Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurology ; 84(7): 710-9, 2015 Feb 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25609769

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to identify static and dynamic O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET ((18)FET-PET)-derived imaging biomarkers in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: Seventy-nine patients with newly diagnosed GBM were included; 42 patients underwent stereotactic biopsy (unresectable tumors) and 37 patients microsurgical tumor resection. All patients were scheduled to receive radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (RCx/TMZ). (18)FET-PET evaluation using static and dynamic analysis was done before biopsy/resection, after resection, 4 to 6 weeks following RCx, and after 3 cycles of TMZ. Endpoints were survival and progression-free-survival. Prognostic factors were obtained from proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Biological tumor volume before RCx (BTV(preRCx)) was the most important (18)FET-PET-derived imaging biomarker and was independent of MGMT promoter methylation and clinical prognostic factors: patients with smaller BTV(preRCx) had significantly longer progression-free and overall survival (OS). (18)FET time-activity curves (TACs) before treatment and their changes after RCx were also related to outcome; patients with initially increasing TACs experienced longer OS. CONCLUSION: BTV(preRCx) and TAC represent important (18)FET-PET-derived imaging biomarkers in GBM. Increasing TACs are associated with prolonged OS. The BTV(preRCx) is a strong prognostic factor for progression-free survival and OS independent of the mode of surgery. Our data furthermore suggest that patients harboring resectable GBM might benefit from maximal PET-guided tumor resection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/terapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Carga Tumoral , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Quimioradioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Microcirugia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Estudios Prospectivos , Temozolomida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tirosina/análogos & derivados
2.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 34(12): 1933-42, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17763848

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Treatment and prognosis of gliomas depend on their histological tumour grade. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential of [(18)F]fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) PET for non-invasive tumour grading in untreated patients. METHODS: Dynamic FET PET studies were performed in 54 patients who, based on MRI, were estimated to have low grade (LG; n = 20), intermediate (WHO II-III; n = 4) or high grade (HG; n = 30) tumours. For standard evaluation, tumour SUV(max) and the ratio to background (SUV(max)/BG) were calculated (sum image: 20-40 min). For dynamic evaluation, mean SUV values within a 90% isocontour ROI (SUV90) and the SUV90/BG ratios were determined for each time frame to evaluate the course of FET uptake. Results were correlated with histopathological findings from PET-guided stereotactic biopsies. RESULTS: Histology revealed gliomas in all patients. Using the standard method a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was found between LG (n = 20; SUV(max)/BG: 2.16 +/- 0.98) and HG (n = 34; SUV(max)/BG: 3.29 +/- 1.06) gliomas (opt. threshold 2.58: SN71%/SP85%/area under ROC curve [AUC]:0.798), however, with a marked overlap between WHO II to IV tumours. Time activity curves showed slight increase in LG, whereas HG tumours presented with an early peak (10-20 min) followed by a decrease. Dynamic evaluation successfully separated LG from HG gliomas with higher diagnostic accuracy (SN94%/SP100%/AUC:0.967). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the ratio-based method, a statistically significant difference was found between LG and HG gliomas. Due to the interindividual variability, however, no reliable individual grading was possible. In contrast, dynamic evaluation allowed LG and HG gliomas to be differentiated with high diagnostic power and, thus, should supplement the conventional method.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioma/diagnóstico , Glioma/metabolismo , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Femenino , Glioma/clasificación , Humanos , Masculino , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radiofármacos/farmacocinética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estadística como Asunto , Tirosina/farmacocinética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA