RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: We have previously reported that alternate-day S-1 had comparable effects and milder adverse events than the respective consecutive-day regimen in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the anticancer effects of both regimens and underlying mechanisms in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines were treated with 5-FU given on an alternate-day or consecutive-day schedule. The relative inhibition (RI) of tumor growth was calculated. Cell cycle distributions and cyclin expression following 5-FU treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: The RI of both regimens was almost identical. The percentage of cells in S phase was significantly increased in the alternate-day group compared to the consecutive-day group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The cytotoxic effect of alternate-day was equivalent to that of consecutive-day. S-phase arrest was more prominently observed with the alternate-day regimen, which may help maintain 5-FU sensitivity in head and neck cancer cells.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Ciclo Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Fluorouracilo/farmacología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Esquema de Medicación , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Células Tumorales CultivadasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved organ preservation or overall survival (OS) of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC), but in clinical trials of conventional CRT, increasing CRT intensity has not been shown to improve OS. In the Adjuvant ChemoTherapy with S-1 after curative treatment in patients with Head and Neck Cancer (ACTS-HNC) phase III study, OS of curative locoregional treatments improved more with adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 (tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium) than with tegafur/uracil (UFT). ACTS HNC study showed the significant efficacy of S-1 after curative radiotherapy in sub-analysis. We explored the efficacy of S-1 after curative CRT in a subset of patients from the ACTS-HNC study. METHODS: Patients with stage III, IVA, or IVB LAHNSCC were enrolled in this study to evaluate the efficacy of S-1 compared with UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative CRT in the ACTS-HNC study. Patients received S-1 at 80-120 mg/day in two divided doses for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest, or UFT 300 or 400 mg/day in two or three divided doses daily, for 1 year. The endpoints were OS, disease-free survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and post-locoregional relapse survival. RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients (S-1, n = 87; UFT, n = 93) were included in this study. Clinical characteristics of the S-1 and UFT arms were similar. S-1 after CRT significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.93) and DMFS (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.97) compared with UFT. CONCLUSION: As adjuvant chemotherapy, S-1 demonstrated better efficacy for OS and DMFS than UFT in patients with LAHNSCC after curative CRT and may be considered a treatment option following curative CRT. For this study was not preplanned in the ACTS-HNC study, the results is hypothesis generating but not definitive.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uracilo/administración & dosificación , Uracilo/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: This study analyzed the safety and feasibility of alternate-day S-1, a mixture of tegafur, dehydroxypyrimidine and potassium oxonate, as adjuvant chemotherapy for head and neck cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who underwent primary treatment received alternate-day S-1 (80 mg/day for 1 year). The primary end-point was treatment completion rate. The secondary end-point was adverse events. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: One-year completion rate was 65.6%. Out of 26 patients, 19.0% had grade III adverse events. All adverse reactions were tolerable and reversible. Three-year OS and DFS were 74.8% and 57.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: S-1 therapy is an effective adjuvant treatment for head and neck cancer patients with relatively mild side-effects and does not adversely affect quality of life. A phase I/II study is warranted to investigate the appropriate dose for an alternate-day S-1 regimen.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Combinación de Medicamentos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
CONCLUSION: Pure tone auditory thresholds can change according to duration of interrupted tones in patients with mild to severe psychogenic hearing loss (PHL). OBJECTIVES: To examine how the duration of stimulus tones affects the hearing thresholds of patients with PHL. METHODS: Twelve patients with PHL (21 ears) were enrolled in this study. We initially measured their hearing thresholds using interrupted tones with a duration of 2 s and equal length of on-time and off-time, 225 ± 35 ms, respectively. After a 10 min interval, we measured their hearing thresholds using the same interrupted tones conditions lasting 5 s. The average threshold gains (2 s thresholds minus 5 s thresholds) were compared to those of 15 control subjects with normal hearing (25 ears), 15 patients with cochlear hearing loss (23 ears), and 4 patients with retrocochlear lesions (4 ears). Patients with profound PHL (4 patients, 6 ears) were analyzed separately. RESULTS: The average threshold gain of PHL patients (excluding profound PHL patients) at all frequencies was 18.3 dB, which was significantly larger than that of other groups: 0.3 dB (profound PHL patients), 3.8 dB (controls with normal hearing), 3.0 dB (patients with cochlear hearing loss), and 3.2 dB (patients with retrocochlear lesions).