Emergence of a dalbavancin induced glycopeptide/lipoglycopeptide non-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus during treatment of a cardiac device-related endocarditis.

In the present study, we demonstrated the emergence of dalbavancin non-susceptible and teicoplanin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants which were selected in vivo through long-term treatment with dalbavancin. A 36-year-old man presented with a cardiac device-related S. aureus endocarditis and received long-term therapy with dalbavancin. Consecutively, two glycopeptide/lipoglycopeptide susceptible and two non-susceptible S. aureus isolates were obtained from blood cultures and the explanted pacemaker wire. The isolates were characterized by: standard typing methods, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, auxotrophic profiling, proliferation assays, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, as well as whole genome sequencing. The isolated SCVs demonstrated a vancomycin-susceptible but dalbavancin non-susceptible and teicoplanin-resistant phenotype whereof the respective MICs of the last isolate were 16- and 84-fold higher than the susceptible strains. All four strains were indistinguishable or at least closely related by standard typing methods (spa, MLST, and PFGE), and whole genome sequencing revealed only eight sequence variants. A consecutive increase in cell wall thickness (up to 2.1-fold), an impaired cell separation with incomplete or multiple cross walls and significantly reduced growth rates were observed in the present study. Therefore, the mutations in pbp2 and the DHH domain of GdpP were identified as the most probable candidates due to their implication in the biosynthesis and metabolism of the staphylococcal cell wall. For the first time, we demonstrated in vivo induced dalbavancin non-susceptible/teicoplanin resistant, but vancomycin and daptomycin susceptible S. aureus SCVs without lipopeptide or glycopeptide pretreatment, thus, indicating the emergence of a novel lipoglycopeptide resistance mechanism.

Clinical features, treatment and outcome of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the ocular adnexa: single center experience of 60 patients.

BACKGROUND: Orbital marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (OAML) constitutes for the most frequent diagnosis in orbital lymphoma. Relatively little data, however, have been reported in larger cohorts of patients staged in a uniform way and no therapy standard exists to date. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have retrospectively analyzed 60 patients diagnosed and treated at our institution 1999-2012. Median age at diagnosis was 64 years (IQR 51-75) and follow-up time 43 months (IQR 16-92). All patients had undergone uniform extensive staging and histological diagnosis was made by a reference pathologist according to the WHO classification. RESULTS: The majority of patients presented with stage IE (n = 40/60, 67%), three had IIE/IIIE and the remaining 17 stage IVE. Seven patients with IVE had bilateral orbital disease whereas the others showed involvement of further organs. Treatment data were available in 58 patients. Local treatment with radiotherapy (14/58, 24%) or surgery (3/58, 5%) resulted in response in 82% of patients. A total of 26 patients (45%) received systemic treatment with a response rate of 85%. Nine patients received antibiotics as initial therapy; response rate was 38%. Watchful-waiting was the initial approach in 6/58 patients. In total 28/58 patients (48%) progressed and were given further therapy. Median time-to-progression in this cohort was 20 months (IQR 9-39). There was no difference in time-to-progression after first-line therapy between the different therapy arms (p = 0.14). Elevated beta-2-microglobulin, plasmacytic differentiation, autoimmune disorder and site of lymphoma were not associated with a higher risk for progress. CONCLUSION: Our data underscore the excellent prognosis of OAML irrespective of initial therapy, as there was no significant difference in time-to-progression and response between local or systemic therapy. In the absence of randomized trials, the least toxic individual approach should be chosen for OAML.