HYAL4-V1/Chondroitinase (Chase) Drives Gemcitabine Resistance and Predicts Chemotherapy Failure in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens are first-line for several advanced cancers. Because of better tolerability, gemcitabine + cisplatin is a preferred neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and/or palliative chemotherapy regimen for advanced bladder cancer. Nevertheless, predicting treatment failure and overcoming resistance remain unmet clinical needs. We discovered that splice variant (V1) of HYAL-4 is a first-in-class eukaryotic chondroitinase (Chase), and CD44 is its major substrate. V1 is upregulated in bladder cancer and drives a malignant phenotype. In this study, we investigated whether V1 drives chemotherapy resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: V1 expression was measured in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) specimens by qRT-PCR and IHC. HYAL-4 wild-type (Wt) and V1 were stably expressed or silenced in normal urothelial and three bladder cancer cell lines. Transfectants were analyzed for chemoresistance and associated mechanism in preclinical models. RESULTS: V1 levels in MIBC specimens of patients who developed metastasis, predicted response to gemcitabine + cisplatin adjuvant/salvage treatment and disease-specific mortality. V1-expressing bladder cells were resistant to gemcitabine but not to cisplatin. V1 expression neither affected gemcitabine influx nor the drug-efflux transporters. Instead, V1 increased gemcitabine metabolism and subsequent efflux of difluorodeoxyuridine, by upregulating cytidine deaminase (CDA) expression through increased CD44-JAK2/STAT3 signaling. CDA inhibitor tetrahydrouridine resensitized V1-expressing cells to gemcitabine. While gemcitabine (25-50 mg/kg) inhibited bladder cancer xenograft growth, V1-expressing tumors were resistant. Low-dose combination of gemcitabine and tetrahydrouridine abrogated the growth of V1 tumors with minimal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: V1/Chase drives gemcitabine resistance and potentially predicts gemcitabine + cisplatin failure. CDA inhibition resensitizes V1-expressing tumors to gemcitabine. Because several chemotherapy regimens include gemcitabine, our study could have broad significance.

Patterns of Progression After 68Ga-PSMA-Ligand PET/CT-Guided Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the patterns of progression after 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligand positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided radiation therapy (RT) for recurrent oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and eight patients with increased prostate-specific antigen levels, who received 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT-guided RT for recurrent oligometastatic disease after primary therapy for PCa were included. The biochemical progression-free survival and distant disease-free survival after PSMA-ligand PET/CT-guided RT were determined. The patterns of progression were determined using renewed 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT in patients with biochemical progression and compared with the clinical target volume of the 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT-guided RT. The frequency of infield and outfield relapses was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 97.2% (105 of 108) of patients showed a decrease in prostate-specific antigen levels after RT and were classified as biochemical responders. After the median follow-up of 18 months, 43.5% (47 of 108) of the patients experienced biochemical progression, resulting in an estimated biochemical progression-free survival of 16 months. Renewed 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT allowed localization of recurrent disease in 91.7% (33 of 36) of patients. Analysis of the patterns of progression resulted in a cumulative infield relapse rate of 12.1% (4 of 33) and a cumulative outfield relapse rate of 87.9% (29 of 33). The resultant median disease-free survival was 11 months. In terms of the pattern of progression, we observed a shift in the pattern of metastases toward skeletal involvement and distant lymph node metastases. Of these patients, 45.5% (15 of 33) were treated with further RT to delay initiation or escalation of systemic therapies. CONCLUSION: PSMA-ligand PET/CT-guided RT for relapsed PCa with limited tumor burden allowed individualization of treatment approaches, provided effective local control, and resulted in considerably prolonged biochemical progression-free survival. As indicated by the PSMA-ligand PET/CT-based patterns of progression, repeated PET/CT-guided RT may represent a treatment option in well-selected patients with relapse after RT for oligometastatic disease.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Effectiveness and Adverse Effects of Different Systemic Treatments for Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

