Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Neuroradiol ; 46(1): 15-24, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29733918

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Arterial cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is discussed as the main pathomechanism for DCI. Due to positive effects of per os nimodipine, intraarterial nimodipine application is used in patients with DCI. Further, percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) is applied in focal high-grade spasm of intracranial arteries. However, clinical benefits of those techniques are unconfirmed in randomized trials so far, and complications might occur. We analyzed the occurrence of new infarcts in patients with severe CVS treated intra-arterially to assess benefits and risks of those techniques in a large single-center collective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All imaging and clinical data of 88 patients with CVS after SAH and 188 procedures of intraarterial nimodipine infusion and additional PTA in selected cases (18 patients, 20 PTA procedures) treated at our institution were reviewed. In the event of new infarcts after endovascular treatment of CVS, infarct patterns were analyzed to determine the most probable etiology. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of patients developed new cerebral infarction after intraarterial nimodipine and additional PTA in selected cases. Hereunder 47% were caused by persisting CVS. In 6% of patients, 3% of procedures respectively, new infarcts occurred due to complications of the intraarterial treatment including thromboembolism and arterial dissection. Of those, 3% of patients, 2% of procedures respectively, were assigned to thrombembolic complications of digital substraction angiography for intraarterial nimodipine. 17% of all patients treated with PTA (3/18=17%) showed infarction as a complication of PTA (15% of all PTA procedures). In 1% of patients, etiology of new infarction remained unclear. CONCLUSION: Ischemic complications occur in about 6% of patients treated intraarterially for CVS, 3% of procedures respectively. Further, to date a benefit for patients treated with this therapy could not be proven. Therefore, intraarterial treatment of CVS should be performed only in carefully selected cases.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Nimodipina/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica/epidemiología , Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto Cerebral/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Aneurisma Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Intracraneal/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nimodipina/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA