Treatment Rationale and Study Design for Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of UFT/LV for Stage II Colorectal Cancer With Risk Factors for Recurrence (JFMC46-1201).

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer has not been established. Meanwhile, the presence of stage II colon cancer with high-risk factors for recurrence has been reported. To our knowledge, no prospective study of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with high-risk factors has been implemented to date. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a prospective nonrandomized controlled study based on patients' selection of treatment option, including randomized therapeutic decision-making, to evaluate the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) for stage II colon cancer with high-risk factors for recurrence, compared with surgery alone. Five courses of UFT/LV therapy will be given as follows: UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) with LV (75 mg/d) will be orally administered in 3 doses per day. Treatment will be received daily for 28 days, followed by a 7-day rest or will be received daily for 5 days, followed by a 2-day rest. For both regimens, 1 course will last 5 weeks, and 5 courses will be given. The primary end point is disease-free survival. A propensity score matching will be conducted based on 7 variables that represent risk factors to minimize selection bias in a comparison between the nonrandomized arms. For this nonrandomized comparison, a target sample size is set at 1200 (400 and 800 patients for the surgery alone and UFT/LV groups, respectively) and 1720 patients will be enrolled. In this study we aim to evaluate the therapeutic usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT/LV for stage II colorectal cancer with risk factors for recurrence.

Safety analysis of two different regimens of uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer in a phase III trial comparing 6 with 18 months of treatment: JFMC33-0502 trial.

PURPOSE: The JFMC33-0502 trial is a phase III clinical study designed to determine the most appropriate duration of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with stage IIB or III colon cancer. We report the interim results of preplanned safety analyses. METHODS: Patients with stage IIB or III colon cancer who had undergone curative resection were randomly assigned to receive UFT (300 mg/m(2)) plus leucovorin (75 mg/day) for 6 months (control group, 4 weeks of treatment followed by a 1-week rest, five courses) or for 18 months (study group, 5 days of treatment followed by a 2-day rest, 15 courses). Treatment status and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,071 patients were enrolled, and 1,063 were included in safety analyses. Treatment completion rate at 6 months was 74.0 % in the control group and 76.7 % in the study group. Treatment completion rate in the study group at 18 months was 56.0 %. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 75.3 % in the control group and 77.6 % in the study group. The incidences of grade 3 or higher AEs were low in both groups. During the first 6 months, the incidences of the subjective AEs were significantly lower in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: Oral UFT plus leucovorin given by either dosage schedule is a very safe regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy. In particular, 5 days of treatment followed by a 2-day rest was a useful treatment option from the viewpoint of toxicity even when given for longer than 6 months.

Randomized trial of the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer with combination therapy incorporating the oral pyrimidine 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The purpose of the present trial was to clarify the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy including an oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug, the 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU), for the treatment of colon cancer. METHOD: Patients with clinical stage Dukes' B and C colon cancer, who had been treated surgically, were assigned to a chemotherapy group treated with mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and HCFU and to a control group that received no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 1,001 patients registered for the study, 17 (1.7%) were ineligible. The incidence of toxicity was significantly higher in the chemotherapy group than in the control group. However, there were few severe side effects and no deaths related to the treatment. Overall survival showed no significant difference between the groups. The disease-free survival or the recurrence-free intervals was significantly higher in the chemotherapy group than in the control group. The incidence of hepatic recurrence was significantly (P=0.003) lower in the chemotherapy group than in the control group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer, i.e., combined chemotherapy that included the 5-FU oral anticancer drug HCFU.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur for pathological stage III rectal cancer after mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although adjuvant radiotherapy was proved to be effective for local control of rectal cancer even after standardized mesorectal excision, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after such standardized surgery remains to be clarified. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a combination of uracil and tegafur for pathological stage III rectal cancer treated by standardized mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with completely resected stage III rectal cancer, who underwent standardized mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, to receive either oral uracil-tegafur (400 mg/m2 tegafur per day) for one year or no treatment. Standardization and quality control of the surgery and pathological techniques were ensured by use of the guidelines of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. The secondary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomized 276 patients. Excluding two ineligible patients, 274 were included in the analysis. Planned interim analysis 2 years after accrual termination revealed significant prolongation of relapse-free survival (P = 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.005) in the uracil-tegafur group. The 3-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 78 and 91% in the chemotherapy group and 60 and 81% in the surgery-alone group, respectively. Local recurrence rates were low in both groups. Grade 3 events occurred in 17% of the chemotherapy patients, but no grade 4 or more events occurred. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur improves survival of patients with stage III rectal cancer after standardized mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Significance of histologic type of primary lesion and metastatic lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in stage III colon cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate whether the histologic types of the primary lesion and of metastatic lymph nodes in Stage III colon cancer are useful as prognostic factors. The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized, controlled trial by using these prognostic factors as stratification criteria was also investigated. METHODS: Stage III colon cancer patients were enrolled and were divided into two groups: Group W, in which the histologic type of both primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes was well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; and Group U, in which the primary tumors and the metastatic lymph nodes were of any type other than well-differentiated. Group W patients were assigned to Treatment Arm A (surgery alone) or Arm B (surgery, then 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil); and Group U patients, to Treatment Arm C (same as B), and Arm D (surgery + 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil + mitomycin C). RESULTS: The Group W five-year survival rate was significantly superior to that in Group U (P = 0.0035). There was a better survival rate in Treatment Arm A than Arm B (P = 0.0321), but no difference between Treatment Arms C and D. CONCLUSIONS: In Stage III colon cancer, the prognosis of cases whose primary lesion and lymph node tissues are both well differentiated is extremely good. In such cases, it is possible for adjuvant chemotherapy to have a deleterious effect, and therefore, it is not recommended.

