National guideline concordance and outcomes for pathologic N2 disease in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Real-world treatment practices for positive mediastinal nodal disease in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to vary despite guidelines. We aim to assess national trends in the treatment of pathologic-N2 disease, and evaluate the association with clinical nodal staging and timing of systemic therapy. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy and had pathologic-N2 disease from 2010-2017. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline concordance was evaluated. cN2 patients were analyzed based on timing of systemic therapy and response. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated outcomes by type of systemic therapy. Survival analysis utilized Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 10,225 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-four percent of patients were understaged prior to surgery as either cN0 or cN1. Of clinically staged N2 patients, 56% received NCCN recommended neoadjuvant therapy. Annual guideline concordance increased until 2016 to a max of 62.9%. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy showed an overall survival benefit compared with no systemic therapy (HR 0.54 & 0.57), but no difference when compared against each other. Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival (5-year OS 56.1%, P<0.001), while partial response, no-response, and adjuvant therapy were similar. All systemic treatment strategies improved survival compared with no systemic therapy (5-year OS 24.5%). Conclusions: Guideline concordance for treatment of cN2 disease has been increasing, but still not followed in over 1/3 of patients. Responsiveness to neoadjuvant therapy appears to be a predictor of survival, and may become a prognostic adjunct for determining which patients would benefit from additional systemic therapy.

The Effect of Commonly Used Local Anesthetic on Bacterial Growth.

INTRODUCTION: Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has emerged as a superior form of local anesthetic across numerous surgical subspecialties. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ex-vivo antimicrobial effects of LB in comparison with traditional local anesthetics. METHODS: A standardized inoculum of bacteria commonly associated with surgical site infection was inoculated into a suspension of 1% lidocaine, 0.25% bupivacaine, Exparel (proprietary liposomally packaged 1.3% bupivacaine), and normal saline as a growth control. RESULTS: In all five bacteria tested, the medium inoculated with traditional local anesthetics reduced growth to a greater degree than LB-inoculated plates. Both conventional local anesthetics reduced the growth of all bacteria when compared with the control with the exception of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus growth in bupivacaine. LB-inoculated plates had equivalent growth to the control in all plates with the exception of Escherichia coli plates which demonstrated superior growth. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this simple ex-vivo model suggest that the liposomal packaging of bupivacaine may decrease this local anesthetic's innate antibacterial properties.

Overall survival is improved with total thyroidectomy and radiation for male patients and patients older than 55 with T2N0M0 Stage 1 classic papillary thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: We examine whether surgery extent and radiation administration affect overall survival for cT2N0M0 classic papillary thyroid cancer according to age and sex. METHODS: Patients with cT2N0M0 classic papillary thyroid cancer tumors in the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2016) were selected. Multivariable Cox regression analysis compared patients (combined male + female cohorts) having lobectomy to those having total thyroidectomy with or without radiation (primarily radioactive iodine) for ages: 18 to 45, 46 to 55, and >55 years. In addition, 1:1 propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier curves with 10-year overall survival estimates, and log-rank test were stratified by age and sex. RESULTS: Lobectomy had equivalent overall survival to total thyroidectomy without and with radiation for patients (combined male + female cohorts) aged 18 to 45 and 46 to 55 years on multivariable analysis. On propensity score matching there was overall survival advantage for total thyroidectomy with radiation over both lobectomy and total thyroidectomy for men (ages 18-90+ combined) and overall survival advantage in patients (combined male + female cohort) aged >55 years having total thyroidectomy with radiation versus lobectomy. On propensity score matching there were no overall survival differences in women (ages 18-90+ combined) or patients (combined male + female cohort) aged 18 to 45 and 46 to 55 years having either lobectomy, total thyroidectomy, or total thyroidectomy with radiation. CONCLUSION: For cT2N0M0 classic papillary thyroid cancer, total thyroidectomy with radiation improves 10-year overall survival for patients (combined male + female cohort) aged >55 years and men (ages 18-90+ combined).

Radioactive iodine does not improve overall survival for patients with aggressive variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma less than 2 cm.

BACKGROUND: Tall cell and diffuse sclerosing variants of papillary thyroid cancer are associated with aggressive features. Radioactive iodine after total thyroidectomy is poorly studied. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2016 with classic papillary thyroid cancer, tall cell, or diffuse sclerosing 1 mm to 40 mm were identified. Logistic regression identified factors associated with aggressive features. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests, after propensity score matching for clinicopathological and treatment variables. RESULTS: A total of 155,940 classic papillary thyroid cancer patients, 4,011 tall cell, and 507 diffuse sclerosing were identified. Tall cell patients represented an increasing proportion of the study population during the analysis period, whereas diffuse sclerosing and classic papillary thyroid cancer patients showed a statistically significant decline. Extrathyroidal extension and nodal involvement were more prevalent among tall cell and diffuse sclerosing patients when compared to those diagnosed with classic papillary thyroid cancer (P < .01). Adjuvant radioactive iodine was less frequently used in patients with classic papillary thyroid cancer when compared to tall cell and diffuse sclerosing patients (42.6% vs 62.4%, 59.0%; P < .001, respectively). Aggressive variants receiving total thyroidectomy versus total thyroidectomy + radioactive iodine propensity score matched across clinicopathologic variables were analyzed. There was no difference in overall survival between the 2 treatment groups for tumors <2 cm (01-1.0 cm, 92.2% vs 84.8%; P = .98); (1.0-2.0 cm, 72.7% vs 88.1%; P = .82). However, overall survival was improved for total thyroidectomy + radioactive iodine propensity score matched patients with tumor sizes 21 to 40 mm versus total thyroidectomy (83.4% vs 70.0%, P = .004). CONCLUSION: For aggressive tumor variants ≤2 cm treated with total thyroidectomy, there is no overall survival advantage provided by the addition of adjuvant radioactive iodine.

