Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(8): e2329825, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37594761

RESUMEN

Importance: Understanding how structural racism is associated with adolescent mental health is critical to advance health equity. Objective: To assess associations between neighborhood privilege, measured by the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) and adolescent depressive symptoms, suicidality, and related racial and ethnic disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records of adolescents aged 12 to 16 years who attended well-teen visits between 2017 and 2021. Kaiser Permanente Northern California is an integrated health care delivery system serving 4.6 million members. The cohort included 34 252 individuals born singleton at an affiliated facility from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2009, and who had completed at least 1 mental health screener during a well-teen visit by November 23, 2021. Exposures: American Community Survey 2016 to 2021 5-year estimates were used to calculate ICE scores for adolescents' residential census tract at ages 10 to 11. Three ICE measures were used as proxies of structural racism: racial privilege (ICE-race and ethnicity; hereinafter ICE-race), economic privilege (ICE-income), and combined economic and racial privilege (ICE-income plus race and ethnicity; herinafter ICE-income plus race). ICE scores were categorized into quintiles based on California statewide distributions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Depressive symptoms and suicidality were assessed through self-report screeners during well-teen visits. Depressive symptoms were considered to be present if patients had a score on the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 of 3 or higher (the tool uses a Likert scale to determine the frequency [0 = not at all; 3 = nearly every day] that they had depressed mood and lack of pleasure in usual activities in the past 2 weeks; responses were summed and dichotomized). Results: Analyses included 34 252 adolescents (12-16 years of age; mean [SD] age, 13.7 [0.8] years; 17 557 [51.3%] male, 7284 [21.3%] Asian or Pacific Islander, 2587 [7.6%] Black], 9061 [26.5%] Hispanic, 75 [0.2%] American Indian or Indigenous, 12 176 [35.5%] White, and 3069 [9%] other or unknown). Risks of depressive symptoms and suicidality generally increased with each level of declining neighborhood privilege. Adjusted risk ratios comparing adolescents from neighborhoods with the least to most racial and economic privilege were 1.37 (95% CI, 1.20-1.55) for depressive symptoms and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.23-2.05) for suicidality. Racial disparities between Black and White youth and Hispanic and White youth decreased after adjusting for each ICE measure, and became nonsignificant in models adjusting for ICE-race and ICE-income plus race. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, lower neighborhood privilege was associated with greater risks of adolescent depressive symptoms and suicidality. Furthermore, adjusting for neighborhood privilege reduced mental health disparities affecting Black and Hispanic adolescents. These findings suggest that efforts to promote equity in adolescent mental health should extend beyond the clinical setting and consider the inequitable neighborhood contexts that are shaped by structural racism.


Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Racismo Sistemático , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , California/epidemiología
2.
Clin Epidemiol ; 15: 613-628, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37187769

RESUMEN

Purpose: Children of mothers with prenatal depression have elevated risk for depression later in life. Pregnant women are hesitant to use antidepressants due to fear of adverse fetal effects. To inform prevention, this study examined associations between maternal prenatal depression and antidepressant use, and adolescent depressive symptoms and suicidality. Patients and Methods: Prospective data from 74,695 mother-adolescent dyads from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California integrated healthcare delivery system were used. Three prenatal exposure groups were examined: maternal depression and antidepressants (Med); depression and no antidepressants (No-Med); neither depression nor antidepressants (NDNM). Adolescent depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-2 score ≥3) and suicidality were assessed for 12- to 18-year-olds. Associations were analyzed using mixed effects logistic regression, adjusted for confounders. Results: Maternal prenatal depression was associated with higher odds of adolescent depressive symptoms (Med odds ratio [OR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-1.84; No-Med OR: 1.59, CI: 1.34-1.88) and suicidality (Med OR: 2.36, CI: 1.67-3.34; No-Med OR: 1.54, CI: 1.10-2.14) compared to no prenatal depression (NDNM). Adolescents exposed to prenatal depression and antidepressants were not at greater odds of depressive symptoms (Med OR: 0.95, CI: 0.74-1.21) compared to those not exposed to antidepressants (No-Med). However, they showed non-significant but greater odds of suicidality (Med OR: 1.54, CI: 0.99-2.39). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that maternal prenatal depression is associated with adolescent depressive symptoms and suicidality, and that exposure to antidepressants in utero does not increase risk of depressive symptoms, specifically. While not statistically significant, the increased odds of suicidality among adolescents exposed to antidepressants suggest a possible association; however, further investigation is needed. After replication, the findings of this study may inform shared clinical decision-making when considering options regarding antidepressant use for the treatment of maternal prenatal depression.

