Larvicidal Activity of Two Rutaceae Plant Essential Oils and Their Constituents Against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Multiple Formulations.

Aedes albopictus (Skuse) is a vector of several arboviruses, such as dengue, chikungunya, West Nile, and Zika viruses. At present, the use of synthetic insecticides is the main vector control strategy. However, the widespread and long-term use of insecticides has aroused several problems, including insecticide resistance, environmental pollution, and non-target species effects, thereby encouraging researchers to search for new alternatives derived from natural products. In recent decades, essential oils (EOs) as natural alternatives to control mosquitoes have received increasing attention. In the initial larvicidal activity screen, two Rutaceae plants (Citrus aurantium and Citrus paradisi) EOs were selected and evaluated for killing Ae. albopictus larvae. The LC50 values of C. aurantium and C. paradisi EOs against Ae. albopictus were 91.7 and 100.9 ppm, respectively. The main components of C. aurantium EO include diethyl o-phthalate (37.32%), limonene (10.04%), and methyl dihydrojasmonate (6.48%). The main components of C. paradisi EO include limonene (60.51%), diethyl o-phthalate (11.75%), linalool (7.90%), and styralyl acetate (6.28%). Among these main components of the two EOs, limonene showed potent larvicidal activity, with the LC50 value of 39.7 ppm. The nanoemulsions of limonene were prepared and characterized. The duration of larvicidal activity was greater in the limonene nanoemulsions than when limonene was applied in solvent. This study demonstrates that EOs of plants in family Rutaceae are a potential resource to develop new larvicides, and nanoemulsification is an effective method for improving the physicochemical properties and efficacy of natural products as larvicides.

Comparison of periodontal ligament anesthesia and submucosal infiltration anesthesia in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (C-CLADS) and submucosal infiltration anesthesia using a manually operated syringe in terms of the injection pain, anesthetic effect, anesthetic dose, and complications in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Fifty healthy volunteers, aged 18 to 56 years, were recruited from September 2012 to May 2013 in the Department of Stomatology of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. A randomized self-controlled trial was conducted by applying a periodontal ligament anesthesia on one side and conventional manual submucosal infiltration anesthesia to the other (control) side. The differences in the onset time of anesthesia, drug dosage, anesthetic effect, and the degree of injection pain were compared. The complications associated with the two anesthesia methods were also recorded. RESULTS: When using C-CLADS to perform a periodontal ligament anesthesia, the drug dosage and the severity of injection pain were significantly less than those of conventional manual infiltration anesthesia [drug dosage: (0.34±0.09)ml vs.(0.55±0.13)ml, P<0.01; VRS: 0.42±0.73 vs. 1.38±0.92, P<0.01; VAS: 1.34±1.21 vs. 3.10±1.70, P<0.01]. The anesthesia success rate was approximately 90.0%, showing no significant difference relative to conventional submucosal infiltration anesthesia. Approximately 24% of the volunteers experienced postoperative pain after periodontal ligament anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional submucosal infiltration anesthesia using manual syringes, periodontal ligament anesthesia performed using C-CLADS can reduce the injection pain and drug dosage while achieving a satisfactory anesthetic effect; however, a considerable proportion of cases may experience postoperative pain.