Current status of biomarker and targeted nanoparticle development: The precision oncology approach for pancreatic cancer therapy.

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality. The majority of pancreatic cancer patients are diagnosed at the advanced stage with unresectable and drug resistant tumors. The new treatments with the combination of chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have shown modest effects on therapeutic efficacy and survival of the patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic approaches targeting highly heterogeneous pancreatic cancer cells and tumor microenvironments. Recent advances in biomarker targeted cancer therapy and image-guided drug delivery and monitoring treatment response using multifunctional nanoparticles, also referred to as theranostic nanoparticles, offer a new opportunity of effective detection and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Increasing evidence from preclinical studies has shown the potential of applications of theranostic nanoparticles for designing precision oncology approaches for pancreatic cancer therapy. In this review, we provide an update on the current understanding and strategies for the development of targeted therapy for pancreatic cancer using nanoparticle drug carriers. We address issues concerning drug delivery barriers in stroma rich pancreatic cancer and the potential approaches to improve drug delivery efficiency, therapeutic responses and tumor imaging. Research results presented in this review suggest the development of an integrated therapy protocol through image-guided and targeted drug delivery and therapeutic effect monitoring as a promising precision oncology strategy for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Post-hepatectomy hyperbilirubinemia: The point of no return.

BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy hyperbilirubinemia is associated with liver insufficiency and failure. The highest survivable peak total bilirubin (ptbili) is not defined. This study aimed to identify the postop ptbili beyond which survival is improbable or impossible. METHODS: An institutional database of major hepatectomies (≥3 segments, no biliary resections), 2000-2012 was reviewed. Data were analyzed to find ptbili in the first 45 postop days. Factors associated with 90-day mortality (90 DM) and those predictive of ptbili were determined. RESULTS: 603 pts were analyzed with 90DM of 4.5%. 90 DM for a ptbili ≥ 18 (n = 15) was 86.6%, but only 2.5% for a ptbili < 18. All 6 pts with a ptbili ≥ 30 died. On multivariate analysis, postop ptbili ≥ 18 (HR34.95, CI 3.8-324; p = 0.002) and cirrhosis (HR6.4, CI 1.2-33.2; p = 0.027) were associated with 90DM. Factors associated with a ptbili ≥ 18 were age >65 (HR14.24, CI 2.9-70.5; p = 0.001), preop chemotherapy (HR4.77, CI 1.3-18.2; p = 0.02) and postop FFP (HR12.5, CI 2.6-56.2; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Postop ptbili ≥ 18 after major hepatectomy has an 86.6% risk of 90DM; there are no survivors for tbili ≥ 30. These values may guide postop counseling for prognosis. Future studies may evaluate tbili ≥ 18 as an indication for hepatic replacement therapy.

A Phase 1 Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer After Modified FOLFIRINOX (NCT01446458).

PURPOSE: A challenge in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) management is the high rate of positive posterior margins (PM). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows for higher radiation delivery dose with conformity. This study evaluated the maximal tolerated dose with a dose escalation plan level up to 45 Gy using SBRT in BRPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-institution, 3 + 3 phase 1 clinical trial design was used to evaluate 4 dose levels of SBRT delivered in 3 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV) with a simultaneous in-field boost (SIB) to the PM. Dose level (DL) 1 was 30 Gy to the PTV, and for dose levels 2 through 4 (DL2-DL4) the dose was 36 Gy. The SIB dose to the PM was 6, 6, 7.5, and 9 Gy for DL-1, DL-2, DL-3, and DL-4, respectively. All patients received 4 treatments of modified FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) before SBRT. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with a median age of 64 years were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 18 months. The locations of the cancer were head (n=12) and uncinate/neck (n=1). One patient did not undergo SBRT. There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Five patients did not undergo resection because of disease progression (1 local, 4 distant); 8 had R0 resection in the PM, and 5 of 8 had vessel reconstruction. Two patients had disease downstaged to T1 and T2 from T3 disease. Four patients are still alive, and 3 are disease free. The median overall survival for resected patients was not reached (9.3: not reached). CONCLUSION: The SBRT dose of 36 Gy with a 9-Gy SIB to the PM (total 45 Gy) delivered in 3 fractions is safe and well tolerated. The dose-limiting toxicity for a 45-Gy dose was not reached, and further dose escalations are needed in future trials.

Adherence to Guidelines for Adjuvant Imatinib Therapy for GIST: A Multi-institutional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Adjuvant imatinib therapy improves recurrence-free and overall survival following surgery for patients with high-risk GIST; however, the factors associated with use of adjuvant imatinib therapy are unclear, and adherence to adjuvant imatinib has not been investigated. We sought to determine the clinicopathologic predictors of therapy with adjuvant imatinib following surgical resection for GIST and to determine the utilization of adjuvant imatinib in patients who underwent surgical resection of primary GIST in 2009 or later as recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer network (NCCN) guidelines. METHODS: A multi-institutional cohort including 171 patients who underwent surgery for primary GIST at seven high-volume cancer centers in the USA and Canada between January 2009-December 2012 was used in this study. Receipt of adjuvant imatinib therapy was ascertained, and factors associated with imatinib therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: Following surgery for primary GIST, tumor size (<5.0 cm: ref; 5.0-9.9 cm: odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.74-7.55; >10.0 cm: OR 9.15, 95 % CI 2.28-36.75; p = 0.007), mitotic rate (≤5/50 mitoses per 50 high powered field [HPF]: ref; 6-10/50 HPF: OR 24.91, 95 % CI 3.64-170.35; >10/50 HPF: OR 5.80, 95 % CI 3.64-170.35; p < 0.001), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 9.52; 95 % CI 2.51-36.14; p = 0.001) were associated with receipt of adjuvant imatinib therapy. Overall, 75 % of patients received appropriate treatment, 23 % of patients were undertreated, and 2 % of patients were overtreated as compared to NCCN guidelines. Adjuvant imatinib therapy was administered in only 53 % of patients for which the NCCN guidelines recommended adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: The clinicopathologic factors associated with use of adjuvant imatinib therapy in patients following resection of primary GIST are consistent with established risk factors for recurrence. Adjuvant imatinib therapy remains underutilized in patients with intermediate and high-risk GIST and in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy. Barriers to adjuvant imatinib therapy in this group of patients needs to be further explored.

Hypophosphataemia after major hepatectomy and the risk of post-operative hepatic insufficiency and mortality: an analysis of 719 patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypophosphataemia after a hepatectomy suggests hepatic regeneration. It was hypothesized that the absence of hypophosphataemia is associated with post-operative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) and complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent a major hepatectomy from 2000-2012 at a single institution were identified. Post-operative serum phosphorus levels were assessed. Primary outcomes were PHI (peak bilirubin >7 mg/dl), major complications, and 30- and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Seven hundred and nineteen out of 749 patients had post-operative phosphorus levels available. PHI and major complications occurred in 63 (8.8%) and 169 (23.5%) patients, respectively. Thirty- and 90-day mortality were 4.0% and 5.4%, respectively. The median phosphorus level on post-operative-day (POD) 2 was 2.2 mg/dl; 231 patients (32.1%) had phosphorus >2.4 on POD2. Patients with POD2 phosphorus >2.4 had a significantly higher incidence of PHI, major complications and mortality. On multivariate analysis, POD2 phosphorus >2.4 remained a significant risk factor for PHI [(hazard ratio HR):1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.02-3.17; P = 0.048], major complications (HR:1.57; 95%CI:1.02-2.47; P = 0.049), 30-day mortality (HR:2.70; 95%CI:1.08-6.76; P = 0.034) and 90-day mortality (HR:2.51; 95%CI:1.03-6.15; P = 0.044). Similarly, patients whose phosphorus level reached nadir after POD3 had higher PHI, major complications and mortality. CONCLUSION: Elevated POD2 phosphorus levels >2.4 mg/dl and a delayed nadir in phosphorus beyond POD3 are associated with increased post-operative hepatic insufficiency, major complications and early mortality. Failure to develop hypophosphataemia within 72 h after a major hepatectomy may reflect insufficient liver remnant regeneration.

Vein involvement during pancreaticoduodenectomy: is there a need for redefinition of "borderline resectable disease"?