3.
PLOS Digit Health ; 2(3): e0000173, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36867639

RESUMEN

Informal caregivers are a critical source of support for cancer patients. However, their perspectives are not routinely collected, despite health impacts related to the burden of caregiving. We created the TOGETHERCare smartphone application (app) to collect observer-reported outcomes regarding the cancer patient's health and caregiver's perceptions of their own mental and physical health, and to provide tips and resources for self-care and patient care. We enrolled 54 caregivers between October 2020 and March 2021 from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated healthcare system. Fifty caregivers used the app for approximately 28 days. Usability and acceptability were assessed using questions from the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), the System Usability Scale (SUS), the Net Promoter Score (NPS), and semi-structured interviews. The caregivers' mean age was 54.4 years, 38% were female and 36% were non-White. The SUS total mean score was 83.4 (SD = 14.2), for a percentile rank of 90-95 ("excellent"). Median MARS responses to the functionality questions were also high. The NPS score of 30 at the end of the study indicated that most caregivers would recommend the app. Themes from semi-structured interviews were consistent across the study period and indicated that the app was easy to use and helpful. Caregivers indicated a need for feedback from the app, suggested some changes to the wording of questions, the app's visuals, and timing of notifications. This study demonstrated that caregivers are willing to complete frequent surveys about themselves and their patients. The app is unique because it provides a remote method to collect caregivers' observations about the patient that may be useful for clinical care. To our knowledge, TOGETHERCare is the first mobile app developed specifically to capture adult cancer patient symptoms from the informal caregiver's perspective. Future research will examine whether use of this app can help improve patient outcomes.

4.
Mindfulness (N Y) ; 12(6): 1387-1397, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33723491

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Traditional mindfulness-based interventions have been shown to reduce depression symptoms in pregnant women, although in-person classes may pose significant accessibility barriers, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mobile technology offers greater convenience, but little is known regarding the efficacy of self-paced, mobile-delivered (mHealth) mindfulness interventions in this population. This study tested the feasibility and acceptability of offering such an intervention for pregnant women with moderate-to-moderately-severe depression symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm trial within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). Participants were identified through KPNC's universal perinatal depression screening program. Eligible participants included English-speaking pregnant women (<28 weeks of gestation) with moderate-to-moderately-severe depressive symptoms without a regular (<3 times/week) mindfulness/meditation practice. Participants were asked to follow a self-paced, 6-week mindfulness meditation program using a mobile app, Headspace™, 10-20 min/day. Outcome measures included feasibility, acceptability, and patient-reported outcomes (e.g., depression symptoms). RESULTS: Of the 27 women enrolled, 20 (74%) completed the study. Over half (55%) of participants used the app ≥50% of the days during the 6-week intervention. Responses to the semi-structured interviews indicated that women appreciated the convenience of the intervention and the ability to engage without having to attend classes or arrange childcare. We observed significant improvements in pre-postintervention scores for depression symptoms, perceived stress, sleep disturbance, and mindfulness. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of an mHealth mindfulness intervention for women with moderate-to-moderately-severe antenatal depression symptoms. The preliminary data further suggest that an efficacy trial is warranted.

