Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 30(8): 2639-2653, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33666686

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic overview was to identify, synthesise and critically appraise findings of meta-analyses on robot-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that robotic assistance would reduce complications and revision rates, yield better clinical scores, and improve component positioning and alignment. METHODS: Two researchers independently conducted a literature search using Embase®, MEDLINE®, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine™ and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 2 November 2020 for meta-analyses (Level I-IV) on robotic assistance in UKA and/or TKA. Outcomes were tabulated and reported as weighted mean difference (WMD), risk ratio (RR) or weighted odds ratio (WOR), and were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of ten meta-analyses were identified; four on robot-assisted UKA (n, 1880 robot-assisted vs. 2352 conventional UKA; follow-up, 0 to 60 months), seven on robot-assisted TKA (n, 4567 robot-assisted vs. 5966 conventional TKA; follow-up, 0 to 132 months). Of the meta-analyses on UKA, one found that robotic assistance reduced complication rates (relative risk (RR), 0.62), one found that it improved clinical scores (weighted mean difference (WMD), 19.67), three found that it extended operation times (WMD, 15.7 to 17.1 min), and three found that it improved component positioning and alignment (WMD, - 1.30 to - 3.02 degrees). Of the meta-analyses on TKA, two found that robotic assistance improved clinical scores (WMD, 1.62-1.71), two found that that it extended surgery times (WMD, 21.5-24.26 min), and five found that it improved component positioning and alignment (WMD, - 0.50 to - 10.07 degrees). None of the meta-analyses reported differences in survivorship between robot-assisted versus conventional knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted knee arthroplasty enabled more accurate component positioning and placement within target zones, but extended operation time considerably. Although robotic assistance improved component positioning, its benefits regarding clinical scores, patient satisfaction and implant survivorship remains to be confirmed. Finally, this overview revealed that six of the ten meta-analyses were of 'critically low quality', calling for caution when interpreting results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/cirugía , Reoperación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 29(3): 694-709, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33404817

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To elaborate recommendations for sports participation following TKA among the members of the European Knee Associates (EKA). METHODS: A prospective online survey was conducted among the members of the European Knee Associates (EKA). The European Knee Associates (EKA) are a section of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA). The survey investigated recommendations for 47 sports disciplines. Possible answers were: allowed, allowed if experienced, not allowed, no opinion. The survey was conducted separately for 4 specific time frames: within 6 weeks after TKA; 6-12 weeks after TKA; 3-6 months after TKA; and more than 6 months after TKA. Consensus among the respondents was then analyzed. RESULTS: EKA members (N = 120) participated in the survey. A high level of consensus was reached for a recommendation to allow 5 different sports in the first 6 weeks after TKA, 7 sports 6-12 weeks after surgery, 14 sports 3-6 months after TKA, and 21 out of 47 activities 6 months after surgery. In the first 6 weeks after TKA walking, stair climbing, swimming, aqua fitness, and static cycling were recommended. Six to twelve weeks after TKA, cycling on level ground and yoga were recommended in addition to the aforementioned activities. Further sports activities recommended beyond 12 weeks after TKA were: tennis doubles, golf, fitness/weight lifting, aerobics, hiking, Nordic walking and sailing. The sport for which the recommendation was "not allowed" following TKA was squash. CONCLUSION: The number of sports recommended by EKA surgeons increases stepwise over the postoperative time frames. The findings are regarded as clinically relevant as they may serve as a basis for answering patient questions on timing and giving recommendations for the resumption of sports activities following standard primary TKA and should be individualized by surgeons for their patients' expectations and goals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/rehabilitación , Ejercicio Físico , Volver al Deporte , Deportes , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Ciclismo , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Golf , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Natación , Tenis , Caminata , Yoga
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA