A national study of postoperative thyroid hormone supplementation rates after thyroid lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: The American Thyroid Association updated guidelines in 2015 to allow lobectomy for low-risk thyroid cancers. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine thyroid hormone supplementation rates after lobectomy and (2) to evaluate the effect of the American Thyroid Association guideline change on lobectomy and hormone supplementation rates among thyroid cancer patients. METHODS: The Merative MarketScan Databases was used to identify adult (≥age 18) patients who underwent thyroidectomy for benign nodules or thyroid cancer. The association between indication for surgery and postoperative thyroid hormone supplementation was examined using χ2 analyses and multivariable logistic regression models. Among patients with thyroid cancer, lobectomy and hormone supplementation rates were compared in the periods before (2008-2015) and after the guideline change (2016-2019). RESULTS: Of the 81,926 patients identified, 33,756 (41.2%) underwent thyroid lobectomy, 45,104 (55.1%) underwent total thyroidectomy, and 3,066 (3.7%) underwent completion thyroidectomy. Patients who underwent lobectomy for malignancy were significantly more likely to require hormone supplementation (59.3% vs 39.4% [P < .001], adjusted odds ratio 2.34 [95% confidence interval 2.20-2.48]) compared to those with benign disease. Compared to the 2008 to 2015 period, the proportion of patients who underwent lobectomy for thyroid cancer was higher in the 2016 to 2019 period (34.3% vs 30.3%, P < .001), with fewer patients requiring completion thyroidectomy (25.6% vs 29.8%, P < .001) and thyroid hormone supplementation (56.9% vs 60.1%, P = .04). CONCLUSION: The postoperative thyroid hormone supplementation rate was significantly higher in patients who had thyroid cancers compared to benign diseases. After the American Thyroid Association guidelines changed, lobectomy rates increased significantly without a concomitant increase in the completion of thyroidectomy.

Risk Factors for Decreased Quality of Life in Thyroid Cancer Survivors: Initial Findings from the North American Thyroid Cancer Survivorship Study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of thyroid cancer survivors is rising rapidly due to the combination of an increasing incidence, high survival rates, and a young age at diagnosis. The physical and psychosocial morbidity of thyroid cancer has not been adequately described, and this study therefore sought to improve the understanding of the impact of thyroid cancer on quality of life (QoL) by conducting a large-scale survivorship study. METHODS: Thyroid cancer survivors were recruited from a multicenter collaborative network of clinics, national survivorship groups, and social media. Study participants completed a validated QoL assessment tool that measures four morbidity domains: physical, psychological, social, and spiritual effects. Data were also collected on participant demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor characteristics, and treatment modalities. RESULTS: A total of 1174 participants with thyroid cancer were recruited. Of these, 89.9% were female, with an average age of 48 years, and a mean time from diagnosis of five years. The mean overall QoL was 5.56/10, with 0 being the worst. Scores for each of the sub-domains were 5.83 for physical, 5.03 for psychological, 6.48 for social, and 5.16 for spiritual well-being. QoL scores begin to improve five years after diagnosis. Female sex, young age at diagnosis, and lower educational attainment were highly predictive of decreased QoL. CONCLUSION: Thyroid cancer diagnosis and treatment can result in a decreased QoL. The present findings indicate that better tools to measure and improve thyroid cancer survivor QoL are needed. The authors plan to follow-up on these findings in the near future, as enrollment and data collection are ongoing.