5.
Glob Adv Health Med ; 10: 21649561211044693, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35174001

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A metastatic cancer diagnosis is associated with high levels of distress in patients and caregivers, which may be alleviated by mindfulness interventions. Research on scalable, tailored, online mindfulness training programs is needed. We sought to test the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered 8-week mindfulness-based intervention, Being Present 2.0 (BP2.0). METHODS: We performed a single-arm feasibility study of BP2.0 among patients with any metastatic gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy, with or without an informal caregiver. Participants were instructed to practice mindfulness using pre-recorded guided meditations 5 times per week using a study-specific website and to attend a weekly live, interactive virtual meeting facilitated by a trained instructor. The web-based platform enabled direct measurement of adherence. RESULTS: The study enrolled 46 of 74 (62%) patients contacted, together with 23 caregivers (69 participants total), from May to October 2018. Median patient age was 52 (range 20-70 years), 39% were male, 67% non-Hispanic white, 65% had colorectal cancer, and 78% lived outside of San Francisco. The top reasons cited for participation were to reduce stress/anxiety and learn how to meditate. Mean baseline National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN DT) scores were 4.7 (patients) and 5.8 (caregivers). The study discontinuation rate was 20% (eight patients and six caregivers). Among the remaining 55 participants, 43 (78%) listened to at least one audio recording and/or attended at least one virtual meeting, although adherence data was incomplete. The retention rate was 71%, with 39 participants completing at least one follow-up assessment. In post-intervention qualitative interviews, 88% of respondents reported a positive experience. Compared to baseline, participants reported significantly reduced post-intervention NCCN DT scores (mean 3.1; P = .012). CONCLUSION: The BP2.0 online mindfulness-based program is feasible and acceptable for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer and caregivers. These results will guide plans for a follow-up efficacy study. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03528863.

6.
JMIR Ment Health ; 7(11): e17405, 2020 Nov 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33180028

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of women suffer from postpartum depression (PPD). Due to barriers such as limited access to care, half of the women with PPD do not receive treatment. Therefore, it is critical to identify effective and scalable interventions. Traditional mindfulness programs have been effective in reducing depressive symptoms, however access remains a barrier. A self-paced mobile health (mHealth) mindfulness program may fit the lifestyle of busy mothers who are unable to attend in-person classes. However, little is known regarding the feasibility or efficacy of mHealth mindfulness interventions in postpartum women with depressive symptoms. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an mHealth mindfulness intervention for postpartum women with moderate to moderately severe depressive symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm feasibility trial of an mHealth mindfulness intervention within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), a large integrated health care system. Participants were identified through clinician referral and electronic health records via KPNC's universal perinatal depression screening program and recruited by the study team. Inclusion criteria included the following: English-speaking, up to 6 months postpartum with a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) score of 10 to 19, and no regular mindfulness/meditation practice. Participants were asked to use a mindfulness app, Headspace, 10 to 20 min/day for 6 weeks. Baseline and postintervention surveys captured data on patient-reported outcomes (depression and stress symptoms, sleep quality, and mindfulness). Semistructured interviews captured acceptability. Retention and adherence were used to assess feasibility. RESULTS: Of the 115 women who were contacted and met the eligibility criteria or declined participation before eligibility assessment, 27 (23%) were enrolled. In addition, 70% (19/27) completed the study. The mean age of participants was 31 years (SD 5.2), 30% (8/27) were non-Hispanic White, and, on average, participants were 12.3 weeks postpartum (SD 5.7). Of the women who completed the study, 100% (19/19) used the Headspace app at least once, and nearly half (9/19, 47%) used the app on ≥50% of the days during the 6-week intervention period. Of the 16 participants who completed the postintervention interview, 69% (11/16) reported that they were very or extremely satisfied with the app. Interviews indicated that women appreciated the variety of meditations and felt that the program led to reduced anxiety and improved sleep. Significant improvements in pre- and postintervention scores were observed for depressive symptoms (PHQ-8: -3.8, P=.004), perceived stress (10-item Perceived Stress Scale: -6.0, P=.005), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: -2.1, P=.02, indicating less sleep disturbance). Improvements in mindfulness were also significant (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form: 10.9, P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: An mHealth mindfulness intervention for postpartum women with moderate to moderately severe depressive symptoms is feasible and acceptable. An efficacy trial is warranted.

7.
Psychooncology ; 2020 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979294

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assess the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing technology-delivered mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) programs against a waitlist control arm targeting advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers. METHODS: Two-arm cluster RCT within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We recruited patients with metastatic solid malignancies or hematological cancers and their informal caregivers. Intervention-group participants chose to use either a commercially available mindfulness app (10-20 min/day) or a webinar-based mindfulness course for 6 weeks. The waitlist control group received usual care. We assessed feasibility measures and obtained participant-reported data on quality of life (QoL; primary outcome) and distress outcomes (secondary) pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: A hundred and three patients (median age 67 years; 70% female; 81% White) and 39 caregivers (median age 66 years; 79% female; 69% White) were enrolled. Nearly all participants chose the mindfulness app over the webinar-based program. Among the participants in the intervention arm who chose the mobile-app program and completed the postintervention (6-week) survey, 21 (68%) patients and 7 (47%) caregivers practiced mindfulness at least 50% of the days during the 6-week study period. Seventy-four percent of intervention participants were "very" or "extremely" satisfied with the mindfulness program. We observed improvements in anxiety, QoL, and mindfulness among patients in the intervention arm compared to those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a cluster RCT of mHealth MBI for advanced cancer patients and their caregivers. Such remote interventions can be helpful particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

8.
Integr Cancer Ther ; 18: 1534735419850634, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092044

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a mobile/online-based (mHealth) mindfulness intervention for cancer patients and their caregivers to reduce distress and improve quality of life (QoL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two-arm randomized controlled trial within Kaiser Permanente Northern California targeting cancer patients who received chemotherapy and their informal caregivers. The intervention group received a commercially available mindfulness program for 8 weeks. The wait-list control group received usual care. We assessed feasibility using retention and adherence rates and obtained participant-reported data on distress, QoL, sleep, mindfulness, and posttraumatic growth before and immediately after the intervention. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (median age 59 years; female 69%; 65% whites) and 31 caregivers (median age 63 years; female 58%; 77% whites) were randomized. Among randomized participants, 74% of the patients and 84% of the caregivers completed the study. Among those in the intervention arm who initiated the mindfulness program, 65% practiced at least 50% of the days during the intervention period. We observed significantly greater improvement in QoL among patients in the intervention arm compared with controls. Caregivers in the intervention group experienced increased mindfulness compared with controls. Participants appreciated the convenience of the intervention and the mindfulness skills they obtained from the program. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial of an mHealth mindfulness intervention for cancer patients and their informal caregivers. Results from fully powered efficacy trials would inform the potential for clinicians to use this scalable intervention to help improve QoL of those affected by cancer and their caregivers.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Atención Plena/métodos , Neoplasias/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica/fisiología , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Meditación/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telemedicina/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0199423, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30036361

RESUMEN

A metastatic cancer diagnosis is associated with high levels of distress in patients and caregivers. Mindfulness interventions can reduce distress and improve quality of life in cancer patients. However, standard mindfulness training relies on in-person instruction, which is often not practical for either patients receiving chemotherapy or their caregivers. In the Being Present single arm pilot study, we designed and tested an 8-week audio-based mindfulness meditation program for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy with or without a participating caregiver. The study accrued 33 of 74 (45%) eligible patients consenting together with 20 family caregivers (53 participants total) within nine months. Forty-one participants were evaluable (77%); 10 of 12 cases of attrition were attributable to hospitalization or death. Median participant age was 51 (range 21-78 years); 38% were men. Baseline levels of distress were similar in patients and caregivers. The top reasons for participation cited in pre-intervention interviews were to increase relaxation/calm, improve mood/emotions, and reduce stress/anxiety. In measures of adherence, 59% of responses to weekly texts asking: "Have you practiced today?" were "Yes" and 59% of interviewees reported practicing >50% of the time. Compared to baseline, post-intervention surveys demonstrated significantly reduced distress (p = 0.01) and anxiety (p = 0.03); as well as increased non-reactivity (p<0.01), and feeling at peace (p<0.01). Post-intervention qualitative interviews, where 71% of participants reported benefit, were consistent with quantitative findings. In the interviews, participants spontaneously described reduced stress/anxiety and increased relaxation/calm. Benefits appeared to be accentuated in patient-caregiver pairs as compared to unpaired patients. Seventy-nine percent of participants reported plans for continued practice after study completion. We conclude that the Being Present audio-based mindfulness meditation program is of interest to, feasible, and acceptable for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and caregivers, with initial evidence of efficacy. These results will guide plans for a follow-up study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02423720.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Atención Plena , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Plena/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Calidad de Vida , Estrés Psicológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 170(3): 623-631, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29671113

