Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 57(6): 749-53, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23281590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced nausea and vomiting, both post-operatively and following chemotherapy, is often distressing for the patients. Our clinical impression is that certain patients are not prone to but instead protected against both post-operative and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). If support for this hypothesis could be generated, it might be easier to identify such patients as low-risk patients and judge all other patients as high-risk patients by default. METHODS: All patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden during 1 year (March 2003-March 2004) were asked to participate in this prospective, observational study. A number of women went on to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Post-operatively, patients were assessed for 24 h with regard to the occurrence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). CINV was assessed for 5 days after start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 275 women were included, 33% were classified as PONV and 67% as non-PONV. Sixty-one of the 275 women included were later subjected to adjuvant chemotherapy. In the non-PONV group, 95% of the patients did not experience CINV, whereas the association between PONV and subsequent CINV was only 38%. CONCLUSIONS: A substantially stronger interrelationship was found between non-PONV and non-CINV than between both PONV and CINV. This may suggest that certain patients, instead of being prone to nausea and vomiting, in fact in some way are protected against these unpleasant side effects.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Náusea/fisiopatología , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/fisiopatología , Vómitos/fisiopatología , Adulto , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Betametasona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Resistencia a la Enfermedad , Droperidol/uso terapéutico , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Granisetrón/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Mastectomía , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Metoclopramida/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Biológicos , Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Náusea/tratamiento farmacológico , Náusea/etiología , Náusea/prevención & control , Ondansetrón/uso terapéutico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/tratamiento farmacológico , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico , Vómitos/etiología , Vómitos/prevención & control
3.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 15(5): 559-68, 2000 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11126507

RESUMEN

Sixty elderly patients scheduled for surgical hip fracture repair were given the choice of either general isoflurane anaesthesia (n = 30) or a nerve stimulator guided combined sciatic-paravertebral nerve block (n = 30). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension and the need for postoperative admission to the intensive care unit/high dependency unit (ICU/HDU) within 48 hours postoperatively were recorded. No differences in patient characteristics, ASA class or concomitant disease status were detected between the two study groups. Both the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (0/30 vs. 11/30, p < 0.001) and the postoperative need for ICU/HDU admission (0/30 vs. 11/30, p < 0.001) was significantly reduced in patients treated with a combined sciatic-paravertebral nerve block compared to patient receiving general anaesthesia. The length of hospital stay was also found to be shorter for patient in the regional anaesthesia group [mean 6.7 days (SD 2.3) vs. 13.6 days (SD 6.1)]. The described technique appears to be an attractive alternative method to handle proximal fractures of the femur in the elderly, especially in a situation with limited ICU/HDU availability.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Bloqueo Nervioso , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA