Role of Argininosuccinate Synthase 1 -Dependent L-Arginine Biosynthesis in the Protective Effect of Endothelial Sirtuin 3 Against Atherosclerosis.

Atherosclerosis is initiated with endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction and vascular inflammation under hyperlipidemia. Sirtuin 3 (SIRT3) is a mitochondrial deacetylase. However, the specific role of endothelial SIRT3 during atherosclerosis remains poorly understood. The present study aims to study the role and mechanism of SIRT3 in EC function during atherosclerosis. Wild-type Sirt3f/f mice and endothelium-selective SIRT3 knockout Sirt3f/f; Cdh5Cre/+ (Sirt3EC-KO) mice are injected with adeno-associated virus (AAV) to overexpress PCSK9 and fed with high-cholesterol diet (HCD) for 12 weeks to induce atherosclerosis. Sirt3EC-KO mice exhibit increased atherosclerotic plaque formation, along with elevated macrophage infiltration, vascular inflammation, and reduced circulating L-arginine levels. In human ECs, SIRT3 inhibition resulted in heightened vascular inflammation, reduced nitric oxide (NO) production, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), and diminished L-arginine levels. Silencing of SIRT3 results in hyperacetylation and deactivation of Argininosuccinate Synthase 1 (ASS1), a rate-limiting enzyme involved in L-arginine biosynthesis, and this effect is abolished in mutant ASS1. Furthermore, L-arginine supplementation attenuates enhanced plaque formation and vascular inflammation in Sirt3EC-KO mice. This study provides compelling evidence supporting the protective role of endothelial SIRT3 in atherosclerosis and also suggests a critical role of SIRT3-induced deacetylation of ASS1 by ECs for arginine synthesis.

Effects of combination treatment with metformin and berberine on hypoglycemic activity and gut microbiota modulation in db/db mice.

BACKGROUND: Gut microbiota alterations could influence the metabolism of administered drugs, leading to their altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Despite that metformin and berberine has individually demonstrated their impacts on hypoglycemic activities and gut microbiota alterations in diabetic mice, investigation regarding the impact of their combination treatment in diabetic treatment has never been conducted. PURPOSE: Our current study was proposed aiming to investigate the effect of combination use of metformin with berberine on hypoglycemic activity and identify the possible intestinal bacteria involved in their microbiota-medicated drug-drug interactions in db/db mice. STUDY DESIGN: Pharmacodynamics interactions between metformin and berberine were evaluated in six groups of db/db mice (db, M250, B250, B125, B250+M250, and B125+M250) with its wild type (WT) as control to receive 14 days treatment of vehicle, metformin at 250 mg/kg, berberine at 250/125 mg/kg, and metformin (250 mg/kg) 2 h after dosing berberine (250/125 mg/kg). METHODS: On day 13, insulin tolerance test (ITT) was conducted. On day 15, fasting serum samples were obtained for insulin concentration determination followed by intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (ipGTT), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) calculation, and feces collection for microbial 16S rRNA sequencing analyses. In addition, metformin steady state plasma concentrations on day 15 were measured by validated LC-MS/MS method. RESULTS: Combination treatment of metformin with berberine could further reduce in blood glucose in comparison to that of db/db diabetic control. Further microbial 16S rRNA sequencing analyses revealed that gut microbiota compositions were significantly changed with the abundance of Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia altered the most after metformin and berberine co-treatment compared to their monotherapy. In addition, steady state metformin concentrations in their combination treatment were significantly higher than that from metformin monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of metformin (250 mg/kg) with berberine (125 mg/kg) could not only further improve insulin sensitivity, but also demonstrate different alterations on gut microbial communities than that of their individual treatment in db/db mice.

A pilot study to compare meal-triggered gastric electrical stimulation and insulin treatment in Chinese obese type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal electromodulation therapy is a novel alternative for achieving diabetes control without traditional bariatric surgery. We compared the efficacy of a meal-initiated implantable gastric contractility modulation (GCM) device with that of insulin therapy in obese Chinese type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients, for whom oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) had failed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen obese (body mass index, 27.5-40.0 kg/m(2)) T2D patients with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of >7.5% on maximal doses of two or more OADs were offered either insulin therapy (n=8) or laparoscopic implantation of a GCM (n=8). We compared changes in body weight, waist circumference (WC), and HbA1c level 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The GCM and insulin groups had similar baseline body weight and HbA1c. At 12 months, body weight (-3.2±5.2 kg, P=0.043) and WC (-3.8±4.5 cm, P=0.021) fell in the GCM group but not in the insulin group (P<0.05 for between-group difference). At 6 and 12 months, the HbA1c level fell by 1.6±1.1% and 0.9±1.6% (P=0.011), compared with 0.6±0.3% and 0.6±0.3% (P=0.08) for the insulin group (P=0.15 for between-group difference). The mean 24-h systolic blood pressure (BP) fell by 4.5±1.0 mm Hg in the GCM group (P=0.017) but not in the insulin group. The GCM group required fewer antidiabetes medications (P<0.05) and BP-lowering drugs (P<0.05) than the insulin group. A subgroup analysis showed that patients with a triglyceride level of <1.7 mmol/L had a tendency toward a lower HbA1c level (P=0.090) compared with the controls. CONCLUSIONS: In obese T2D patients for whom OADs had failed, GCM implantation was a well-tolerated alternative to insulin therapy, with a low triglyceride level as a possible predictor for glycemic response.