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We evaluated associations between personal and clinical social support and non-adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in a large, Northern California breast cancer (BC) cohort from an integrated healthcare network. METHODS: This study included 3382 women from the Pathways Study diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 with stages I-III hormone receptor-positive BC and who responded to the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support and Interpersonal Processes of Care surveys, approximately 2 months post-diagnosis. We used logistic regression to evaluate associations between tertiles of social support and non-initiation (< 2 consecutive prescription fills within a year after diagnosis). Among those who initiated treatment, we used proportional hazards regression to evaluate associations with discontinuation (≥ 90 day gap) and non-adherence (< 80% medical possession ratio). RESULTS: Of those who initiated AET (79%), approximately one-fourth either discontinued AET or were non-adherent. AET non-initiation was more likely in women with moderate (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.96-1.46) or low (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.62) versus high personal social support (P trend = 0.02). Women with moderate (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.99-1.45) or low (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.60) personal social support were also more likely to discontinue treatment (P trend = 0.01). Furthermore, women with moderate (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02-1.53) or low (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.12-1.70) personal social support had higher non-adherence (P trend = 0.007). Associations with clinical social support and outcomes were similar. Notably, high clinical social support mitigated the risk of discontinuation when patients' personal support was moderate or low (P value = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Women with low personal or clinical social support had higher AET non-adherence. Clinician teams may need to fill support gaps that compromise treatment adherence.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Apoyo Social , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos
12.
Am J Epidemiol ; 184(1): 7-14, 2016 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27268032

