Physical compatibility of sulbactam/durlobactam with select intravenous drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

PURPOSE: Sulbactam/durlobactam is a combination antibiotic designed to target Acinetobacter baumannii, including carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant strains. The objective of this study was to determine the physical compatibility of sulbactam/durlobactam solution during simulated Y-site administration with 95 intravenous (IV) drugs. METHODS: Vials of sulbactam/durlobactam solution were diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride injection to a volume of 100 mL (the final concentration of both drugs was 15 mg/mL). All other IV drugs were reconstituted according to the manufacturer's recommendations and diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride injection to the upper range of concentrations used clinically or tested undiluted as intended for administration. Y-site conditions were simulated by mixing 5 mL of sulbactam/durlobactam with 5 mL of the tested drug solutions in a 1:1 ratio. Solutions were inspected for physical characteristics (clarity, color, and Tyndall effect), turbidity, and pH changes before admixture, immediately post admixture, and over 4 hours. Incompatibility was defined as any observed precipitation, significant color change, positive Tyndall test, or turbidity change of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity unit during the observation period. RESULTS: Sulbactam/durlobactam was physically compatible with 38 out of 42 antimicrobials tested (90.5%) and compatible overall with 86 of 95 drugs tested (90.5%). Incompatibility was observed with albumin, amiodarone hydrochloride, ceftaroline fosamil, ciprofloxacin, daptomycin, levofloxacin, phenytoin sodium, vecuronium, and propofol. CONCLUSION: The Y-site compatibility of sulbactam/durlobactam with 95 IV drugs was described. These compatibility data will assist pharmacists and nurses to safely coordinate administration of IV medications with sulbactam/durlobactam.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients With Augmented Renal Clearance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether established ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) dosing is adequate for patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) and bacterial infection. METHODS: ARC (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 130 mL/min) was confirmed by directly measured CrCl in 11 critically ill patients in a phase 1 pharmacokinetics study. Patients received 3 g C/T (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) as a 60-minute intravenous infusion. Pharmacokinetic sampling occurred at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the start of the infusion. Noncompartmental analyses were conducted on concentration data. The following pharmacodynamic targets were evaluated: time that free (unbound) drug concentrations exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 4 µg/mL for ceftolozane and time that the unbound concentration exceeded the 1 µg/mL target threshold (fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL) for > 20% of the dosing interval for tazobactam. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity, clearance and volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) were 236 (118) h*µg/mL, 10.4 (4.5) L/h and 30.8 (10.8) L, respectively, for ceftolozane; and 35.5 (18.5) h*µg/mL, 35.3 (16.5) L/h and 54.8 (20.1) L, respectively, for tazobactam. Clearance and Vss were higher for both ceftolozane and tazobactam in patients with ARC compared with healthy individuals. The mean estimated ceftolozane fT>MIC at 4 µg/mL was 86.4%; the mean estimated tazobactam fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL was 54.9%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ARC, a 3 g C/T dose met respective pharmacodynamic targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02387372.

Unresolved issues in the identification and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative organisms.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacterales, are a threat worldwide. This review will cover mechanisms of resistance within CROs and challenges with identification and treatment of these organisms while pointing out unresolved issues and ongoing challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: The treatment of CROs has expanded through newer therapeutic options. Guided utilization through genotypic and phenotypic testing is necessary in order for these drugs to target the appropriate mechanisms of resistance and select optimal antibiotic therapy. SUMMARY: Identification methods and treatment options need to be precisely understood in order to limit the spread and maximize outcomes of CRO infections.

Pharmacokinetics of Telavancin in Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis during Acute Pulmonary Exacerbation.

Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) frequently harbor Staphylococcus aureus, which is increasingly antibiotic resistant. Telavancin is a once-daily rapidly bactericidal antibiotic active against methicillin-, linezolid-, and ceftaroline-resistant S. aureus Because CF patients experience alterations in pharmacokinetics, the optimal dose of telavancin in this population is unknown. Adult CF patients (n = 18) admitted for exacerbations received 3 doses of telavancin 7.5 mg/kg of body weight (first 6 patients) or 10 mg/kg (final 12 patients) every 24 h (q24h). Population pharmacokinetic models with and without covariates were fitted using the nonparametric adaptive grid algorithm in Pmetrics. The final model was used to perform 5,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations for multiple telavancin doses. The best fit was a 2-compartment model describing the volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vc ) as a multiple of total body weight (TBW) and the volume of distribution of the central compartment scaled to total body weight (Vθ) normalized by the median observed value (Vc = Vθ × TBW/52.1) and total body clearance (CL) as a linear function of creatinine clearance (CRCL) (CL = CLNR + CLθ × CRCL), where CLNR represents nonrenal clearance and CLθ represents the slope term on CRCL to estimate renal clearance. The mean population parameters were as follows: Vθ, 4.92 ± 0.76 liters · kg-1; CLNR, 0.59 ± 0.30 liters · h-1; CLθ, 5.97 × 10-3 ± 1.24 × 10-3; Vp (volume of the peripheral compartment), 3.77 ± 1.41 liters; Q (intercompartmental clearance), 4.08 ± 2.17 liters · h-1 The free area under the concentration-time curve (fAUC) values for 7.5 and 10 mg/kg were 30 ± 4.6 and 52 ± 12 mg · h/liter, respectively. Doses of 7.5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg achieved 76.5% and 100% probability of target attainment (PTA) at a fAUC/MIC threshold of >215, respectively, for MIC of ≤0.12 mg/liter. The probabilities of reaching the acute kidney injury (AKI) threshold AUC (763 mg · h · liter-1) for these doses were 0% and 0.96%, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. Telavancin 10 mg/kg yielded optimal PTA and minimal risk of AKI, suggesting that this FDA-approved dose is appropriate to treat acute pulmonary exacerbations in CF adults. (The clinical trial discussed in this study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03172793.).

Assessment of the Physical Compatibility of Eravacycline and Common Parenteral Drugs During Simulated Y-site Administration.

PURPOSE: Eravacycline is a broad-spectrum, intravenous fluorocycline antibiotic approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults. A 60-minute infusion is recommended for each infused dose. Compatibility data that may allow convenient Y-site administration of eravacycline with other parenteral medications are unavailable. We aimed to determine the physical compatibility of eravacycline with other intravenous medications by simulated Y-site administration. METHODS: Eravacycline was reconstituted according to published prescribing information and diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride to a concentration of 0.6 mg/mL. Simulated Y-site administration was performed by mixing 5 mL of eravacycline with an equal volume of 51 other intravenous medications, including crystalloid and carbohydrate hydration fluids and 20 antimicrobials. Secondary medications were assessed at the upper range of concentrations considered standard for intravenous infusion. Mixtures underwent visual inspection and turbidity measurement immediately on mixture and at 3 subsequent time points (30, 60, and 120 minutes after admixture), and pH was measured at 60 minutes for comparison with the baseline value of the secondary medication. FINDINGS: Eravacycline was physically compatible with 41 parenteral drugs (80%) by simulated Y-site administration. Incompatibility was observed with albumin, amiodarone hydrochloride, ceftaroline fosamil, colistimethate sodium, furosemide, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, micafungin sodium, propofol, and sodium bicarbonate. IMPLICATIONS: Eravacycline for injection was physically compatible with most parenteral medications assessed. Pharmacists and nurses should be knowledgeable of the observed incompatibilities with eravacycline to prevent the unintentional mixing of incompatible intravenous medications.

Pharmacodynamics of daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of enterococcal bacteraemia.

