Assessing the post-treatment therapeutic effect of tongxie in irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

Diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly relapsing gastrointestinal disorder decreasing the quality of life. Existing studies indicated that the therapeutic effects maintained for a period of time after the treatments were discontinued (post-treatment therapeutic effects or PTTE). In this study, we aim to assess the PTTE of tongxie. We performed a multiple center, controlled, double blind study of patients with IBS randomized to tongxie (n = 120) or placebo (n = 120) for 4 weeks and followed up for 57 weeks. The primary outcomes were abdominal pains and stool consistency. The secondary outcomes were pain frequency and stool frequency. Tertiary outcomes were adverse effects and global overall symptom. The outcome data were collected at days 1, 2, 3, weeks 1 and 4 during the treatment and at days 1, 2, 3, until week 57 during the post-treatment. Significantly more patients receiving tongxie were clinical responders to the primary and secondary endpoints from day 1 until the end of the treatment. The positive effects of tongxie were maintained until 17-25 weeks after tongxie was discontinued. The relapse-free probabilities in the tongxie group were significantly higher than those in the placebo group (P < .001). Twenty-five weeks after the therapies were discontinued could be considered as IBS natural history. During this period, an average of 53.8-56.3% of patients (pool tongxie and placebo data together) had IBS symptoms (pain scale ≥ 3, stool consistency ≥ 5). In particular, at the end of this study (week 61), 145 (54.2%) patients had IBS symptoms. Our results provide clinical insights into efficient and cost-effective management of refractory IBS, and lend support to the IBS management that the selection of a therapy should consider both its effectiveness during treatment and its PTTE after the treatment.

Are personalized tongxie formula based on diagnostic analyses more effective in reducing IBS symptoms?-A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy and safety ofpersonalized tongxie formulas; to decrease type II errors to minimum. METHODS: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) into three groups given tongxie, placebo, or pinaverium 3 times daily for 4 weeks. Patients in the tongxie group were treated with personalized formulas based on TCM differential diagnosis, i.e., basic type of IBS, IBS due to liver depression and qi stagnation, excess heat in the liver, deficient spleen function, deficient kidney function, and others (groups 1-6). Primary endpoints were significantly greater reductions in abdominal pain and Bristol stool score. Secondary endpoints were reductions in pain and stool frequencies and abdominal discomfort and its frequency. RESULTS: There were significantly more patients whose stool consistencies were improved than pains were relieved in the entire population (p < 0.001), but there was no significantly difference in subpopulation group 3 (p > 0.05). There were significantly more patients whose stool frequencies were reduced than pain frequencies were reduced in the entire population (p < 0.001), but there were no significantly difference in the subpopulation Groups 1, 3, 4, and 6 (p > 0.05). Multiple active ingredients and their mechanisms of actions to relieve IBS symptoms were identified. CONCLUSION: The outcomes in subpopulations may be different from those of the entire population, indicating that personalized formulas are important to achieve optimal outcomes; the active ingredients and innovative mechanisms identified in this study can be the candidates for developing new IBS drugs, and used to manage IBS, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01641224 (www.ClinicalTrials.gov).

Tongxie Formula Reduces Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, yet few drugs are effective in reducing symptoms. Approximately 50% of patients with IBS attempt herbal therapy at least once. We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of the herb formulation tongxie vs placebo or pinaverium (an antispasmodic agent) in reducing symptoms of IBS. METHODS: We performed a trial of 1044 adult patients with IBS (based on Rome III criteria) at 5 hospitals in China, from August 2012 through January 2015. Subjects were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to groups given tongxie (a combination of A macrocephalae, P lactiflora, C reticulata, S divaricata, C pilosula, C wenyujin, C medica, and P cocos, along with other herbs, based on patient features), placebo, or pinaverium (50 mg tablets) 3 times daily for 4 weeks. Primary end points were significantly greater reductions in abdominal pain and Bristol stool score (before vs after the 4-week study period) in patients given tongxie compared with patients given placebo or pinaverium. Secondary end points were reductions in pain and stool frequencies and abdominal discomfort and its frequency. RESULTS: Subjects given tongxie had significant reductions, before vs after the study period, in all 6 symptoms assessed, compared to patients given placebo (P < .001). A significantly higher proportion of patients given tongxie had increased stool consistency (75.6%) than patients given pinaverium (50.6%), and a significantly higher proportion of patients given tongxie had fewer daily stools (72.7%) than subjects given pinaverium (58.3%) (P < .001 for both). However, significantly higher proportions of patients given pinaverium had reduced pain (63.5%) and pain frequency (69.5%) than patients given tongxie (51.4% and 58.6%, respectively; P < .005 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial of patients with IBS in China, we found 4 weeks of tongxie to produce significantly greater reduction in symptoms than placebo, and greater increases in stool consistency and reductions in stool frequency, than patients given pinaverium. Tongxie can therefore be considered an effective alternative therapy for patients with IBS who do not respond well to conventional therapies. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01641224.

Efficacy of Gastrosis No.1 compound on functional dyspepsia of spleen and stomach deficiency-cold syndrome: a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of Gastrosis No.1 compound in the treatment of functional dyspepsia with Spleen (Pi) and Stomach (Wei) deficiency-cold syndrome. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in 5 centers. Patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) of Spleen-deficiency and qi-stagnation syndrome (162 cases) were randomly assigned to groups given Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) Gastrosis No.1 compound or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. This trial included a 4-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up period. The outcomes were the dyspepsia symptom scores (measured by total dyspepsia symptom scale and single dyspepsia symptom scale) and syndromes of traditional Chinese medicine score (measured by traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scale). The outcomes were noted at weeks 0, 4 and 8. RESULTS: Compared with patients in the placebo group, patients in the CHM group showed significant improvement in the dyspepsia symptom scores as rated by patients and investigators (P <0.01), and also showed improvement in syndromes of traditional Chinese medicine score (P <0.01). No serious adverse event was reported. Safety tests obtained after 4 weeks of treatment showed no abnormal values. CONCLUSION: CHM Gastrosis No.1 compound was effective and safe in the treatment of functional dyspepsia with Spleen and Stomach deficiency-cold syndrome.

[Jinghuaweikang gelatin pearls plus proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimen in the treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis with Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the efficacy of Jinghuaweikang gelatin pearls plus proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple regimen in the treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) patients with Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection. METHODS: For this multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study, 90 patients of endoscopically confirmed CAG with positive H.pylori ((13)C or (14)C-urea breath test (UBT) or rapid urease test) were enrolled. There were 46 males and 44 females with an age range of (54 ± 10) years. None of them had H.pylori eradication background. They were randomly divided into 2 groups, Group LACJ (n = 45) received lansoprazole 30 mg+amoxicillin 1000 mg+clarithromycin 500 mg + jinghuaweikang gelatin pearls 240 mg, twice daily, for 10 days (d1-10) plus another 14 days (d11-24) only with jinghuaweikang gelatin pearls 240 mg, twice daily. Group LACB (n = 45) had standard quadruple regimen treatment: lansoprazole 30 mg+amoxicillin 1000 mg+clarithromycin 500 mg+bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, twice daily for 10 days (d1-10). The status of H.pylori was detected by (13)C-UBT at least 28 days after therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rates in Groups LACJ and LACB were as follows: per-protocol (PP): 70.5% (31/44) and 83.3% (35/42), intention-to-treat (ITT): 68.9% (31/45) and 77.8% (35/45) (both P > 0.05). The symptomatic improvements of bloating in upper abdomen, belching and epigastric pain after treatment in both groups. And those in Group LACJ was higher than those of Group LACB, but no statistical difference existed between two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of LACJ for the treatment of CAG patients with H.pylori infection is similar to LACB. And the symptomatic improvement of patients is better than LACB.