CONTEXT: While vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition are effective strategies in treating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most effective therapeutic approach for patients with non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC) is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review relevant literature comparing the oncological outcomes and adverse events of different systemic therapies for patients with metastatic non-ccRCC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Relevant databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 24, 2016. Only comparative studies were included. Risk of bias and confounding assessments were performed. A meta-analysis was planned for and only performed if methodologically appropriate; otherwise, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The literature search identified 812 potential titles and abstracts. Five randomized controlled trials, recruiting a total of 365 patients, were included. Three studies compared sunitinib against everolimus, one of which reported the results for non-ccRCC as a subgroup rather than as an entire randomized cohort. Individually, the studies showed a trend towards favoring sunitinib in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS; Everolimus versus Sunitinib in Patients with Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41, 80% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.92 and 1.41, 95% CI: 0.88-2.27, Evaluation in Metastatic Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.67-2.01, Efficacy and Safety Comparison of RAD001 Versus Sunitinib in the First-line and Second-line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.9-2.8), but this trend did not reach statistical significance in any study. Meta-analysis was performed on two studies which solely recruited patients with non-ccRCC reporting on PFS, the results of which were inconclusive (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.91-1.86). Sunitinib was associated with more Grade 3-4 adverse events than everolimus, although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis represent a robust summary of the evidence base for systemic treatment of metastatic non-ccRCC. The results show a trend towards favoring vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy for PFS and overall survival compared with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, although statistical significance was not reached. The relative benefits and harms of these treatments remain uncertain. Further research, either in the form of an individual patient data meta-analysis involving all relevant trials, or a randomized controlled trial with sufficient power to detect potential differences between treatments, is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: We examined the literature to determine the most effective treatments for advanced kidney cancer patients whose tumors are not of the clear cell subtype. The results suggest that a drug called sunitinib might be more effective than everolimus, but the statistics supporting this statement are not yet entirely reliable. Further research is required to clarify this unmet medical need.

Segmental dosimetry, toxicity and long-term outcome in patients with prostate cancer treated with permanent seed implants.

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: The development of side effects characteristic for the different treatment methods with impact on the patients' quality of life plays a growing role for individual patients with early stage prostate cancer. Using permanent brachytherapy a high dose to the prostate can be applied with a steep dose gradient to the normal tissue. However, small partial volumes of normal tissue may be exposed to high doses inducing special side effects including lower urinary tract symptoms and/or erectile dysfunction. In the literature there are only few publications so far regarding segmental dosimetry and its influence on side effects and the results are conflicting. We could not identify any dosimetric parameter in segmental dosimetry that may have an influence at certain time intervals on the development of side effects such as lower urinary tract symptoms or erectile dysfunction. However, we could state clearly that the preoperative situation is the most important factor for postoperative outcome. OBJECTIVE: To report on the side effects of patients with low to low-intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy with special emphasis on segmental dosimetry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 186 consecutive patients treated for early stage prostate cancer receiving definitive I-125 brachytherapy (permanent seed implantation) between November 2001 and April 2005 at our institution were examined for the development of side effects. Morbidity was assessed prospectively using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) in a mean follow-up interval of 30 months. The scores were correlated with segmental dosimetry performed 6 weeks after the implantation. RESULTS: The mean postoperative dose to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) was 180.2 Gy, the mean preoperative IPSS 7.2 and the mean IIEF-5 14.35, with all scores showing a maximum deterioration after 6 weeks with normalization after 24 months. After correlating the segmental dosimetry and the scores at different time intervals, only the baseline scores remained statistically significant in multivariate regression analysis at all time intervals (P < 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: We could not demonstrate a correlation of segmental dosimetry with induction of side effects. There is no relationship between dose exposure of partial volumes and the development of radiation-induced toxicities. The preoperative situation regarding lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile function are the most important factors for postoperative outcome.

Neoadjuvant therapy of renal cell carcinoma: a novel treatment option in the era of targeted therapy?

The study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness, toxicity and optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with organ-confined or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted agents. A literature review was carried out using Medline/Pubmed articles, as well as congress reports from the last five American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Urological Association and European Association of Urology Annual Meetings. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy is feasible and shows toxicity similar to that seen in a palliative setting. Most studies recommend an application for 2-4 months. The current data situation is best for sunitinib. Surgery can apparently be carried out the day right after discontinuing the drug. However, even sunitinib leads to only a mean 10% decrease in primary tumor size, and one-quarter to one-fifth of all patients show local tumor progression during treatment. Few patients (approximately 12%) with a vena cava tumor thrombus achieve a significant decrease in its level under neoadjuvant therapy; here too, progression is observed in a significant number of cases. Even the new targeted agents show limited effectiveness in achieving relevant remissions of the primary tumor. Furthermore, tumor progression is seen in a significant percentage of patients during neoadjuvant therapy. Thus, even today in the era of targeted agents, a neoadjuvant approach should only be made in patients with localized or locally advanced renal cell carcinoma, which primarily seem to be absolutely inaccessible by (partial) nephrectomy.

Exposure of human seminal vesicle tissue to phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors antagonizes the contraction induced by norepinephrine and increases production of cyclic nucleotides.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate further the role of phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoenzymes in the control of human seminal vesicle (SV) smooth muscle contractility, we examined the functional responses of isolated SV tissue to various PDE inhibitors. It has been suggested that the application of inhibitors of the PDE type 5 may facilitate SV smooth muscle relaxation and, subsequently, retard ejaculatory response. METHODS: Using the organ bath technique, strip preparations of human SV were exposed for 5 minutes to 1 µM of the PDE inhibitors milrinone (PDE3 inhibitor), rolipram, Ro 20-1724 (PDE4 inhibitors), and sildenafil (PDE5 inhibitor). Norepinephrine (NE, alpha agonist) was then added (0,1 µM, 1 µM, and 10 µM) and isometric responses were recorded. A contraction-response curve to NE in the absence of PDE inhibitors was also generated. Drug effects on the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (GMP) were measured by means of radioimmunometric assays. RESULTS: The contraction induced by NE was effectively antagonized by 1 µM of rolipram (83.3% inhibition), Ro 20-1724 (72.3% inhibition), sildenafil (41.6% inhibition), and milrinone (37.5% inhibition). The inhibition of force generation was paralleled by a 1.6-fold to 2.8-fold increase in tissue cyclic AMP (induced by milrinone, rolipram, Ro 20-1724), and a 12-fold rise in cyclic GMP (induced by sildenafil). CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that PDE inhibitors can counteract the contraction of human SV mediated by alpha-adrenergic receptors and enhance levels of cyclic nucleotides. This might be of importance with regard to the identification of new options for the pharmacological treatment of premature ejaculation.

Present state of target therapy for disseminated renal cell carcinoma.

Both experimental and clinical researches focusing on advanced kidney cancer have increased continuously since the successful introduction of targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Being refractory to conventional hormone therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy, renal cell carcinoma has become a model tumor for the development and evaluation of diverse novel targeted drugs. This review highlights currently available agents and summarizes evidence-based data regarding their effectiveness in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the role of debulking tumor nephrectomy followed by systemic therapy as part of an optimum treatment algorithm is being elucidated.

Sorafenib reveals efficacy in sequential treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer.

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is a highly vascularized tumor with a generally poor prognosis. It is largely resistant to conventional cancer treatment, including most schemes of hormonal and cytokine therapy as well as to modern chemotherapy. Although IFN-alpha has been the first choice in mRCC treatment strategies for more than a decade, recent recommendations of the European Association of Urology focus on so-called molecular-targeted therapies, with multikinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib and sunitinib, blocking the progression of cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis, as preferential therapy. Sorafenib targets the VEGF receptor, the PDGF receptor beta and, finally, Raf kinase, and is approved for patients who have either received cytokines or are unsuitable for such a therapy. Although targeted therapies reveal superior efficacy compared with previous cytokine-based approaches, they do not cure patients with metastatic disease. Therefore, following tumor progression, most patients require a second-line or sequential therapy during the further progress of the disease. Owing to the fact that optimal sequencing of these new agents has not been fully elucidated, some recent mainly retrospective studies compared the sequence of sorafenib and sunitinib in order to assess the best clinical benefit in mRCC patients. Apparently, no cross-resistance could be observed in any trial, and most results demonstrated a superior efficacy of a sequence strategy when sorafenib was applied as first-line treatment. Regarding current investigations, the aim of the present article is to address and critically discuss the clinical data concerning the efficacy of sorafenib as part of a sequential treatment of mRCC.

An update on the medical therapy of advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The effectiveness of multikinase inhibitors in first- and second-line therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been evaluated in various clinical studies. Initial results indicate an increased response rate and a prolonged progression-free survival compared with cytokine-containing therapeutic approaches. The new multitargeted kinase inhibitors sorafenib (Nexavar/BAY 43-9006) and sunitinib (Sutent/SUO 11248) interfere mainly with vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor pathways. Recently, temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, demonstrated activity in RCC patients with poor prognosis. This review discusses the effectiveness of the most frequently used substances for systemically progressive RCC in consideration of the currently available clinical data.

The impact of extracorporal circulation on therapy-related mortality and long-term survival of patients with renal cell cancer and intracaval neoplastic extension.

In approximately 4%-10% of patients presenting with renal cell cancer, the transluminal propagation of a tumour thrombus into the vena cava inferior or the right atrium comes to diagnosis. Recent investigations have indicated that the presence of neoplastic extension into the venous system does not reveal independent prognostic value regarding the clinical course of the disease. Although the complete surgical removal of vena cava thrombosis in patients without simultaneously occurring regional lymph node or distant metastases has become a well established treatment modality, several questions concerning this surgical strategy still remain the subject of ongoing discussions. In the present investigation that included 92 patients with renal cell cancer and intracaval neoplastic extension, it was clearly demonstrated that using cardiopulmonary bypass, deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest - preferably, during the removal of intracaval thrombosis extending into the right atrium - does not result in a substantially increased treatment-related intra- or postoperative mortality. However, in contrast to a previously reported observation, this treatment option did not reveal any substantial impact on the long-term survival of the patients following surgical therapy. Accordingly, the cranial extension of intracaval thrombosis was not identified as a biological variable of any prognostic importance for renal cell cancer patients.