Daptomycin is commonly prescribed in combination with other antibiotics for treatment of enterococcal bacteraemia. Whilst a free drug area under the concentration-time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC) ratio >27.4 is associated with 30-day survival with daptomycin monotherapy, it is unknown whether receipt of other antibiotics affects this threshold. Data were pooled from seven published trials assessing outcomes in daptomycin-treated enterococcal bacteraemia, including patients receiving daptomycin (≥72 h) and any ß-lactam, intravenous aminoglycoside, linezolid, tigecycline and/or vancomycin. Exposures were calculated using a published population pharmacokinetic model based on creatinine clearance, 90% protein binding and daptomycin Etest MIC. The fAUC/MIC threshold predictive of 30-day survival was determined by classification and regression tree analysis. Following pooling of data, 240 adults were included; 137 (57.1%) were alive at 30 days. A majority of patients were immunosuppressed (65.8%) and received a ß-lactam (94.6%). Examining the threshold in low-acuity patients (n = 135) to control for co-morbidities, these patients were more likely to survive when fAUC/MIC >12.3 was achieved (63.2% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.015). The difference remained significant in a multivariable logistic regression model that controlled for infection source and immunosuppression (P = 0.017). This threshold is 2-fold lower than that observed with daptomycin monotherapy. Probabilities of threshold attainment using a 10 mg/kg/day dose were 100% for isolates with MICs ≤ 2 mg/L and 95.2% for a 12 mg/kg/day dose for MICs of 4 mg/L. These data support the use of high-dose daptomycin in combination with another antibiotic for treatment of enterococcal bacteraemia.

Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Daptomycin-treated Enterococcal Bacteremia: It Is Time to Change the Breakpoint.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is debate over whether the daptomycin susceptibility breakpoint for enterococci (ie, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤4 mg/L) is appropriate. In bacteremia, observational data support prescription of high doses (>8 mg/kg). However, pharmacodynamic targets associated with positive patient outcomes are undefined. METHODS: Data were pooled from observational studies that assessed outcomes in daptomycin-treated enterococcal bacteremia. Patients who received an additional antienterococcal antibiotic and/or a ß-lactam antibiotic at any time during treatment were excluded. Daptomycin exposures were calculated using a published population pharmacokinetic model. The free drug area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (fAUC/MIC) threshold predictive of survival at 30 days was identified by classification and regression tree analysis and confirmed with multivariable logistic regression. Monte Carlo simulations determined the probability of target attainment (PTA) at clinically relevant MICs. RESULTS: Of 114 patients who received daptomycin monotherapy, 67 (58.8%) were alive at 30 days. A fAUC/MIC >27.43 was associated with survival in low-acuity (n = 77) patients (68.9 vs 37.5%, P = .006), which remained significant after adjusting for infection source and immunosuppression (P = .026). The PTA for a 6-mg/kg/day (every 24 hours) dose was 1.5%-5.5% when the MIC was 4 mg/L (ie, daptomycin-susceptible) and 91.0%-97.9% when the MIC was 1 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: For enterococcal bacteremia, a daptomycin fAUC/MIC >27.43 was associated with 30-day survival among low-acuity patients. As pharmacodynamics for the approved dose are optimized only when MIC ≤1 mg/L, these data continue to stress the importance of reevaluation of the susceptibility breakpoint.

Physical compatibility of plazomicin with select i.v. drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

PURPOSE: The results of a study to determine the physical compatibility of plazomicin sulfate solution during simulated Y-site administration with 92 i.v. drugs are reported. METHODS: Plazomicin injection solution (500 mg/10 mL) was diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose for injection to a final volume of 50 mL (final plazomicin concentration, 24 mg/mL), consistent with a 15-mg/kg dose administered to an 80-kg patient (i.e., 1,200 mg). All other i.v. drugs were reconstituted according to manufacturers' recommendations and diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose for injection to the upper range of concentrations used clinically. Y-site conditions were simulated by mixing 5 mL of plazomicin solution with 5 mL of tested drug solutions in a 1:1 ratio. Solutions were assessed for visual (via color and Tyndall beam testing), turbidity (using a laboratory-grade turbidimeter), and pH changes over a 60-minute observation period. Incompatibility was defined a priori as precipitation, color change, a positive Tyndall test, or a turbidity change of ≥0.5 nephelometric turbidity units at any time during the 60-minute observation period. RESULTS: Plazomicin was physically compatible with 79 of the 92 drugs tested. Determinations of physical incompatibility with plazomicin were made for 13 drugs: albumin, amiodarone, amphotericin B deoxycholate, anidulafungin, calcium chloride, daptomycin, esomeprazole, heparin, levofloxacin, methylprednisolone, micafungin, phenytoin, and propofol, CONCLUSION: Plazomicin at a concentration of 24 mg/mL was physically compatible with 85% of the drugs tested, including 31 of 36 antimicrobial agents.

Antibacterial Activity of Human Simulated Epithelial Lining Fluid Concentrations of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Alone or in Combination with Amikacin Inhale (BAY41-6551) against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

The role of inhalational combination therapy when treating carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae with newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors has not been established. Using a 72-h in vitro pharmacodynamic chemostat model, we simulated the human exposures achieved in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) following intravenous treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) 2.5 g every 8 h (q8h) alone and in combination with inhaled amikacin (AMK-I) 400 mg q12h, a reformulated aminoglycoside designed for inhalational administration, against three P. aeruginosa isolates (CZA [ceftazidime/avibactam] MICs, 4/4 to 8/4 µg/ml; AMK-I MICs, 8 to 64 µg/ml) and three K. pneumoniae isolates (CZA MICs, 1/4 to 8/4 µg/ml; AMK-I MICs, 32 to 64 µg/ml). Combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in 72-h CFU compared with that of CZA monotherapy against two of three P. aeruginosa isolates (-4.14 log10 CFU/ml, P = 0.027; -1.42 log10 CFU/ml, P = 0.020; and -0.4 log10 CFU/ml, P = 0.298) and two of three K. pneumoniae isolates (0.04 log10 CFU/ml, P = 0.963; -4.34 log10 CFU/ml, P < 0.001; and -2.34 log10 CFU/ml, P = 0.021). When measured by the area under the bacterial growth curve (AUBC) over 72 h, significant reductions were observed in favor of the combination regimen against all six isolates tested. AMK-I combination therapy successfully suppressed CZA resistance development in one K. pneumoniae isolate harboring blaKPC-3 that was observed during CZA monotherapy. These studies suggest a beneficial role for combination therapy with intravenous CZA and inhaled AMK when treating pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Physical Compatibility of Meropenem and Vaborbactam With Select Intravenous Drugs During Simulated Y-site Administration.

PURPOSE: Meropenem/vaborbactam is a novel intravenous antibiotic combining the carbapenem, meropenem, with a novel ß-lactamase inhibitor, vaborbactam. Meropenem/vaborbactam is administered as a 3-hour infusion given every 8 hours, thereby potentially restricting an intravenous line for 9 h/d. Intravenous medications may be given concurrently via Y-site when compatibility data are available. Herein, physical compatibility was determined for the identification which medications can be coadministered with meropenem/vaborbactam via Y-site. METHODS: Y-site administration was simulated in vitro by admixing 5 mL of meropenem 8 mg/mL and vaborbactam 8 mg/mL with an equal volume of 88 other diluted intravenous medications, including 34 antimicrobials. All other medications were diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride to the upper range of concentrations considered standard for intravenous infusion. Visual inspection, turbidity measurement, and pH measurement were performed prior to admixture, directly after admixture, and at time points up to 3 hours after admixture. FINDINGS: Of the 88 medications tested, meropenem/vaborbactam was compatible with 73 (83%), including many antibiotics such as aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin), colistin, fosfomycin, linezolid, tedizolid, tigecycline, and vancomycin. Physical incompatibility was observed with albumin, amiodarone, anidulafungin, calcium chloride, caspofungin, ceftaroline, ciprofloxacin, daptomycin, diphenhydramine, dobutamine, isavuconazole, midazolam, nicardipine, ondansetron, and phenytoin. IMPLICATIONS: The majority of intravenous medications tested were found to be physically compatible with meropenem/vaborbactam. These data will help pharmacists and nurses to improve line access in patients receiving meropenem/vaborbactam.