RESUMEN

We investigated whether in utero exposure to maternal pregravid obesity and/or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) was associated with early puberty in girls. We used data from a longitudinal study of 421 mother-daughter pairs enrolled in an integrated health services organization, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (2005-2012). Girls aged 6-8 years were followed annually through ages 12-14 years. Onset of puberty was assessed using study clinic-based Tanner staging. We examined associations of self-reported pregravid obesity and maternal GDM with timing of the daughter's transition to pubertal maturation stage 2 or above for development of breasts and pubic hair, using accelerated failure time regression models with interval censoring to estimate time ratios and hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Maternal obesity (pregravid body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) ≥30) was associated with a daughter's earlier transition to breast and pubic hair stage 2+ in comparison with girls whose mothers had pregravid BMI <25. These associations were attenuated and not statistically significant after adjustment for covariates. Girls whose mothers had both pregravid BMI ≥25 and GDM were at higher risk of an earlier transition to pubic hair stage 2+ than those whose mothers had neither condition (adjusted time ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.83, 0.96; hazard ratio = 2.97, 95% confidence interval: 1.52, 5.83). These findings suggest that exposure to maternal obesity and hyperglycemia places girls at higher risk of earlier pubarche.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional , Obesidad , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Pubertad , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia , Estudios Longitudinales , Embarazo
13.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 14: 144, 2014 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25125219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common gastrointestinal disease, and the cost of health care and lost productivity due to GERD is extremely high. Recently described side effects of long-term acid suppression have increased the interest in nonpharmacologic methods for alleviating GERD symptoms. We aimed to examine whether GERD patients follow recommended dietary guidelines, and if adherence is associated with the severity and frequency of reflux symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California population, comparing 317 GERD patients to 182 asymptomatic population controls. All analyses adjusted for smoking and education. RESULTS: GERD patients, even those with moderate to severe symptoms or frequent symptoms, were as likely to consume tomato products and large portion meals as GERD-free controls and were even more likely to consume soft drinks and tea [odds ratio (OR) = 2.01 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-3.61; OR = 2.63 95% CI 1.24-5.59, respectively] and eat fried foods and high fat diet. The only reflux-triggering foods GERD patients were less likely to consume were citrus and alcohol [OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35-0.97 for citrus; OR = 0.41 95% CI 0.19-0.87 for 1 + drink/day of alcohol]. The associations were similar when we excluded users of proton pump inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: GERD patients consume many putative GERD causing foods as frequently or even more frequently than asymptomatic patients despite reporting symptoms. These findings suggest that, if dietary modification is effective in reducing GERD, substantial opportunities for nonpharmacologic interventions exist for many GERD patients.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Alimentaria , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/dietoterapia , Pirosis/dietoterapia , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Bebidas Gaseosas , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Citrus , Estudios Transversales , Dieta con Restricción de Grasas/estadística & datos numéricos , Dieta Alta en Grasa/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Pirosis/etiología , Humanos , Solanum lycopersicum , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Fumar/epidemiología , , Adulto Joven
14.
Int J Yoga Therap ; (21): 77-83, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22398347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is highly prevalent and the most costly cardiovascular illness in the United States. Yoga is known to be effective in lowering stress, lessening depression, and increasing physical fitness and may be used as an adjuvant management program for CHF patients. PRIMARY STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a yoga intervention program among a multiethnic CHF population living in underserved neighborhoods. METHODS: Uncontrolled intervention trial. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers, Richmond and Oakland, California. PARTICIPANTS: 14 CHF patients (7 female), mean age 64 (SD=6.4) years, and 62% African-American. INTERVENTION: Eight-week, 2x/week, 1-hr yoga classes that included meditation, breathing exercises, gentle yoga poses, and relaxation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The intervention feasibility was measured by recruitment rates, participant retention and adherence. Body weight and self-reported depression and quality of life were measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Among the 14 patients enrolled, 13 completed the intervention. Of those who completed the trial, 92% attended at least 50% of the classes. There was a significant reduction in weight (-3.5 lb, p=0.01) and improvement in the severity of depression (p<0.05), as well as a trend toward increased quality of life (p=08). No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot trial demonstrates that it is feasible for patients with CHF to incorporate yoga into their lifestyle. Yoga may help with routine disease management, prevention of fluid retention, and improvement of depression and quality of life. A larger trial is needed to confirm efficacy and to determine the long-term effects on other important outcomes, such as hospital re-admission rates or prognostic biomarkers.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/psicología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Yoga , California , Etnicidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Área sin Atención Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Nutr Res Rev ; 23(2): 230-46, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20624335

RESUMEN

Incidence rates for oesophageal adenocarcinoma have increased by over 500% during the past few decades without clear reasons. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, obesity and smoking have been identified as risk factors, although the demographic distribution of these risk factors is not consistent with the demographic distribution of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, which is substantially more common among whites and males than any other demographic groups. Numerous epidemiological studies have suggested associations between dietary factors and the risks of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor, Barrett's oesophagus, though a comprehensive review is lacking. The main aim of the present review is to consider the evidence linking dietary factors with the risks of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, Barrett's oesophagus, and the progression from Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The existing epidemiological evidence is strongest for an inverse relationship between intake of vitamin C, ß-carotene, fruits and vegetables, particularly raw fruits and vegetables and dark green, leafy and cruciferous vegetables, carbohydrates, fibre and Fe and the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's oesophagus. Patients at higher risk for Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma may benefit from increasing their consumption of fruits and vegetables and reducing their intake of red meat and other processed food items. Further research is needed to evaluate the relationship between diet and the progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Evidence from cohort studies will help determine whether randomised chemoprevention trials are warranted for the primary prevention of Barrett's oesophagus or its progression to cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/prevención & control , Esófago de Barrett/prevención & control , Dieta , Neoplasias Esofágicas/prevención & control , Micronutrientes/uso terapéutico , Fibras de la Dieta/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Frutas , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Verduras
16.
Gastroenterology ; 139(1): 93-101, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20353792

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Drugs that inhibit gastric acid might increase the risk of hip fracture. However, little long-term exposure data exist and no large studies have been conducted in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using data from an integrated health services organization. We evaluated 33,752 patients with incident diagnoses of hip/femur fractures (cases), 130,471 matched members without fractures (controls), prescription data for use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) (up to 10 years' cumulative duration), and confounders. RESULTS: Patients with hip fractures were more likely than controls to have previously received a > or =2-year supply of PPIs (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.39) or H2RAs (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29). The risk was reduced after discontinuation of medication (OR of 1.30 [95% CI, 1.21-1.41] for current PPI users vs OR of 1.09 [95% CI, 0.64-1.85] for patients who received their last prescription 2-2.9 years ago). Higher dosages (but not increasing cumulative durations) were associated with increased risk (eg, > or =1.5 pills/day: OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.64]; <0.74 pills/day: OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.94-1.33]). Excess fracture risk for PPI use was only present among persons with at least one other fracture risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Use of drugs that inhibit gastric acid is associated with an increased risk of hip fracture; however, this association was only found among persons with at least one other risk factor for hip fracture. Acid inhibition might therefore be associated with fracture risk in persons already at risk for osteoporosis, although other confounding cannot be excluded.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/inducido químicamente , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Nutr Cancer ; 61(5): 607-16, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19838934

RESUMEN

Animal and human models suggest associations between fat intake, fiber intake, and the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We evaluated whether these factors may act early in the carcinogenic pathway as a risk factor for Barrett's esophagus, a potentially premalignant precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma using a case-control design within the Kaiser Permanente, Northern California population. Incident Barrett's esophagus cases (n = 296) were matched to persons with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (n = 308) and to population controls (n = 309). Higher intakes of omega-3-fatty-acids [cases vs. population controls; OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.97, 4th vs. 1st quartiles of intake], polyunsaturated fat, total fiber (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15-0.76), and fiber from fruits and vegetables (OR = 0.47 95% CI = 0.25-0.88) were associated with a lower risk of Barrett's esophagus. Higher meat intakes were associated with a lower risk of long-segment Barrett's esophagus (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.09-0.72). In contrast, higher trans-fat intakes were associated with increased risk (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.03-1.21 per g/day). Total fat intake, barbecued foods, and fiber intake from sources other than fruits and vegetables were not associated with Barrett's esophagus. Future studies to evaluate whether dietary interventions might influence the risk of Barrett's esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma in high risk persons are needed.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/epidemiología , Grasas de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Fibras de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Carne , Lesiones Precancerosas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Culinaria/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones Precancerosas/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Ácidos Grasos trans/administración & dosificación , Ácidos Grasos trans/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
18.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 69(6): 1004-10, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19152897

