Radiotherapy and hyperthermia for breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of combined radiotherapy (RT) and hyperthermia (HT) in a large mono-institutional cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients affected by recurrent, newly diagnosed non-resectable or high risk resected tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of BC patients treated with RT + HT between 1995 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. RT doses of 50-70 Gy concurrent to a twice per week superficial HT were applied. For HT, a temperature between 41 and 42 °C was applied for approximately 1 h. Primary endpoint was local control (LC), secondary endpoints comprised toxicity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 191 patients and 196 RT + HT treatments were analyzed. In 154 cases (78.6%) RT + HT was performed for patients with recurrent BC. Among these, 93 (47.4% of the entire cohort) had received RT prior to RT + HT. Median follow up was 12.7 years. LC at 2, 5, and 10 years was 76.4, 72.8, and 69.5%, respectively. OS at 2, 5, and 10 years was 73.5, 52.3, and 35.5%, respectively. PFS at 2, 5, and 10 years was 55.6, 41, and 33.6%, respectively. Predictive factors for LC were tumor stage, distant metastases, estrogen/progesterone receptor expression, resection status and number of HT fractions. At multivariate analysis tumor stage and receptor expression were significant. No acute or late toxicities higher than grade 3 were observed. CONCLUSION: Combined RT + HT offers long-term high LC rates with acceptable toxicity for patients with recurrent, newly diagnosed non-resectable or resected BC at high risk of relapse.

A multi-institution study: comparison of the heating patterns of five different MR-guided deep hyperthermia systems using an anthropomorphic phantom.

INTRODUCTION: Within the hyperthermia community, consensus exists that clinical outcome of the treatment radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy plus hyperthermia (i.e. elevating tumor temperature to 40 - 44 °C) is related to the applied thermal dose; hence, treatment quality is crucial for the success of prospective multi-institution clinical trials. Currently, applicator quality assurance (QA) measurements are implemented independently at each institution using basic cylindrical phantoms. A multi-institution comparison of heating quality using magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) and anatomical representative anthropomorphic phantoms provides a unique opportunity to obtain novel QA insights to facilitate multi-institution trial evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Perform a systematic QA procedure to compare the performance of MR-compatible hyperthermia systems in five institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Anthropomorphic phantoms, including pelvic and spinal bones, were produced. Clinically relevant power of 600 watts was applied for ∼12 min to allow for 8 sequential MR-scans. The 3D-heating distribution, steering capabilities, and presence of off-target heating were analyzed. RESULTS: The evaluated devices show comparable heating profiles for centric and eccentric targets. The differences observed in the 3D-heating profiles are the result of variations in the exact phantom positioning and applicator characteristics, whereby positioning of the phantom followed current ESHO-QA guidelines. CONCLUSION: Anthropomorphic phantoms were used to perform QA-measurements of MR-guided hyperthermia systems operating in MR-scanners of different brands. Comparable heating profiles are shown for the five evaluated institutions. Subcentimeter differences in position substantially affected the results when evaluating the heating patterns. Integration of advanced phantoms and precise positioning in QA-guidelines should be evaluated to guarantee the best quality patient care.

Radiotherapy and hyperthermia with curative intent in recurrent high risk soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy before or after resection is one of the pillars of treatment for localised high risk soft tissue sarcomas. Treatment intensification has been described with concurrent chemotherapy and hyperthermia. The aim of this study is to assess local control after multimodal treatment, focussing on the treatment of local recurrences after surgery only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 42 patients treated in a prospective protocol with radiotherapy and hyperthermia, nine were treated for isolated local recurrences without metastatic spread. Most patients were treated with trimodal therapy including chemotherapy with ifosfamide and underwent resection whenever possible. Median follow-up was 1.4 years. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated. Estimated disease free survival, distant metastases free survival and local control for the whole cohort after 1.5 years were 66, 73 and 88%, respectively. Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant treatment influenced local control with a trend to statistical significance. Resection status did not influence local control. The cohort of patients treated for local recurrence after surgery alone had a significantly impaired local control compared to multimodal treatment at primary diagnosis (100 vs. 52%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With multimodal therapy including radiotherapy and hyperthermia local tumour control is achievable even in locally recurrent tumours. The clear-cut difference of the treatment of local recurrence in contrast to primary diagnosis might either reflect difficulties in diagnosis and treatment of local recurrences or biological aggressiveness of recurrent tumours. However, we recommend to consider multimodal treatment at primary diagnosis of high risk soft tissue sarcomas.

Quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials : II. Technical requirements for heating devices.

Quality assurance (QA) guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical trials with uniform quality hyperthermia treatments. This document outlines the requirements for appropriate QA of all current superficial heating equipment including electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive), ultrasound, and infrared heating techniques. Detailed instructions are provided how to characterize and document the performance of these hyperthermia applicators in order to apply reproducible hyperthermia treatments of uniform high quality. Earlier documents used specific absorption rate (SAR) to define and characterize applicator performance. In these QA guidelines, temperature rise is the leading parameter for characterization of applicator performance. The intention of this approach is that characterization can be achieved with affordable equipment and easy-to-implement procedures. These characteristics are essential to establish for each individual applicator the specific maximum size and depth of tumors that can be heated adequately. The guidelines in this document are supplemented with a second set of guidelines focusing on the clinical application. Both sets of guidelines were developed by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO) Technical Committee with participation of senior Society of Thermal Medicine (STM) members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.

Long-term local control and survival after preoperative radiochemotherapy in combination with deep regional hyperthermia in locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of deep regional hyperthermia on long-term local control and survival in locally advanced non-metastatic rectal cancer. METHODS: In total 103 patients with locally advanced non-metastatic rectal cancer were treated preoperatively with either neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy alone (n = 43) or the same treatment with additional deep regional hyperthermia (n = 60). The two groups were compared with respect to local control, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: Patients receiving additional hyperthermia had excellent long-term local control with a 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of 98% compared with 87% in the radiochemotherapy only group (p = 0.09). Five-year rates for OS (88% versus 76%, p = 0.08), DFS (77% versus 73%, p = n.s.) and DMFS (75% versus 77%, p = n.s.) were not statistically different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Radiochemotherapy combined with hyperthermia results in excellent long-term local control.

Regional hyperthermia and moderately dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Protocol of a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Current studies on salvage radiotherapy (sRT) investigate timing, dose-escalation and anti-hormonal treatment (ADT) for recurrent prostate cancer. These approaches could either be limited by radiation-related susceptibility of the anastomosis or by suspected side-effects of long-term ADT. A phase II protocol was developed to investigate the benefit and tolerability of regional hyperthermia with moderately dose-escalated radiotherapy. METHODS: The study hypothesis is that radio-thermotherapy is a safe and feasible salvage treatment modality. The primary endpoint is safety measured by frequency of grade 3+ genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AE) according to Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 4. Feasibility is defined by number of hyperthermia treatments (n ≥ 7) and feasibility of radiotherapy according to protocol. Target volume delineation is performed according to the EORTC guidelines. Radiation treatment is administered with single doses of 2 Gy 5×/week to a total dose of 70 Gy. Regional hyperthermia is given 2×/week to a total of 10 treatments. RESULTS: European centres participate in the phase II trial using intensity modulated RT (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc technique (VMAT). The initiating centres were participants of the SAKK 09/10 study, where the same patient criteria and target volume definition (mandatory successful performed dummy run) were applied insuring a high standardisation of the study procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The introduced phase II study implements highly precise image-guided radiotherapy and regional hyperthermia. If the phase II study is found to be safe and feasible, a multicenter phase III study is planned to test whether the addition of regional hyperthermia to dose-intensified sRT improves biochemical control.