Physical compatibility of fosfomycin for injection with select i.v. drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

PURPOSE: The results of a study to determine the physical compatibility of ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) in 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose during simulated Y-site administration with 37 i.v. antimicrobials and 58 nonantimicrobials are reported. METHODS: Fosfomycin, an epoxide antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria, is marketed in the United States only in an oral formulation with limited bioavailability, but an i.v. formulation is in development. Fosfomycin for injection and other evaluated drugs were reconstituted according to manufacturer recommendations and further diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose to the final desired concentrations. Y-site administration was simulated in glass culture tubes. Incompatibility was defined as changes in visual characteristics or a change in turbidity of >0.5 nephelometric turbidity units over the 120-minute observation period. RESULTS: Of the 95 drugs tested, 16 were incompatible with fosfomycin in 0.9% sodium chloride, and 18 were incompatible with fosfomycin in 5% dextrose; incompatibility was observed with 10 of 37 antimicrobials, including the 3 commercially available amphotericin B products, anidulafungin, caspofungin, ceftaroline, ciprofloxacin, daptomycin, doxycycline, and isavuconazonium sulfate. CONCLUSION: Fosfomycin for injection at a concentration of 30 mg/mL was physically compatible with 73 of 95 (77%) of the i.v. drugs tested at concentrations used clinically in both 0.9% sodium chloride injection and 5% dextrose injection. Twenty-two drugs were deemed incompatible in at least 1 of the 2 diluents.

Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Strategies for the Treatment of Gram-negative Infections in the Era of Resistance.

Gram-negative organisms are an increasing source of concern within the healthcare setting due to their common presence as a cause of infection and emerging resistance to current therapies. However, current antimicrobial dosing recommendations may be insufficient for the treatment of gram-negative infections. Applying knowledge of an antibiotic's pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile when designing a dosing regimen leads to a greater likelihood of achieving optimal exposure, including against gram-negative pathogens with higher MICs. Additionally, administering antibiotics directly to the site of infection, such as via aerosolization for pneumonia, is another method to achieve optimized drug exposure at the site of infection. Incorporating these treatment strategies into clinical practice will assist antimicrobial stewardship programs in successfully treating gram-negative infections.

Clinical pharmacodynamics of antipseudomonal cephalosporins in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Advanced-generation cephalosporins are frequently used for empirical coverage of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to their activity against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae. Providing optimal antibiotic exposure is essential to achieving successful response in patients with VAP. We evaluated exposures of two antipseudomonal cephalosporins, ceftazidime and cefepime, in patients with VAP due to Gram-negative bacilli to identify the pharmacodynamic parameter predictive of microbiological success. Population pharmacokinetic models were used to estimate individual free drug exposures. Pharmacodynamic indices were determined for each patient using the baseline Gram-negative bacilli with the highest drug MIC. Classification and regression tree analysis was utilized to partition exposure breakpoints, and multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of microbiological success. A total of 73 patients (18 receiving ceftazidime therapy and 55 receiving cefepime therapy) were included. MICs ranged widely from 0.047 to 96 µg/ml. The microbiological success rate was 58.9%. Predictive breakpoints were identified for all pharmacodynamic parameters, including a serum fT>MIC greater than 53% (P=0.02). When controlling for APACHE II (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.93 to 1.09; P=0.85) and combination therapy (OR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 2.19; P=0.59), achieving a greater than 53% fT>MIC remained a significant predictor of success (OR, 10.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 92.3; P=0.04). In patients with VAP due to Gram-negative bacilli, serum exposure of greater than 53% fT>MIC was found to be a significant predictor of favorable microbiological response for antipseudomonal cephalosporins. These data are useful when determining dosing regimens for cephalosporin agents under development for pneumonia.

