Doublet or Triplet Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Nausea and Vomiting Induced by Trastuzumab Deruxtecan: an Open-Label, Randomized, and Multicenter Exploratory Phase 2 Study.

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan is classified as an anticancer agent that poses a moderate emetic risk in the international guidelines for antiemetic therapy. The guidelines recommend emesis prophylaxis using a two-drug combination therapy comprising a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA) and dexamethasone (DEX). However, the high incidence of nausea and vomiting associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan is problematic. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline version 1.2023 classified trastuzumab deruxtecan as having a high risk of emesis and changed its recommendation to a triplet regimen including a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA). However, the emetogenic potential of trastuzumab-deruxtecan and the optimal antiemetic prophylaxis are controversial. Hence, this exploratory phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment comprising 5-HT3RA and DEX with or without a NK1RA in preventing trastuzumab deruxtecan-induced nausea and vomiting. Methods: We conducted an open-label and randomized exploratory phase 2 study at 14 centers in Japan. Patients with breast cancer who were scheduled to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive granisetron and DEX (arm GD) or granisetron, DEX, and aprepitant (fosaprepitant; arm GDA). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis or no rescue therapy) during the overall phase (120 h after the start of trastuzumab deruxtecan). Results: Between September 2020 and March 2023, 40 patients were randomly assigned to the GD (n = 19) or GDA (n = 21) arm. In the GDA arm, one patient who did not complete the use of the rescue medication listed in the diary was excluded from the efficacy analysis, which included the use of rescue medication. The CR rates during the overall phase were 36.8% and 70.0% in the GD and GDA arms, respectively (odds ratio 0.1334; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0232-0.7672; P = 0.0190), with a difference of 33.2%. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity related to antiemetic therapy was observed. Conclusions: Patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan require triple therapy, including mandatory NK1RA administration.

Feasibility Study of Weekly Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) Followed by Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide Therapy as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have shown efficacy of nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel use as a neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer, dosage and schedules were varied or used in combination and the data are still limited for weekly regimens. We evaluated the feasibility of weekly nab-paclitaxel followed by FEC (5-FU [fluorouracil], epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) treatment feasibility as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with no previous chemotherapy were enrolled to receive nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 the first 3 of 4 weeks (3q4w) followed by FEC as neoadjuvant treatment. The trial was powered for analyses of feasibility. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients completed the treatment as per protocol, and the completion rate was 75.8% (95% confidence interval, 59.0-87.2; P = .44). The regimen completion group was younger than those with regimen incompletion (average 45.1 vs. 56.6 years). The pathological complete response (ypT0-is/N0) rate was 30.3% in 33 patients, which was higher in triple-negative patients (58.3%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 48.5%, although there was no febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was seen in 33.3%. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that weekly nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 3q4w followed by FEC as neoadjuvant regimen might be sufficient in efficacy, although with a relatively high severe adverse event occurrence rate.

Safety and efficacy of administering the maximal dose of candesartan in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The regular dose of an angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker (ARB) in renal transplant patients for hypertension is shown to be safe and effective; however, information on the appropriate dosing of ARBs in renal transplant patients is limited. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of the maximal dose of candesartan administered to renal transplant patients. METHODS: Sixty-nine recipients were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into three groups based on the basal dose of candesartan: patients not taking candesartan (Group A); patients taking a low to medium dose of candesartan (2-4 mg/day; Group B); and patients taking a high dose of candesartan (8 mg/day; Group C). During the course of the study, the dose of candesartan was gradually increased to a final dose of 12 mg/day. Physiological and biochemical parameters were measured before and after the 12-month study period. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of patients succeeded in continuing their administration of candesartan for 1 year and 75% tolerated the administration of the maximal dose of candesartan. Significant differences in proteinuria, albuminuria, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level among the groups were detected. In Group A, candesartan reduced systolic blood pressure, decreased the levels of proteinuria, albuminuria, eGFR, and hemoglobin and increased plasma potassium, creatinine level, and plasma renin activity. CONCLUSION: The gradual increase of an ARB to its maximal dose in renal transplant patients is safe when carefully monitored. We were able to demonstrate the impact of maximal renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade on both proteinuria and albuminuria, which indicates the need for future, long-term randomized prospective trials to further establish the impact of maximal RAS blockade on renal and cardiovascular protection in transplant patients.