An individual patient data meta-analysis of adjuvant therapy with carmofur in patients with curatively resected colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oral carmofur, either as a single or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, has been used as adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected colon cancer patients. Past trials and meta-analyses indicate that it is somewhat effective in extending survival of patients with this cancer. The objective of this study was to perform a reappraisal of randomized clinical trials conducted in this regard. METHODS: We designed an individual patient-based meta-analysis of relevant clinical trials to examine the benefit of oral carmofur for curatively resected colon cancer in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: We analyzed individual patient data of three randomized clinical trials, which met the predetermined inclusion criteria. These three trials had a combined total of 2152 patients, carmofur as adjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery-alone, 5 years follow-up, intention-to-treat-based analytic strategy and similar end points (OS and DFS). In a pooled analysis, 5 year OS rates were 80.4 and 76.4%, and 5 year DFS rates 76.9 and 71.0%, respectively, in carmofur and surgery-alone group. Oral carmofur had significant advantage over surgery-alone in terms of both OS [pooled hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68-0.99; P = 0.043] and DFS (pooled hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI = 0.65-0.91; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: This individual patient-based meta-analysis demonstrated that oral carmofur significantly improves both OS and DFS in patients with curatively resected colon cancers.

A multicenter randomized study comparing 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion (ci) plus 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil and 5-FU ci alone in colorectal cancer.

To verify the effectiveness of oral 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (HCFU) in improving the surgical cure rate in advanced colorectal cancer, a multicenter randomized comparative study was conducted. A total of 429 patients who had had curative resection for stage II and III colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to a study group receiving a 14-day course of 5-FU continuous infusion (320 mg/m2/day) followed by oral HCFU for a year (300 mg/day), or to the control group receiving a 14-day course of 5-FU continuous infusion alone. In terms of background factors, no significant differences were found between the 214 patients in the study group and the 215 in the control group. Adverse reactions during the treatment were more frequently seen in the study group. But with few exceptions, the toxicities were mild and the compliance was acceptable. The 5-year overall survival rate of the study group was similar to that of the control group. The 5-year disease-free survival rate of the study group was better than that of the control group in the patients with colon cancer (hazard ratio=1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.38; p=0.037). However, this benefit was not seen in the patients with rectal cancer. A significant improvement in the disease-free survival rate was demonstrated through the addition of HCFU to 5-FU continuous infusion for the patients with colon cancer. The usefulness of oral fluoropyrimidine as an adjuvant for curative surgery for colon cancer was further warranted.

Randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of adjuvant immunochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, using different combinations of the intracutaneous streptococcal preparation OK-432 and the oral pyrimidines 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil and uracil/tegafur.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant immunochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, using different combinations of the intracutaneous streptococcal preparation OK-432 and the oral pyrimidines 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (carmofur, HCFU) and uracil/tegafur (UFT). METHODS: Patients with stage II, III, or IV (Dukes' B, C) colorectal cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups: an immunochemotherapy group (mitomycin C [MMC] + 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] + HCFU + OK-432), a chemotherapy group (MMC + 5-FU + HCFU), and a control group (surgery alone) for those with colon cancer (study 1); and an immunochemotherapy group (MMC + 5-FU + UFT + OK-432), a chemotherapy group (MMC + 5-FU + UFT), and a control group (surgery alone) for those with rectal cancer (study 2). RESULTS: A total of 760 patients with colon cancer and 669 patients with rectal cancer were entered into this randomized clinical trial (RCT). The incidence of side-effects was in the order of: immunochemotherapy group >> chemotherapy group >> control group in both the cohort of patients with colon cancer and the cohort with rectal cancer. In particular, the frequency of leucopenia and skin disorders was significantly higher than control groups. There were no severe adverse events such as death related to the adjuvant therapy. In both the colon cancer and rectal cancer cohorts, no significant difference in the 5-year survival rate and disease-free survival rate was noted among the three groups. CONCLUSION: The results of an RCT demonstrated that the combination of MMC + 5-FU + HCFU + OK-432 for colon cancer and that of MMC + 5-FU + UFT + OK-432 for rectal cancer could not prolong the survival of patients with surgically resected colorectal cancer, but that both combinations were well tolerated as adjuvant therapy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant immunochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, using different combinations of the intracutaneous streptococcal preparation OK-432 and the oral pyrimidines 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil (carmofur, HCFU) and uracil/tegafur (UFT).

Dynamic graciloplasty resulting fecal continence without electrical stimulation: report of a case.

A 32 year-old man received dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence due to a pelvic fracture. The perception of stool was obtained soon after the colostomy closure. Defecography and a manometric study showed that the patient could contract the transposed gracilis muscle independently. While the resting anal canal pressure remained low (52 cmH(2)O), he maintained excellent continence without stimulation. When stimulated, the anal canal pressure rose to 112 cmH(2)O. Electrical stimulation is therefore not always necessary for a good function after dynamic graciloplasty.

A randomized controlled trial of postoperative adjuvant immunochemotherapy for colorectal cancer with oral medicines.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy reportedly improves advanced colorectal cancer patients' survival, however, it is necessary to assess what regimens are useful. Doxifluridine (5'-DFUR) is an intermediate of capecitabine approved in Europe and USA to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. 5'-DFUR is metabolized to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by thymidine phosphorylase existing in tumor at high concentrations, suggesting high 5-FU levels in tumor tissues and lesser complications. Present study compared usefulness of 5'-DFUR to that of oral 5-FU. Patients were enrolled at 38 centers from April 1993 to September 1996. They had diagnosed colorectal cancer of TNM stages II and III, and underwent macroscopic curative resection. Patients were prestratified into colon or rectum cancer and allocated into either 5'-DFUR (5'-DFUR 460 mg/m(2)/day + PSK 3 g/day) or 5-FU (5-FU 115 mg/m(2)/day + PSK 3 g/day) group by dynamic randomization (stratification factors such as depth of tumor, degree of lymph node metastasis, and location of tumor). Drugs were orally administered daily from postoperative week 2 to 54, with 6 mg/m(2) mitomycin C at operation and following days. Subjects for analysis were 277 in 5'-DFUR and 281 in 5-FU groups. Median follow-up was 6.5 years. Although no differences in overall survival curves were detected, multivariate analysis showed that 5'-DFUR + PSK regimen was a significantly better prognostic factor in patients with Dukes B or C (risk ratio, 1.451; p=0.048); with tumor depth of pT3 or pT4 (risk ratio, 1.568; p=0.020). For patients with advanced colorectal cancer, 5'-DFUR + PSK therapy may possibly be more useful than 5-FU + PSK, but further study is required.

[Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with carmofur for colorectal cancer--a multi-institutional randomized controlled study].

The efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy with carmofur (HCFU) for colorectal cancer were evaluated in a randomized controlled study involving 63 institutes in the Kanto area. Patients aged 75 or younger with Dukes' B or C colorectal cancer were eligible if curative surgery was expected. In the end, 326 were eligible from 405 consecutive colorectal cancer patients. Patients in both the control (n = 162) and the new treatment group (n = 164) were given intravenous mitomycin C (MMC) 6 mg/m2 on day 0 and 7 after surgery and HCFU 300 mg/day orally from day 14 for a year. Patients in the new treatment group were also given oral HCFU for 14 days or more prior to surgery. All 326 patients were followed for 5 years or longer. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (75.4% and 71.6% for the control, and 71.8% and 71.5% for the study group, respectively). In the subset analysis, neither cancer site nor nodal status affected the differences in overall- and disease-free survival rates between the groups. The present findings show no additional efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy with HCFU in survival from advanced colorectal cancer. Further investigations in terms of patient selection, treatment regimen, combined use of radiotherapy, and other factors would be required to determine the significance of preoperative chemotherapy against advanced colorectal cancer.