Linezolid penetration into wound tissue of two diabetic patients before and after hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We describe linezolid tissue penetration in two diabetic patients with lower-extremity ulcers, measured by in vivo microdialysis, before and after hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy. METHODS: Each diabetic patient received a single orally administered dose of linezolid 600 mg within one week of initiating an eight-week HBO2 course for treatment of his or her Wagner Grade 3 lower-extremity wound. A microdialysis catheter was placed at the margin of the wound for collection of extracellular tissue fluid. Blood and tissue samples were collected hourly over the following 12 hours. After completion of HBO2, each patient received a second dose of linezolid 600 mg, the microdialysis catheter was reinserted in same location, and blood/tissue samples were recollected for comparison. RESULTS: Patient 1 completed all eight weeks of HBO2, while Patient 2 completed only five of eight weeks. Based on the 12-hour area under the curve ratio between extracellular tissue fluid and blood, linezolid penetration was 0.474 and 0.479 for Patients 1 and 2, respectively, at the beginning of HBO2. After completing HBO2, penetration improved in both patients to 0.950 and 0.757, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tissue concentrations of linezolid at the site of lower extremity ulcers improved following a course of HBO2 in two patients with diabetes.

Comparative efficacies of human simulated exposures of telavancin and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a range of vancomycin MICs in a murine pneumonia model.

Telavancin displays potent in vitro and in vivo activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), including strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. We compared the efficacies of telavancin and vancomycin against MRSA strains with vancomycin MICs of ≥1 µg/ml in a neutropenic murine lung infection model. Thirteen clinical MRSA isolates (7 vancomycin-susceptible, 2 vancomycin-heteroresistant [hVISA], and 4 vancomycin-intermediate [VISA] isolates) were tested after 24 h, and 7 isolates (1 hVISA and 4 VISA isolates) were tested after 48 h of exposure. Mice were administered subcutaneous doses of telavancin at 40 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h (q12h) or of vancomycin at 110 mg/kg q12h; doses were designed to simulate the area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound fraction of drug (fAUC) observed for humans given telavancin at 10 mg/kg q24h or vancomycin at 1 g q12h. Efficacy was expressed as the 24- or 48-h change in lung bacterial density from pretreatment counts. At dose initiation, the mean bacterial load was 6.16 ± 0.26 log(10) CFU/ml, which increased by averages of 1.26 ± 0.55 and 1.74 ± 0.68 log in untreated mice after 24 and 48 h, respectively. At both time points, similar CFU reductions were noted for telavancin and vancomycin against MRSA, with vancomycin MICs of ≤2 µg/ml. Both drugs were similarly efficacious after 24 and 48 h of treatment against the hVISA strains tested. Against VISA isolates, telavancin reduced bacterial burdens significantly more than vancomycin for 1 of 4 isolates after 24 h and for 3 of 4 isolates after 48 h. These data support the potential utility of telavancin for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia caused by pathogens with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

Tackling empirical antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in your ICU: guidance for implementing the guidelines.

Guidelines published jointly by the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America endorse the practice of appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and even provide recommendations for specific antibiotics based on whether a patient has risk factors for multidrug-resistant infections. Unfortunately, the current guidelines provide little insight into how a specific institution can best develop a strategy for providing empirical antibiotic therapy. This review article focuses on important steps that should be taken in developing a hospital-specific pathway for the empirical antibiotic treatment of VAP. Consideration should be given to developing a multidisciplinary group to obtain intensive care unit (ICU)-specific antibiograms for the most common causative organisms, real-time minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data or MIC distributions from surveillance studies over a representable time frame, and implementing empirical dosage strategies aimed at achieving not only appropriate therapy but also optimal therapy based on pharmacodynamic targets. A proper deescalation strategy will also be vital to managing antibiotic choices and dosages, as well as providing useful recommendations for discontinuation of therapy. Finally, continued feedback of program results is critical to maintaining compliance as well as for reevaluating empirical antibiotic choices.

Probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment with standard and prolonged-infusion antibiotic regimens for empiric therapy in adults with hospital-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacodynamic characteristics of antibiotics should be considered when choosing empiric dosage regimens for the treatment of pneumonia. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the probabilities of achieving requisite pharmacodynamic exposure (ie, f T > MIC, AUC/MIC) for antibiotics given for the empiric treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) as recommended by the 2005 guidelines of the American Thoracic Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. METHODS: In a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation, pharmacodynamic analyses were performed for standard doses of cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Prolonged 3-hour infusion regimens were also evaluated for anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams. MIC data were incorporated from the 2007 Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection, a national surveillance study. The weighted cumulative fraction of response (wCFR) against common pneumonia pathogens was determined for each regimen. A second scenario was conducted by altering the pathogen prevalence to assess wCFR for late-onset pneumonia (ie, HAP in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation). Optimal wCFR was defined a priori as >or=90%. RESULTS: Among the 0.5-hour infusions, cefepime, ceftazidime, and meropenem had the highest wCFRs (>or=90%) against pathogens that cause HAP (cefepime, 1 g q8h, 92.8%; 2 g q8h, 97.2%; 2 g q12h, 94.3%; ceftazidime, 2 g q8h, 93.2%; meropenem, 1 g q8h, 90.9%; 2 g q8h, 93.9%). Imipenem (500 mg q6h, 85.5%; 1 g q8h, 88.1%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g q6h, 80.5%) as 0.5-hour infusions were nearly optimal, whereas ceftriaxone, ertapenem, and the fluoroquinolones had the lowest wCFR values. All regimens showed lower wCFRs for late-onset pneumonia than for HAP. Optimal wCFRs were found only with prolonged (3-hour) infusions of 2 g q8h for ceftazidime (94.5%) and meropenem (90.1%), whereas cefepime 2 g q8h achieved optimal wCFR with both a 0.5-hour infusion (93.1%) and a 3-hour infusion (95.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this model suggest that standard doses of most antipseudomonal beta-lactams (cefepime, ceftazidime, and meropenem) had high probabilities of achieving optimal pharmacodynamic exposure as empiric therapy for HAP, whereas the low probabilities predicted from ceftriaxone, ertapenem, and the fluoroquinolones suggest that these agents would be inappropriate as monotherapy. For late-onset HAP, prolonged infusions of cefepime, ceftazidime, and meropenem offered the highest probabilities of achieving bactericidal exposure.

Probability of achieving requisite pharmacodynamic exposure for oral beta-lactam regimens against Haemophilus influenzae in children.

OBJECTIVE: To define contemporary levels of resistance of Haemophilus influenzae to antibacterials commonly used to treat children for bacterial respiratory infections, and to assess the probability of achieving the requisite pharmacodynamic exposures for regimens against recent respiratory H. influenzae isolates using Monte Carlo simulation. METHODS: 233 H. influenzae isolates obtained from pediatric outpatients with acute otitis media (n = 55), sinusitis (n = 58), or lower respiratory tract infections ( n = 120) from 1 November 2004 to 30 April 2005 were characterized for beta-lactamase production and susceptibility to a panel of 10 beta-lactam antimicrobials. 5000 concentration-time profiles were simulated for US FDA-approved doses of oral amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, ceftibuten, and cefuroxime using pharmacokinetics and weights of 5-year old male children. The probability of attaining free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 50% of the dosing interval (50% fT > MIC) was assessed for each regimen against this population of H. influenzae. RESULTS: beta-Lactamase production was demonstrated in 67 (28.8%) of the H. influenzae isolates and varied by isolation site (38% acute otitis media, 36% sinusitis, and 21% lower respiratory tract infections). Regarding susceptibility, the rank order of the tested antimicrobials was ceftriaxone = cefixime (100%) > cefpodoxime (99.6%) > ceftibuten = amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (99.1%) > cefdinir (98.7%) > cefuroxime (97.4%) > cefprozil (93.1%) > cefaclor (92.3%) > amoxicillin (63.1%). The most active agents based on pharmacodynamic assessment (50% fT > MIC) were cefpodoxime (98.9%), ceftibuten (95.3%), and high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (90.4%). Several amoxicillin regimens also achieved a high likelihood of pharmacodynamic target attainment (91.8- 98.6%) when beta-lactamase-positive strains were excluded from the analysis. CONCLUSION: Against H. influenzae, the antibacterials most likely to achieve optimal in vivo exposures in children are cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.

