Assessment of Quality of Life and Safety in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Letrozole as an Early Adjuvant Treatment / 한국유방암학회지

PURPOSE: There are few reports from Asian countries about the long-term results of aromatase inhibitor adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. This observational study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of letrozole in postmenopausal Korean women with operable breast cancer. METHODS: Self-reported quality of life (QoL) scores were serially assessed for 3 years during adjuvant letrozole treatment using the Korean version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast questionnaires (version 3). Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and serum cholesterol levels were also examined. RESULTS: All 897 patients received the documented informed consent form and completed a baseline questionnaire before treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 684 (76.3%) subjects, and 410 (45.7%) and 396 (44.1%) patients had stage I and II breast cancer, respectively. Each patient completed questionnaires at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after enrollment. Of 897 patients, 749 (83.5%) completed the study. The dropout rate was 16.5%. The serial trial outcome index, the sum of the physical and functional well-being subscales, increased gradually and significantly from baseline during letrozole treatment (p<0.001). The mean serum cholesterol level increased significantly from 199 to 205 after 36 months (p=0.042). The mean BMD significantly decreased from −0.39 at baseline to −0.87 after 36 months (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: QoL gradually improved during letrozole treatment. BMD and serum cholesterol level changes were similar to those in Western countries, indicating that adjuvant letrozole treatment is well tolerated in Korean women, with minimal ethnic variation.

Direct Comparison of PHS(R) and Perfix(R) Herniorrhaphy under Local Anesthesia

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of local anesthesia in tension-free herniorrhaphy, using prosthetic mesh, and to directly compare PHS(R) and Perfix(R) herniorrhaphy under local anesthesia. METHODS: Patients with a groin hernia, who underwent tension-free herniorrhaphy (n = 107) under local anesthesia between March 2003 and February 2006, were included. PHS(R) (n = 63) and Perfix(R) (n = 44) meshes were randomly used, with no difference between the PHS(R) and Perfix(R) groups in relation to mean age, gender, number of combined diseases, body mass index (BMI), recurred hernia and types of hernia. RESULTS: Intraoperative analgesics and/or sedatives were used in 55 patients (51.4 %) where local anesthesia was insufficient. In a univariate analysis, the additional use of intraoperative analgesics and/or sedatives was related to the patient's age and BMI. The patients at an older age and with a lower BMI were more tolerant to local anesthesia. However, only the BMI was found to be a statistically significant factor from the multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference between the PHS(R) and Perfix(R) groups on the additional use of intraoperative analgesics and/or sedatives, the use of postoperative analgesics, length of hospital stay, complication and recurrence (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: With tension-free herniorrhaphy using the PHS(R) or Perfix(R) mesh, local anesthesia was acceptable and securable, regardless of the mesh type used. Among these patients, those at an older age and with a lower BMI were more tolerant to local anesthesia.