Occurrence of primarily noninducible atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia after radiofrequency delivery in the slow pathway region during empirical slow pathway modulation.

BACKGROUND: The first-line therapy for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is catheter-based slow pathway modulation. If AVNRT is not inducible during an electrophysiological study, an empirical slow pathway modulation (ESPM) may be considered in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal physiology and/or a typical electrocardiogram (ECG). METHODS: We screened 149 symptomatic patients who underwent ESPM in our department between 1993 and 2013. All patients fulfilled the following criteria: (1) either dual atrioventricular nodal (AVN) physiology with up to 2 AVN echo beats or characteristic ECG documentation or both, (2) noninducibility of AVNRT by programmed stimulation, and (3) completion of a telephone questionnaire for long-term follow-up. Out of this population we retrospectively investigated 13 patients who were primarily noninducible but in whom an AVNRT occurred during or after radiofrequency (RF) delivery. RESULTS: When AVNRT occurred, the procedure lost its empirical character, and RF delivery was continued until the procedural endpoint of noninducibility of AVNRT. This endpoint was reached in all but one patient (92%). After a follow-up of 73 ± 15 months, this patient was the only one who reported no benefit from the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Out of 149 initially noninducible patients, a considerable number (9%) exhibited AVNRT during or after RF delivery. These patients crossed over from empirical to controlled slow pathway modulation resulting in a good clinical outcome. Our observations should encourage electrophysiologists to repeat programmed stimulation even after initial empirical RF delivery to retest for inducibility.

Comparison of vernakalant and ranolazine in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend vernakalant for pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation. However, this drug is not established as chronic therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 15 rabbit hearts were Langendorff-perfused. A burst pacing protocol-induced atrial fibrillation in 7 of 15 hearts at baseline (10 episodes). Subsequently, a combination of acetylcholine and isoproterenol (ACH/ISO) has been administered to increase occurrence of atrial fibrillation resulting in a reduction of atrial action potential duration (-25 ms, P < 0.05) as well as atrial effective refractory period (aERP; -36 ms, P < 0.05). Then, atrial fibrillation occurred in all 15 hearts (124 episodes). Additional treatment with vernakalant (10 µmol/l) induced a significant reduction of atrial fibrillation (6 of 15 hearts, 63 episodes). Infusion of vernakalant did not significantly alter atrial action potential duration (+8 ms) but increased aERP (+16 ms, P < 0.05 as compared with ACH/ISO).Results were compared to 12 further rabbit hearts treated with ranolazine. Late sodium current inhibition by ranolazine also induced a significant increase of aERP. Here, atrial fibrillation was inducible after ranolazine infusion in 6 of 12 hearts (46 episodes). Of note, 10 of 12 hearts presented atrial fibrillation during sole treatment with ACH/ISO (174 episodes). CONCLUSION: Vernakalant and ranolazine demonstrated a comparable antiarrhythmic efficacy. Therefore, vernakalant treatment may represent a potential therapeutic option to reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Colchicine Increases Ventricular Vulnerability in an Experimental Whole-Heart Model.

The traditional gout medication colchicine has been reported to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation or cardiac surgery in a few clinical trials. Severe adverse events have not yet been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess possible direct electrophysiological effects in an experimental whole-heart model. Ten rabbit hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused. Thereafter, colchicine was administered in two concentrations (1 and 3 µM). Eight endo- and epicardial monophasic action potentials and a 12-lead ECG showed a stable QT interval and action potential duration during colchicine infusion. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in dispersion of repolarization. However, colchicine induced a dose-dependent significant decrease of effective refractory period (ERP; 1 µM: -19 ms, 3 µM: -22 ms; p < 0.05). In the present study, acute infusion of colchicine in isolated rabbit hearts resulted in a reduction of ERP in the presence of a stable myocardial repolarization. This led to a significantly elevated inducibility of ventricular fibrillation. In 4 of 10 hearts, incessant ventricular fibrillation occurred. These results suggest a pro-arrhythmic or toxic effect of colchicine and underline that further clinical studies on potential adverse effects should be conducted before the drug can be recommended for routine use after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Impact of acute atrial fibrillation termination and prolongation of atrial fibrillation cycle length on the outcome of ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A substudy of the STAR AF II trial.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the impact of acute atrial fibrillation (AF) termination and prolongation of atrial fibrillation cycle length (AFCL) during ablation on long-term procedural outcome. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of AF termination and AFCL prolongation on freedom from AF in patients from the STAR AF II (Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial-Part II) trial. METHODS: Acute changes in AFCL and AF termination were collected during the index procedure of the STAR AF II trial and compared to recurrence of AF at 18 months. Recurrence was assessed by ECG, Holter (3, 6, 9, 12, 18 months), and weekly transtelephonic ECG monitoring for 18 months. RESULTS: AF terminated in 8% of the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) arm, 45% in the PVI+complex electrogram arm, and 22% of the PVI+linear ablation arm (P <.001), but freedom from AF did not differ among the 3 groups (P = .15). Freedom from AF was significantly higher in patients who presented to the laboratory in sinus rhythm (SR) compared to those without AF termination (63% vs 44%, P = .007). Patients with AF termination had an intermediate outcome (53%) that was not significantly different from those in SR (P = .84) or those who did not terminate (P = .08). AF termination was a univariable predictor of success (P = .007), but by multivariable analysis, presence of early SR was the strongest predictor of success (hazard ratio 0.67, P = .004). Prolongation of AFCL was not predictive of 18-month freedom from AF. CONCLUSION: Acute AF termination and prolongation in AFCL did not consistently predict 18-month freedom from AF. Presence of SR before or early during the ablation was the strongest predictor of better outcome.