INTRODUCTION: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma to increase the likelihood of achieving R0 resection. A consensus has not been reached on the degree of venous involvement that constitutes borderline resectability. This study compares the outcome of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without vein resection without neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: A multi-institutional database of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy was reviewed. Patients who required vein resection due to gross vein involvement by tumor were compared to those without evidence of vein involvement. RESULTS: Of 492 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, 70 (14 %) had vein resection and 422 (86 %) did not. There was no difference in R0 resection (66 vs. 75 %, p = NS). On multivariate analysis, vein involvement was not predictive of disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION: This is the largest modern series examining patients with or without isolated vein involvement by pancreas cancer, none of whom received neoadjuvant therapy. Oncological outcome was not different between the two groups. These data suggest that up-front surgical resection is an appropriate option and call into question the inclusion of isolated vein involvement in the definition of "borderline resectable disease."

Differential expression of ERCC1 in pancreas adenocarcinoma: high tumor expression is associated with earlier recurrence and shortened survival after resection.

BACKGROUND: Increased tumor expression of excision repair cross-complementing gene-1 (ERCC1) is associated with decreased survival in patients with various cancers. Its effect in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) is not defined. METHODS: Ninety-five patients were selected from a prospective database of all patients (n = 220) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PAC between January 2000 and October 2008. Tumor was isolated to perform immunohistochemistry for ERCC1 expression and was graded by a single pathologist. Main outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median age was 63 years; 50 patients (53%) were male and 73 (77%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 25 months. Median RFS and OS was 9 and 16 months. Median tumor size was 3 cm; 26% had a positive resection margin, 34% had poorly differentiated tumors, 61% had positive lymph nodes, 88% had perineural invasion, and 45% had lymphovascular invasion. Tumors exhibited differential ERCC1 expression in terms of intensity staining [none-weak: 61%; moderate-strong: 39%], percentage staining [0: 39%; 1-10: 29%; 11-50: 20%; 51-100: 12%], and overall expression [low: 84%; high: 16%]. High ERCC1 expression was associated with reduced RFS (6 vs. 10 months; P = 0.03) and decreased OS (9 vs. 18 months; P = 0.019). After accounting for adverse tumor factors, high ERCC1 expression persisted as a negative prognostic factor on multivariate Cox regression for both RFS and OS [hazards ratio (HR), 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-3.9; P = 0.02; HR, 3; 95% CI, 1.6-6; P = 0.001, respectively]. A subset analysis of only those 73 patients who received adjuvant therapy revealed the same negative effect of high ERCC1 expression on RFS (4 vs. 15 months; P = 0.001) and OS (9 vs. 20 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas cancer exhibits differential expression of ERCC1. High ERCC1 expression is associated with both reduced RFS and OS after resection. ERCC1 expression levels may help to predict patient outcome with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Comparison of central and extended left pancreatectomy for lesions of the pancreatic neck.

BACKGROUND: Central pancreatectomy (CP) is a parenchyma-sparing alternative to extended left pancreatectomy (ELP) for tumors of the pancreatic neck. We compared short- and long-term outcomes for the two approaches. METHODS: Patients who underwent CP or ELP from 2000-2007 for neoplasms of the neck were identified. Charts were reviewed for patient, treatment, and outcome data. Long-term and quality-of-life (QoL) data were gathered through Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved telephone interviews and questionnaires European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30, and QLQ-PAN26. RESULTS: 31 patients were identified; 13 underwent CP and 18 underwent ELP. Median follow-up was 29 months (range 5-90). Groups did not differ in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, or preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM). CP patients had less gland resected (5.7 +/- 2.1 cm versus 10.8 +/- 2.8 cm) and lower postoperative mean blood glucose levels (120 +/- 15 mg/dl versus 136 +/- 24 mg/dl). CP patients experienced more complications (92% versus 39%), but no significant difference in major complications (38%, CP versus 17%, ELP; P = 0.17) or hospital stay (9 +/- 3 days, CP versus 7.5 +/- 4 days, ELP). There was one perioperative death in the CP group, unrelated to surgical technique. Questionnaire analysis showed no differences in functional or symptom scales. New-onset exocrine insufficiency was not significantly different between the groups (10%, CP versus 27%, ELP; P = 0.62), but the ELP group had a higher rate of new-onset DM (57% versus 11%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: CP is associated with more complications than ELP, but no difference in long-term QoL. Due to the lower incidence of postoperative DM, CP can be recommended for healthy patients with indolent tumors of the pancreatic neck.

Neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation: a phase I trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic/gastrointestinal malignancies.

The authors developed a strategy that includes a novel approach of induction full-dose chemotherapy followed by traditional chemoradiation as a neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Here they report the results of a phase I/II trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and 5-FU for patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.