Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Orthop Res ; 37(10): 2258-2263, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31115924

RESUMEN

Autologous vein wrapping is used to treat recurrent chronic constriction neuropathy and traumatic peripheral nerve injury. However, its use is restricted due to the inability to obtain sufficiently long veins for larger grafts. We previously reported that vein-derived basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) promotes heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), which reduces allodynia via its anti-inflammatory properties. To mimic vein wrapping, we developed a collagen sheet impregnated with bFGF. Chronic constriction injury (CCI) was induced in male Wistar rats as a model of sciatic nerve injury, and the rats were divided into three groups: (i) untreated after CCI surgery (control group), (ii) treated with a collagen sheet wrap impregnated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS/CS group), and (iii) treated with a collagen sheet wrap impregnated with bFGF (bFGF/CS group). Pain behavior (von Frey test) was evaluated on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 5, 7, and 14. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was conducted on sciatic nerve RNA to quantify HO-1 gene, Hmox1, expression. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to determine HO-1 protein levels on POD 1. von Frey testing showed significantly greater pain hypersensitivity in the control and PBS/CS groups than the bFGF/CS group. In the bFGF/CS group, Hmox1 messenger RNA and HO-1 protein levels were significantly increased in the sciatic nerve compared with the control and PBS/CS groups on PODs 1 and 5 and POD 1, respectively. The bFGF/CS group showed decreased allodynia and HO-1 induction, as observed with vein wrapping. Therefore, local application of bFGF may be an alternative treatment strategy for compressive neuropathy and peripheral nerve trauma in clinical settings. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2258-2263, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Factor 2 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/administración & dosificación , Hiperalgesia/terapia , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/terapia , Neuropatía Ciática/terapia , Animales , Colágeno , Portadores de Fármacos , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Hemo Oxigenasa (Desciclizante)/metabolismo , Distribución Aleatoria , Ratas , Nervio Ciático/metabolismo , Porcinos
2.
J Orthop Sci ; 15(6): 731-6, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21116889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that rat L5/6 lumbar discs are innervated mainly by L2 dorsal root ganglion neurons. We previously reported that L2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective for discogenic low back pain (DLBP) patients, although the diagnosis was based only on the results of physical examination, plain films, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate L2 spinal nerve block for DLBP patients retrospectively based on MRI findings and surgical results. METHODS: A total of 62 patients with only LBP and no accompanying radicular pain were investigated. Patients had only one level of disc degeneration on MRI. When pain was provoked during discography, we performed surgery at the next stage (40 patients). In all, 22 patients were excluded owing to negative discography results. Of the 40 patients, we evaluated 25 strictly selected patients suffering from DLBP. DLBP was diagnosed when the patient experienced pain relief at least 2 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Fifteen patients who did not show pain relief after surgery were used for the non-DLBP group. L2 spinal nerve infiltration using 1.5 ml of lidocaine was performed in all 40 patients before surgery. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score after L2 spinal nerve infiltration was recorded, and an association of L2 spinal nerve infiltration and DLBP was explored. RESULTS: Low back pain scores assessed using the VAS score, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and the Oswestry Disability Index score in the two groups were not significantly different. L 2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective for 27 patients but not effective for 13 patients; the VAS score after 15 min and 2 h improved in the DLBP group compared with that of the non-DLBP group (P < 0. 05). L2 spinal nerve infiltration was more effective in DLBP patients (21 patients, 84%) than in the non-DLBP group (6 patients, 40%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, L2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective in 84% of selected DLBP patients and is thought to be a useful tool for diagnosing DLBP. However, we should take into consideration that the L2 spinal nerve infiltration was effective in 40% of non-DLBP patients as well.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Vértebras Lumbares , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/patología , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA