RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systemic agents are used in melanoma for adjuvant therapy and to treat metastatic disease. Currently, interferon-α is the only agent approved for adjuvant therapy. Six drugs are FDA approved for metastatic disease: dacarbazine, interleukin-2 (IL-2), vemurafenib, ipilimumab, dabrafenib, and trametinib. Vemurafenib and ipilimumab were approved in 2011, whereas dabrafenib and trametinib were approved in 2013. OBJECTIVE: This review will update the practicing dermatologist on the differences in efficacy, adverse events, and cost of systemic therapies available for the treatment of melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article is a review of the current literature on systemic therapies for advanced melanoma. Key search words included "advanced melanoma," "systemic therapy," and "adjuvant therapy" with particular focus on the past 20 years. RESULTS: Before 2011, dacarbazine and IL-2 were the only FDA approved therapies for metastatic melanoma, and IFN-α is the only approved agent for adjuvant therapy. The new agents vemurafenib, ipilimumab, dabrafenib, and trametinib are the first to have improved overall survival in Phase III studies in comparison with other systemic therapies. CONCLUSION: Despite new developments, there remains a significant need for better therapies with improved long-term efficacy and decreased toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/economía , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Interferón-alfa/efectos adversos , Interleucina-2/efectos adversos , Ipilimumab , Melanoma/secundario , Oximas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Platino/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Temozolomida , VemurafenibRESUMEN
Agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling have been advocated as frontline therapy for advanced renal cancer. The role of interleukin 2 (IL-2) therapy after resistance to VEGF-targeted therapy remains unexplored. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the tolerability and efficacy of IL-2 therapy in patients who had previously received VEGF-targeted therapy. Twenty-three consecutive patients who received salvage IL-2 therapy were analyzed. Fifteen patients had received prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (sorafenib or sunitinib), whereas 8 patients had received bevacizumab alone. Six of 23 patients did not receive week 2 of cycle 1 of treatment. All 6 of these patients had received prior TKIs. The incidence of severe cardiac toxicities, including 1 sudden cardiac death, in patients receiving prior TKI was 40% (95% confidence interval, 16.3-67.7%), significantly higher than what is expected from historical experience. Only 1 of 23 patients proceeded to receive a second cycle of IL-2. No patients achieved a partial or complete response to therapy. This retrospective analysis highlights unexpected and severe cardiac toxicities in patients receiving IL-2 after VEGF-targeted TKI therapy. The assumption that IL-2 therapy can be safely administered after TKI therapy may not be valid. Further examination of the safety of this sequential approach is necessary and more cautious patient selection seems warranted.