Optimization of Fluconazole Dosing for the Prevention and Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis Based on the Pharmacokinetics of Fluconazole in Critically Ill Patients.

The efficacy of fluconazole is related to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) over the MIC of the microorganism. Physiological changes in critically ill patients may affect the exposure of fluconazole, and therefore dosing adjustments might be needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate variability in fluconazole drug concentration in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to develop a pharmacokinetic model to support personalized fluconazole dosing. A prospective observational pharmacokinetic study was performed in critically ill patients receiving fluconazole either as prophylaxis or as treatment. The association between fluconazole exposure and patient variables was studied. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed with a nonparametric adaptive grid (NPAG) algorithm using R package Pmetrics. Data from 33 patients were available for pharmacokinetic analysis. Patients on dialysis and solid organ transplant patients had a significantly lower exposure to fluconazole. The population was best described with a one-compartment model, where the mean volume of distribution was 51.52 liters (standard deviation [SD], 19.81) and the mean clearance was 0.767 liters/h (SD, 0.46). Creatinine clearance was tested as a potential covariate in the model, but was not included in the final population model. A significant positive correlation was found between the fluconazole exposure (AUC) and the trough concentration (Cmin). Substantial variability in fluconazole plasma concentrations in critically ill adults was observed, where the majority of patients were underexposed. Fluconazole Cmin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided dosing can be used to optimize therapy in critically ill patients. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02491151.).

The Role of Fluoroquinolones in the Treatment of Tuberculosis in 2019.

The inability to use powerful antituberculosis drugs in an increasing number of patients seems to be the biggest threat towards global tuberculosis (TB) elimination. Simplified, shorter and preferably less toxic drug regimens are being investigated for pulmonary TB to counteract emergence of drug resistance. Intensified regimens with high-dose anti-TB drugs during the first weeks of treatment are being investigated for TB meningitis to increase the survival rate among these patients. Moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin are seen as core agents in case of resistance or intolerance against first-line anti-TB drugs. However, based on their pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), these drugs are also promising for TB meningitis and might perhaps have the potential to shorten pulmonary TB treatment if dosing could be optimized. We prepared a comprehensive summary of clinical trials investigating the outcome of TB regimens based on moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin in recent years. In the majority of clinical trials, treatment success was not in favour of these drugs compared to standard regimens. By discussing these results, we propose that incorporation of extended PK/PD analysis into the armamentarium of drug-development tools is needed to clarify the role of moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin for TB, using the right dose. In addition, to prevent failure of treatment or emergence of drug-resistance, PK and PD variability advocates for concentration-guided dosing in patients at risk for too low a drug-exposure.

Pharmacokinetics of 2,000 Milligram Ertapenem in Tuberculosis Patients.

Ertapenem is a carbapenem antibiotic with activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Dose simulations in a hollow-fiber infection model showed that 2,000 mg once daily is an appropriate dose to be tested in clinical studies. Before using this dose in a phase II study, the aim of this prospective pharmacokinetic study was to confirm the pharmacokinetics of 2,000 mg once daily in tuberculosis (TB) patients. Twelve TB patients received a single intravenous dose of 2,000 mg ertapenem as a 30-min infusion. Blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postadministration. Drug concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. A large interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of ertapenem was observed. The median (interquartile range) area under the plasma concentration-time curve to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 2,032 (1,751 to 2,346) mg · h/liter, the intercompartmental clearance (CL12) was 1.941 (0.979 to 2.817) liters/h, and the volume of distribution in the central compartment (V1) was 1.514 (1.064 to 2.210) liters. A more than dose-proportional increase in AUC was observed compared to results reported for 1,000 mg ertapenem in multidrug-resistant TB patients. Based on a MIC of 1.0 mg/liter, 11 out of 12 patients would have reached the target value of unbound drug exceeding the MIC over 40% of the time (f40% T>MIC). In conclusion, this study shows that 2,000 mg ertapenem once daily in TB patients reached the expected f40% T>MIC for most of the patients, and exploration in a phase 2 study can be advocated.

Reduced Chance of Hearing Loss Associated with Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Aminoglycosides in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Hearing loss and nephrotoxicity are associated with prolonged treatment duration and higher dosage of amikacin and kanamycin. In our tuberculosis center, we used therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) targeting preset pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) surrogate endpoints in an attempt to maintain efficacy while preventing (oto)toxicity. To evaluate this strategy, we retrospectively evaluated medical charts of tuberculosis (TB) patients treated with amikacin or kanamycin in the period from 2000 to 2012. Patients with culture-confirmed multiresistant or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB) receiving amikacin or kanamycin as part of their TB treatment for at least 3 days were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Clinical data, including maximum concentration (Cmax), Cmin, and audiometry data, were extracted from the patients' medical charts. A total of 80 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean weighted Cmax/MIC ratios obtained from 57 patients were 31.2 for amikacin and 12.3 for kanamycin. The extent of hearing loss was limited and correlated with the cumulative drug dose per kg of body weight during daily administration. At follow-up, 35 (67.3%) of all patients had successful outcome; there were no relapses. At a median dose of 6.5 mg/kg, a correlation was found between the dose per kg of body weight during daily dosing and the extent of hearing loss in dB at 8,000 Hz. These findings suggest that the efficacy at this lower dosage is maintained with limited toxicity. A randomized controlled trial should provide final proof of the safety and efficacy of TDM-guided use of aminoglycosides in MDR-TB treatment.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Sulfamethoxazole at 800 Milligrams Once Daily in the Treatment of Tuberculosis.

For treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), there is a scarcity of antituberculosis drugs. Co-trimoxazole is one of the available drug candidates, and it is already frequently coprescribed for TB-HIV-coinfected patients. However, only limited data are available on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of co-trimoxazole in TB patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the PK parameters and in vitro PD data on the effective part of co-trimoxazole: sulfamethoxazole. In a prospective PK study in patients infected with drug-susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis (drug-susceptible TB patients) (age, >18), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT) was administered orally at a dose of 960 mg once daily. One-compartment population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using MW\Pharm 3.81 (Mediware, Groningen, The Netherlands). The area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound fraction of a drug (ƒAUC)/MIC ratio and the period in which the free concentration exceeded the MIC (fT > MIC) were calculated. Twelve patients received 960 mg co-trimoxazole in addition to first-line drugs. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the population model were as follows (geometric mean ± standard deviation [SD]): metabolic clearance (CLm), 1.57 ± 3.71 liters/h; volume of distribution (V), 0.30 ± 0.05 liters · kg lean body mass(-1); drug clearance/creatinine clearance ratio (fr), 0.02 ± 0.13; gamma distribution rate constant (ktr_po), 2.18 ± 1.14; gamma distribution shape factor (n_po), 2.15 ± 0.39. The free fraction of sulfamethoxazole was 0.3, but ranged between 0.2 and 0.4. The median value of the MICs was 9.5 mg/liter (interquartile range [IQR], 4.75 to 9.5), and that of theƒAUC/MIC ratio was 14.3 (IQR, 13.0 to 17.5). The percentage of ƒT > MIC ranged between 43 and 100% of the dosing interval. The PK and PD data from this study are useful to explore a future dosing regimen of co-trimoxazole for MDR-TB treatment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01832987.).

Evaluation of moxifloxacin for the treatment of tuberculosis: 3 years of experience.

Moxifloxacin (MFX) is a powerful second-line anti-tuberculosis (TB) agent, but the optimal dose has not yet been established and long-term safety data are scarce. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of TB patients treated at the Tuberculosis Centre Beatrixoord, University Medical Centre Groningen (Haren, the Netherlands) receiving MFX 400 mg once daily as part of their TB treatment between January 1 2006 and January 1 2009. Safety data and drug-drug interactions were evaluated. Efficacy was predicted based on the area under the concentration-time curve up to 24 h post-dosage (AUC(0-24h))/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio. 89 patients were treated with a median dose of 6.9 mg · kg(-1) MFX once daily for a median period of 74 days. Discontinuation of therapy occurred in only three patients due to gastrointestinal side-effects and hypersensitivity. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed an AUC(0-24h)/MIC ratio <100 in eight out of 16 patients. A large variation in protein binding affected the unbound AUC(0-24h) considerably. These data show that MFX treatment was well tolerated in 89 patients receiving a dose of 400 mg once daily for a prolonged period. Considering the variability in (un)bound AUC(0-24h)/MIC ratio, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in selected patients (i.e. rifampicin co-medication; MIC ≥ 0.25 mg · L(-1)) to assess optimal therapy.

A novel dissolution method relevant to intestinal release behaviour and its application in the evaluation of modified release mesalazine products.

Mesalazine (5-ASA) is a compound being used in the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Considering the fact that 5-ASA is locally active and that the location of inflammation in IBD may vary, it is recognized that the release profile of 5-ASA drugs is the dominant factor for adequate local bioavailability. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that systemic absorption of 5-ASA (mainly in the upper intestinal segments) increases the risk of side effects. These facts relate to the conclusion that a method determining the dissolution profile under biorelevant conditions is a valuable tool for evaluation and comparison of 5-ASA-products. We tested several commercially available products (Salofalk tablets, Salofalk granules, Asacol tablets, Pentasa tablets and granules) in a gastro-intestinal simulation system (GISS). The GISS is based on the pharmacopeial dissolution test. The release profiles of all products are in agreement with their technological concepts. The percentage of the dose released in the simulated colon is small in all products. The GISS is a robust system able to discriminate between products which apply different modified-release technologies. Colon-selectivity of modified-release 5-ASA products might further be improved. The commercially available 5-ASA containing oral dosage forms exhibit different release profiles, which suggests that the optimal product may differ per patient.