Costs Associated With Imaging Surveillance After Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends imaging within 6 months after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Further imaging is recommended only if the patient has symptoms or abnormal findings on physical examination. However, in many instances, asymptomatic patients continue to have imaging evaluations. Objectives: To assess practice patterns in surveillance imaging in patients with HNC and evaluate the costs associated with these imaging practices. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-institution retrospective economic evaluation study screened 435 patients to identify patients newly diagnosed with head and neck mucosal and salivary gland malignant tumors between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Data analyses were performed from October 25, 2018, to November 24, 2020. Exposure: Imaging practice patterns. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number and costs of imaging studies during the surveillance period for all patients, patients who remained disease free, and patients who developed recurrence. Results: A total of 136 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 62 [14] years; 84 [61.8%] male; 106 [77.9%] White) with HNC were included in the study. The oropharynx was the most common subsite (64 [47.1%]), most HNCs were stage IVA (62 [45.6%]), and most patients received definitive radiation-based treatment (71 [52.2%]). During the median surveillance period of 3.2 years (range, 0.3-6.8 years), a mean (SD) of 14 (10) imaging studies were performed for all patients, with a mean (SD) total cost of $36 800 ($24 500). In patients who remained disease free, a mean (SD) of 13 (10) imaging studies were performed during the surveillance period, with a mean (SD) total cost of $35 000 ($21 700). Patients who lacked symptoms had a mean (SD) of 4 (3) studies performed per year, resulting in a mean cost of $9600 ($5900) per year. Patients who developed recurrence had more studies per year of follow-up (mean difference, 5.0; 95% CI, 3.4-6.6) and higher associated mean costs (mean difference, $10 600; 95% CI, $6100-$15 000) than patients who remained disease free. Conclusions and Relevance: In this economic evaluation study, many patients treated for HNCs received imaging studies beyond what is recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. These findings suggest that the cost burden of imaging in the asymptomatic patient needs to be considered against the value obtained from routine imaging in this current health care environment.

Comparing short-term patient outcomes after fundoplication performed over a traditional bougie versus a functional lumen imaging probe.

BACKGROUND: The functional lumen imaging probe is a balloon-based catheter that can be used as a bougie during fundoplication. Our goal was to compare the short-term, quality-of-life outcomes and esophageal-injury rate after fundoplication over a functional lumen imaging probe compared to a traditional bougie. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a quality database at a single center. Three-week and 6-month Reflux Symptom Index, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-health Related Quality of Life, and dysphagia scores were compared. The need for endoscopy and dilation between the groups was also compared. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2020, 423 fundoplications were performed over a bougie and 62 over the functional lumen imaging probe. Six months after surgery, the functional lumen imaging probe group reported significantly worse dysphagia scores (1.5 ± 1.0 vs 1.1 ± 0.3, P = .007), but rates of endoscopy (4.8% vs 5.0%, P = .966) and dilation (4.8% vs 3.8%, P = .723) were similar. There were no differences between Reflux Symptom Index and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-health Related Quality of Life scores. The rate of bougie-related injuries was 2.1% vs 0% for the functional lumen imaging probe group. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing fundoplication over the functional lumen imaging probe had comparable short-term outcomes compared with those over a traditional bougie. The rate of esophageal injury while using the functional lumen imaging probe is lower than a bougie and may be preferable for fundoplication creation.

Artificial urinary sphincter longevity following transurethral resection of the prostate in the setting of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Refractory urinary incontinence after channel transurethral resection of the prostate (cTURP) (TURP in the setting of prostate cancer) is a rare occurrence treated with artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). We sought to characterize those patients receiving AUS after cTURP and understand device longevity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients who underwent cTURP and AUS placement in SEER-Medicare from 2002 to 2014. We analyzed factors affecting device longevity using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. We performed propensity matching to accurately compare patients receiving AUS after cTURP to those receiving AUS after radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: For patients undergoing cTURP, 201 out of 56,957 ultimately underwent AUS placement (< 0.5%). AUS after cTURP incurred a 48.4% rate of reoperation versus 30.9% after RP. Importantly, patients undergoing cTURP were significantly older than those undergoing RP [75 vs. 71 years of age (p < 0.01)]. At 3 years after insertion, 28.2% of patients after RP required reoperation compared to 37.8% of patients post-cTURP (p < 0.01). There were no detectable differences in revision rates for those patients who underwent traditional vs. laser cTURP. Patients with a history of radiation therapy had significantly shorter device survival. Even after propensity matching, patients receiving AUS after cTURP incurred more short-term complications compared to AUS after RP. Differences in device longevity were diminished after propensity match. CONCLUSIONS: In the SEER-Medicare population, AUS after cTURP remains rare. While there is an increased risk of infectious complications, AUS after cTURP fared similarly to AUS after RP in terms of device longevity. A history of radiation therapy leads to worse outcome for all patients.