Pathological complete response and sphincter-sparing surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with regional hyperthermia for locally advanced rectal cancer compared with radiochemotherapy alone.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of regional hyperthermia on rates of complete pathological response (pCR) and sphincter-sparing surgery in the context of an up-to-date radiochemotherapy protocol for locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2010, 106 patients with locally advanced cancer of the middle and lower rectum were admitted to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy either with (n = 61) or without (n = 45) regional hyperthermia. A retrospective comparison was performed between two groups: 45 patients received standard treatment consisting of 5040 cGy in 28 fractions to the pelvis and 5-fluorouracil (RCT group) and 61 patients received the same treatment in combination with regional hyperthermia (HRCT group). Target temperature was 40.5°C for at least 60 min. Total mesorectal excision was performed routinely. RESULTS: pCR was seen in 6.7% of patients in the RCT group and 16.4% in the HRCT group. Patients who received at least four hyperthermia treatments (n = 40) achieved a significantly higher pCR rate (22.5%) than the remaining 66 patients (p = 0.043). Rates of sphincter-sparing surgery were similar in both groups with 64% in the RCT group and 66% in HRCT. When considering only low-lying tumours located within 8 cm of the anal verge prior to treatment, the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery was 57% in the HRCT group compared with 35% in the RCT group (p = 0.077). CONCLUSION: The combination of regional hyperthermia and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy may lead to an increased pCR rate in locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients with low-lying tumours especially may benefit when additional downsizing allows sphincter-preserving surgery.

Quality assurance for clinical studies in regional deep hyperthermia.

BACKGROUND: A guideline is provided for the implementation of regional deep hyperthermia treatments under strict rules of quality assurance. The objective is to guarantee a comparable and comprehensible method in the treatment and scientific analysis of hyperthermia. The guideline describes regional deep hyperthermia (RHT) and MR-controlled partial body hyperthermia (PBH) of children, young and adult patients. According to this guideline, hyperthermia treatment is always applied in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. METHODS: The guideline is based on practical experience from several hyperthermia centers. The procedure allows applying jointly coordinated standards and quality control in hyperthermia for studies. RESULTS: The guideline contains recommendations for hyperthermia treatments, including indication, preparation, treatment, and standardized analysis.

Experimental thermoradiotherapy in malignant hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The human liver is known to be a relatively radiosensitive organ that develops clinically relevant late radiation hepatitis subsequent to whole liver treatment with total doses above 30 Gy in conventional fractionation. Experimental data, as well as clinical series, have demonstrated that hyperthermia of solid tumors in addition to radiotherapy enhances tumor growth inhibition and tumor control probability. We therefore developed an experimental model for combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia of the liver in transplantable rat Morris hepatoma 3924A. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cube of approximately 8 mm(3) was implanted subcapsularly into the middle liver lobe of 59 male syngenic ACI rats weighing approximately 180-200 g. On Day 16 after tumor implantation, irradiation of the tumor-bearing liver with either 0 Gy/25 Gy/35 Gy/45 Gy total dose in 10 fractions +/- hyperthermia (target temperature 40-42 degrees C) twice a week was initiated. Energy deposition was monitored by temperature probes in the liver and esophagus of the rats. Determination of tumor volume with magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 to 5 weeks after the end of therapy. The tumor growth rates could be estimated for 44 rats. If the growth rate was positive (37 rats), the inverse of the growth rate was interpreted as the time to 10-fold tumor volume. Otherwise the maximum observation time was considered as a censored value in a parametric survival analysis. RESULTS: Intrahepatic temperature probes showed a temperature plateau of greater than 40 degrees C after 5 to 8 min subsequent to initiation of hyperthermia. The target temperatures could be maintained for at least 22 min > or =40 degrees C and 10 min > or =41 degrees C, respectively. Median plateau temperature in liver, esophagus, and epicutaneously was 41.2 degrees C (standard deviation [SD] 0.7 degrees C; range 38.2 to 43.3 degrees C), 40.4 degrees C (SD 1.08 degrees C; range 38.9 to 41.8 degrees C), and 40.8 degrees C (SD 0.8 degrees C; range 38.2 to 42.7 degrees C), respectively. Elevation of the temperature in the esophagus correlated with intrahepatic temperatures in the range of 39-42 degrees C, r = 0.957. The increase in time to 10-fold tumor volume for each step of irradiation dosage was by 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20% to 49%) without hyperthermia and by 60% (95% CI 47% to 80%) with hyperthermia (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment outcome after experimental percutaneous thermoradiotherapy in intrahepatically implanted Morris hepatoma 3924A was related to total dose of irradiation and concurrently administered regional hyperthermia. An increased radiosensitivity due to hyperthermia (<42 degrees C) has to be assumed.