Spatial Relationships of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms and Continuous Electrical Activity to Focal Electrical Sources: Implications for Substrate Ablation in Human Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the spatial relationships of focal electrical sources (FSs) to complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) and continuous electrical activity (CEA). BACKGROUND: Fractionated atrial electrograms have been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers in computational studies and represent ablation targets in the management of persistent AF. METHODS: We included a subset of 66 patients (age: 63 [56, 67] years, 69% persistent AF) with electroanatomic data from the SELECT AF (Selective complex fractionated atrial electrograms targeting for atrial fibrillation) randomized control trial that compared the efficacy of CFAE with CEA ablation in AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein antral ablation. Focal sources were identified based on bipolar electrogram periodicity and QS unipolar electrogram morphology. RESULTS: A total of 77 FSs (median: 1 [1st quartile, 3rd quartile: 1, 2] per patient) were identified most commonly in the pulmonary vein antrum and left atrial appendage. The proportions of FSs inside CFAE and CEA regions were similar (13% vs. 1.3%, respectively; p = 0.13). Focal sources were more likely to be on the border zone of CFAEs than in CEAs (49% vs. 7.8%, respectively; p = 0.012). Following ablation, 53% of patients had ≥1 unablated extrapulmonary vein FS. The median number of unablated FS was higher in patients with AF recurrence post ablation than in patients without (median: 1 [0, 1] vs. 0 [0, 1], respectively; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: One-half of the FSs detected during AF localized to the border of CFAE areas, whereas most of the FSs were found outside CEA areas. CFAE or CEA ablation leaves a number of FS unablated, which is associated with AF recurrence. These findings suggest that many CFAEs may arise from passive wave propagation, remote from FS, which may limit their therapeutic efficacy in AF substrate modification.

Ventricular arrhythmias from the mitral annulus: patient characteristics, electrophysiological findings, ablation, and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic, premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) frequently originate in the right ventricular outflow tract, less frequently in the left ventricular outflow tract, aortic root, or mitral annulus (MA). Little is known about the patient population presenting with MA PVC and/or ventricular tachycardia (VT). OBJECTIVE: To characterize the subgroup of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the MA. METHODS: Among 404 consecutive patients who presented for catheter ablation of idiopathic PVC/VT over a period of 9 years, patients who were found to have an ablation site at the MA were analyzed for clinical and electrophysiological parameters. RESULTS: Twenty-two (5%) patients (mean age 45 ± 18 years; range 16-76 years; 14 [64%] men) had PVC/VT arising from the MA. History of PVC ranged from 2 days in a case with suspected focal myocarditis to 19 years. No patient had severely depressed left ventricular function or significant heart disease, which was determined by echocardiogram, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or coronary angiogram. Sites of origin were distributed around the MA with no preferential area. Ablation was successful in 13 of 16 (81%) patients. One 28-year-old female patient with normal magnetic resonance imaging and no structural heart disease died suddenly 3 months after ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular arrhythmias from the MA represent a rare subgroup of idiopathic PVC/VT. They appear to occur at any age and do not indicate underlying structural heart disease. Catheter ablation has a success rate comparable to that of outflow tract tachycardia. Prognosis remains unclear.

Electrophysiological characteristics of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in cardiac sarcoidosis versus arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) can manifest very similarly. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there are significant demographic and electrophysiological differences between patients with CS and ARVC. METHODS: We prospectively compared patients with proven CS or ARVC who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias by using 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the diagnostic criteria for ARVC would have excluded ARVC in patients with CS. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (13 men; mean age 44.9 years) were included. All 18 patients had mild to moderately reduced right ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (n = 8) had a significantly lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction (35.6±19.3 vs 60.6±9.4; P = .002). Patients with CS had a significantly wider QRS (0.146 vs 0.110s; P = .004). Five of 8 (63%) patients with CS fulfilled the diagnostic ARVC criteria. Ventricular tachycardias (VTs) with a left bundle branch block pattern were documented in all but one patient (with CS). Programmed ventricular stimulation induced an average of 3.7 different monomorphic VTs in patients with CS vs 1.8 in patients with ARVC (P = .01). VT significantly more often originated in the apical region of the right ventricle in CS vs ARVC (P = .001), with no other predilection sites. Ablation success and other electrophysiological parameters were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The current diagnostic ARVC guidelines do not reliably exclude patients with CS. Clinical and electrophysiological parameters that were characteristic of CS in our patients include reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, a significantly wider QRS, right-sided apical VT, and more inducible forms of monomorphic VT.