Pharmacodynamic target attainment of oral beta-lactams for the empiric treatment of acute otitis media in children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the probability of oral beta-lactam regimens achieving bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposure against pathogens causing acute otitis media (AOM) given contemporary prevalence and resistance rates. METHODS: A 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation was used to recreate steady-state concentration-time profiles for oral drug administration regimens of amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, ceftibuten, and cefuroxime in a population of 12.5-month-old children. The percent of simulated children in whom free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for 50% of the drug administration interval (50% fT>MIC) were achieved was determined; 180 middle ear fluid isolates (56 Haemophilus influenzae and 124 Streptococcus pneumoniae) collected during the 2004 Global Respiratory Antimicrobial Surveillance Project (GRASP) were used. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated and weighted against the prevalence of organisms causing AOM extrapolated from the literature. The contribution of a 'Pollyanna phenomenon' for each organism was also incorporated to estimate clinical effectiveness. RESULTS: Against S. pneumoniae isolates, amoxicillin 30 mg/kg every 8 hours (84.7%) achieved the greatest CFR followed by amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and the other amoxicillin-based regimens. Against H. influenzae isolates, cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid each achieved a CFR of >90%. When weighted by the prevalence of AOM-causing pathogens, CFR was highest for cefpodoxime (87.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (85.7%), and amoxicillin 30 mg/kg every 8 hours (70.8%). The contribution of a 'Pollyanna phenomenon' increased the probability of clinical effectiveness for all agents, with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (90.2%) and cefpodoxime (90.1%) having the highest weighted CFR. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the recent epidemiologic and resistance profiles of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (45 mg/kg every 12 hours) and cefpodoxime (5 mg/kg every 12 hours) provide the greatest likelihood of achieving optimal pharmacodynamic exposures empirically in children with AOM.

Optimal dosing of piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: prolonged or continuous infusion?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional intermittent dosing regimens of piperacillin-tazobactam with prolonged and continuous infusions to determine the optimal dosing scheme against a local Pseudomonas aeruginosa population. DESIGN: Pharmacodynamic Monte Carlo simulation model. DATA SOURCE: Microbiologic data from 470 consecutive non duplicate P. aeruginosa isolates collected from a single institution over 6 months in 2006. PATIENTS: Five thousand simulated surgical patients and patients with neutropenia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We simulated serum concentration-time profiles at steady state for several piperacillin-tazobactam dosing regimens, including intermittent, prolonged, and continuous infusions. The probability of achieving 50% free time above the MIC against 470 P. aeruginosa isolates was calculated. The cumulative fractions of response for the intermittent-infusion regimens were 74.7% (3.375 g every 6 hrs), 79.9% (4.5 g every 6 hrs), and 85.6% (3.375 g every 4 hrs). For prolonged infusion regimens, the cumulative fractions of response were 83.3% (3.375 g every 8 hrs, 4-hr infusion), 87.1% (4.5 g every 8 hrs, 4-hr infusion), and 89.6% (4.5 g every 6 hrs, 3-hr infusion). For continuous-infusion regimens, the cumulative fractions of response were 82.3% (10.125 g), 86.5% (13.5 g), 89.2% (18 g), 90.0% (20.25 g), and 90.6% (22.5 g). CONCLUSION: Both prolonged- and continuous-infusion strategies improved the pharmacodynamics of piperacillin-tazobactam over those of traditional 30-minute intermittent-infusion regimens. Prolonged- and continuous infusion regimens that contained the same daily doses of piperacillin had similar likelihoods of bactericidal exposure. Thus, the selection of dosing strategy depends on the availability of intravenous access versus the convenience of once-daily administration.