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of a Barrett's esophagus diagnosis is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of a clinical Barrett's esophagus diagnosis and the reproducibility of an esophageal intestinal metaplasia diagnosis. METHODS: All patients with a Barrett's esophagus diagnosis between 1994 and 2005 were identified by use of International Classification of Disease (ICD) and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) coding. Subsets received manual record review (endoscopy/pathology reports), slide review by a referral pathologist (interrater reliability), and 2 blinded reviews by the same pathologist (intrarater reliability). SETTING: An integrated health services delivery system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Accuracy of electronic clinical diagnosis and reproducibility of esophageal intestinal metaplasia diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 2470 patients coded with Barrett's esophagus underwent record review; a subgroup (616) received manual pathology slide review. Review confirmed a Barrett's esophagus diagnosis for 1533 (61.9%) patients: 437 of 798 subjects (54.8%) with a SNOMED diagnosis alone, 153 of 671 subjects (26.8%) with an ICD diagnosis alone, and 940 of 1101 subjects (85%) who had both a SNOMED and an ICD diagnosis. The same metaplasia diagnosis occurred with 88.3% of subjects (original vs referral pathologist, interrater reliability; kappa = .42, 95% CI, 0.34-0.48). The referral pathologist made the same metaplasia diagnosis twice for a given patient for 88.6% of subjects (intrarater reliability, 2 reviews by same pathologist; kappa = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.35-0.93). LIMITATIONS: The accuracy of a Barrett's esophagus diagnosis likely represents the minimum number, given the strict criteria. CONCLUSIONS: A community pathologist's diagnosis of esophageal intestinal metaplasia is likely to be confirmed by a referral pathologist. Electronic diagnoses of Barrett's esophagus overestimate the prevalence, although they are usually confirmed in patients with both a SNOMED and ICD diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esófago de Barrett/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagoscopía , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Biopsia , Errores Diagnósticos , Esófago/patología , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Auditoría Médica , Metaplasia , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine
19.
Gastroenterology ; 136(3): 806-15, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19111726

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the effects of alcohol use and sociodemographics on the risk of Barrett's esophagus, a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the association between alcohol use, alcohol type, sociodemographic profiles, other lifestyle factors, and the risk of Barrett's esophagus. METHODS: With the use of a case-control study within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California membership, patients with a new diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (n = 320) diagnosed between 2002 and 2005 were matched to persons with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; n = 316) and to population controls (n = 317). We collected information using validated questionnaires during direct in-person interviews. Analyses used multivariate unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Total alcohol use was not significantly associated with the risk of Barrett's esophagus, although stratification by beverage type showed an inverse association for wine drinkers compared with nondrinkers (>/=7 drinks of wine per week vs none: odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.99; multivariate analysis). Among population controls, those who preferred wine were more likely to have college degrees and regularly take vitamin supplements than those who preferred beer or liquor, although adjustment for these factors or GERD symptoms did not eliminate the inverse association between wine consumption and Barrett's esophagus. Education status was significantly inversely associated with the risk of Barrett's esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: There are associations between alcohol types, socioeconomic status, and the risk of Barrett's esophagus. Although choice of alcoholic beverages was associated with several factors, multiple adjustments (including for GERD) did not eliminate the association between alcohol and Barrett's esophagus. Further research to evaluate the associations among socioeconomic status, GERD, and Barrett's esophagus is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Esófago de Barrett/epidemiología , Cerveza/estadística & datos numéricos , Vino/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , California/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/epidemiología , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
20.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 103(12): 2997-3004, 2008 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18853987

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: High iron stores are a proposed modifiable risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, but minimal human data exist. We evaluated whether iron intake and iron stores were associated with Barrett's esophagus, a metaplastic change that is a strong risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California population. We identified all persons with a new diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (cases); they were matched to persons with GERD (without Barrett's esophagus) and to population controls. Subjects completed examinations, dietary questionnaires, and testing for serum iron stores (ferritin and transferrin saturation). Analyses used unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: We evaluated 319 cases, 312 GERD patients, and 313 population controls. Compared with population controls, Barrett's esophagus patients had lower dietary iron intakes (4th vs 1st quartiles, odds ratio [OR]= 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.80), similar total iron intakes (including supplement use), and lower iron stores (4th vs 1st quartiles, ferritin OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.14-0.40;% transferrin saturation OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.41-1.04; P value trend <0.01 and 0.03, respectively). Similar associations were observed in comparisons with GERD controls and among subjects without clear sources of blood loss on endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus had lower dietary iron intakes and lower serum iron stores than controls in our population. These findings do not provide support for the current hypothesis that high iron stores or a high iron intake are risk factors for Barrett's esophagus, a potential early event in the carcinogenic sequence for esophageal adenocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Esófago de Barrett/fisiopatología , Ferritinas/metabolismo , Hierro/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Adenocarcinoma/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Esófago de Barrett/complicaciones , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Hierro de la Dieta/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA