimation in adult normal- and impaired-hearing subjects using auditory steady-state responses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the estimation of hearing threshold values by behavioral and electrophysiological (ASSR) methods in subjects with normal hearing and those with sensorineural hearing impairment. MATERIAL/METHODS: Thirty-two subjects (17 male and 15 female) were tested, with a total of 61 ears. Of these, 11 (22 ears) presented normal hearing threshold values (0-19 dBHL) and 21 (39 ears) sensorineural deficits. RESULTS: The data showed that for the normal-hearing subjects the mean +/-SD ASSR threshold was approximately 20+/-11 dB for frequencies of 0.25-1.0 kHz. For higher frequencies the ASSR threshold increased to 40+/-12.5 dB at 8.0 kHz. Regression analysis confirmed that the difference between the ASSR-estimated and behavioral threshold values decreased significantly with the amount of hearing loss. The data showed that for a 10-dB increment of the behavioral threshold, the ASSR threshold increased by 7 dB. The difference of about 27 dB between the two methods observed in normal subjects tends to cancel in hearing loss greater than 95-100 dBHL. CONCLUSIONS: The results of these analyses indicate that the threshold estimates are rather discordant with the behavioral thresholds. in particular it seems that the correction factor applied here does not rely on factors adequately modeled (in terms of instrumentation) to compensate for the effects of hearing loss on ASSR thresholds. The threshold estimation is adequately modeled for high levels of hearing loss, particularly for patients requiring a cochlear implant.

Estimation of pure-tone thresholds in adults using extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output-functions and auditory steady state responses.

Pure-tone thresholds were used as the reference and compared with extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output-functions and auditory steady state responses (ASSR) in hearing-impaired adults, using the Cochlea-Scan and Audera devices. Fifty-three subjects presenting sensorineural deficits were included in the study. The DPOAE data were recorded using the detailed Cochlea-Scan threshold modality, and ASSR responses were assessed at 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz. The comparison between DPOAE and ASSR threshold values indicated significant mean differences across all tested frequencies. Significant relationships were observed between the behavioral and the DPOAE measurements in the lower frequencies (1.5 and 2.0 kHz). The Cochlea-Scan algorithm seems to overestimate hearing threshold. Logistic regression models (probability of DPOAE response p = 0.9), suggested that the identifiable hearing levels are less than 34 dB HL (at 2.0 and 4.0 kHz) and less or equal to 38 and 40 dB HL at 1.5 and 6.0 kHz respectively. The Cochlea-Scan DPOAE protocols can be used in cases presenting mild hearing deficits (i.e.<40 dB HL).

Bilateral electric stimulation from auditory brainstem implants in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2.

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in the field of electronic hearing prostheses have allowed for the introduction of auditory brainstem implants in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. CASE REPORT: Bilateral electric stimulation from 2 sequentially placed auditory brainstem implants was applied in a 27-year-old man with neurofibromatosis type 2. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present case support further application of bilateral electric stimulation from auditory brainstem implants for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2.