[Perioperative anticoagulation with NOAC using the example of rivaroxaban]. / Perioperative Antikoagulation mit NOAK am Beispiel Rivaroxaban.

BACKGROUND: Recent findings require an update of earlier recommendations on the perioperative management of non Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). METHOD: The present position paper summarises the outcomes of an expert panel discussion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on the pharmacokinetic profile of rivaroxaban, a preoperative interruption of 24-72 hours is recommended depending on the patient's renal function, as well as individual and surgery-related bleeding risks. Similar NOAC-free intervals are recommended for patients with epidural catheters. Elective surgery should be delayed accordingly. A low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) "bridging" (in fact "switching") should be avoided because of an increased bleeding risk. Six to 8 hours after the intervention rivaroxaban can be re-initiated or, in case of more extensive interventions or an increased bleeding risk, after 24-72 hours; if necessary this interval could by bridged with LMWH, e. g. if the thromboembolic risk is considered high. In case of emergency surgery with a rivaroxaban pause of less than 9 hours, one should be prepared for a bleeding management including the use of prothrombin concentrate (PCC). Coagulation tests have no value for predicting perioperative bleeding, in contrast to a standardised bleeding history. As an overall estimate, the PT (Quick) can be determined with a suitable reagent. Currently, rivaroxaban-specific measurements of anti Xa levels are available at few specialised centres only. Moderate to severe haemorrhages can usually be managed by temporary interruption of rivaroxaban in conjunction with local and general haemostatic measures. Life-threatening bleeding events require a specific haemostasis management including the administration of PCC; these events are rare and usually have a favourable prognosis, except for intracranial haemorrhages.

Blood rheology at term in normal pregnancy and in patients with adverse outcome events.

Plasma volume expansion of more than 1.5 l and sustainable activation of the hemostatic system that results in a steady rise of the fibrinogen/fibrin turnover are contemporary physiological events during normal pregnancy. In contrast, adverse outcome of pregnancy i.e. pre-eclampsia commonly coincide with hemo concentration and over activation of blood coagulation both of which alter blood rheology. On the basis of 4,985 consecutively recorded singleton pregnancies values range of blood rheological parameters in women with normal and complicated outcome of pregnancy at the time of their delivery were compared. Plasma viscosity (pv) was determined using KSPV 1 Fresenius and RBC aggregation (stasis: E0 and low shear: E1) using MA1-Aggregometer; Myrenne. Seventy-nine point four percent (n=3,959) had normal pregnancy outcome and 1,026 with adverse outcome of pregnancy had pre-eclampsia (8.4%; n=423), had newborn with a birth-weight < 2,500 g (9.5%; n=473), had early-birth before week 37 (9.3%; n=464), and/or were diagnosed with intra uterine growth retardation (IUGR) (5.0%; n=250). In women with normal pregnancy outcome mean (+/-SD) of pv was 1.31+/-0.09 mPa s, of E0 was 21.6+/-5.3, and of E1 was 38.4+/-7.9 while in women with adverse outcome means for rheological parameters were statistically significantly different i.e. pv: 1.32+/-0.08 mPa s; p=0.006, E0: 22.1+/-5.5; p=0.002 and E1: 39.5+/-8.5; p=0.0006. Subgroup analysis revealed statistical significant lower pv in women who either had pre term delivery or a low birth-weight child (p<0.005) as compared to women who had normal pregnancy outcome while patients with pre-eclampsia had markedly higher low shear and stasis RBC aggregation (p<0.0001). None of the rheological results at term were correlated with either maternal age (r<0.04), BMI (r<0.09), maternal weight gain until delivery (r<0.04), or fetal outcome such as APGAR-score (r<0.09) art. pH in the umbilical cord (-0.05

Use of the platelet reactivity index by Grotemeyer, platelet function analyzer, and retention test Homburg to monitor therapy with antiplatelet drugs.

In 1974, Wu and Hoak described a method for determining circulating platelet aggregates. This method was modified by Grotemeyer in 1983. The platelet reactivity index (PR) is based on the ratio of platelet aggregates in blood samples obtained in different buffer solutions. Platelet aggregates are resolved when blood is sampled in EDTA-buffer, but remain fixed when EDTA-formalin-buffer is used. Generally, the PR is preferred, because in vitro manipulations of platelets are not necessary, and the results are calculated. PR values above 1.05 are suspicious for elevated platelet aggregation. PR values above 1.2 indicate pathological changes in platelet aggregation. The PR is inexpensive (4.0 euro dollars) and rapid to perform. PR values were used successfully to identify nonresponders to secondary prophylaxis with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), that is, patients suffering from stroke (33%) and patients after cardiac ischemia (18%). Furthermore, elevated PR values correlated significantly with the incidence of arterial thromboembolic complications. The PR correlated well in our prospective study with values received from the retention test Homburg (RT-H) and the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100). The data indicate that the values of the PR seem to be highly predictive for the evaluation of the ASA therapy. However, the PR is not feasible for the determination of the ASA overdosage.