Antigenic relationships between chloroplast and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatases.

Cytosolic fructose-1,6-biphosphatases (FBPase, EC 3.1.3.11) from pea (Pisum sativum L. cv Lincoln) and spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv Winter Giant) did not cross-react by double immunodiffusion and western blotting with either of the antisera raised against the chloroplast enzyme of both species; similarly, pea and spinach chloroplast FBPases did not react with the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. On the other hand, spinach and pea chloroplast FBPases showed strong cross-reactions against the antisera to chloroplast FBPases, in the same way that the pea and spinach cytosolic enzymes displayed good cross-reactions against the antiserum to spinach cytosolic FBPase. Crude extracts from spinach and pea leaves, as well as the corresponding purified chloroplast enzymes, showed by western blotting only one band (44 and 43 kD, respectively) in reaction with either of the antisera against the chloroplast enzymes. A unique fraction of molecular mass 38 kD appeared when either of the crude extracts or the purified spinach cytosolic FBPase were analyzed against the spinach cytosolic FBPase antiserum. These molecular sizes are in accordance with those reported for the subunits of the photosynthetic and gluconeogenic FBPases. Chloroplast and cytosolic FBPases underwent increasing inactivation when increasing concentrations of chloroplast or cytosolic anti-FBPase immunoglobulin G (IgG), respectively, were added to the reaction mixture. However, inactivations were not observed when the photosynthetic enzyme was incubated with the IgG to cytosolic FBPase, or vice versa. Quantitative results obtained by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) showed 77% common antigenic determinants between the two chloroplast enzymes when tested against the spinach photosynthetic FBPase antiserum, which shifted to 64% when assayed against the pea antiserum. In contrast, common antigenic determinats between the spinach cytosolic FBPase and the two chloroplast enzymes were less than 10% when the ELISA test was carried out with either of the photosynthetic FBPase antisera, and only 5% when the assay was performed with the antiserum to the spinach cytosolic FBPase. These results were supported by sequencing data: the deduced amino acid sequence of a chloroplast FBPase clone isolated from a pea cDNA library indicated a 39,253 molecular weight protein, with a homology of 85% with the spinach chloroplast FBPase but only 48.5% with the cytosolic enzyme from spinach.

Cloning, structure and expression of a pea cDNA clone coding for a photosynthetic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase with some features different from those of the leaf chloroplast enzyme.

A positive clone against pea (Pisum sativum L.) chloroplast fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase; EC 3.1.3.11) antibodies was obtained from a copy DNA (cDNA) library in lambda gt11. The insert was 1261 nucleotides long, and had an open reading frame of 1143 base pairs with coding capability for the whole FBPase subunit and a fragment of a putative processing peptide. An additional 115 base pairs corresponding to a 3'-untranslated region coding for an mRNA poly(A)+ tail were also found in the clone. The deduced sequence for the FBPase subunit was a 357-amino-acid protein of molecular mass 39,253 daltons (Da), showing 82-88% absolute homology with four chloroplastic FBPases sequenced earlier. The 3.1-kilobase (kb) KpnI-SacI fragment of the lambda gt11 derivative was subcloned between the KpnI-SacI restriction sites of pTZ18R to yield plasmid pAMC100. Lysates of Escherichia coli (pAMC100) showed FBPase activity; this was purified as a 170-kDa protein which, upon sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, displayed a 44-kDa band. As occurs with native FBPases, this indicates a homotetrameric structure for the expressed FBPase. When assayed under excess Mg2+ (10 mM), the expressed enzyme had a higher affinity for the substrate than the native pea leaf FBPase; this parameter appears to be substantiated by a tenfold higher specific activity than that of the native enzyme. However, when activated with dithiothreitol plus saturating concentrations of pea thioredoxin (Td) f, both FBPase had similar activities, with a 4:1 Td f-FBPase stoichiometry. In contrast to the native pea chloroplast FBPase, the E. coli-expressed enzyme did not react with the monoclonal antibody GR-PB5.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)