Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 113(1): 93-100.e3, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24836393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: MK-3641 is a short ragweed sublingual tablet under investigation for immunotherapy of ragweed pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the safety and tolerability of a ragweed sublingual tablet (Merck/ALK-Abelló) in ragweed-allergic adults with or without conjunctivitis. METHODS: Data from 4 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of MK-3641 (2 28-day and 2 52-week trials) were evaluated. Pooled analyses examined short-term safety over 28 days from all 4 trials and long-term safety from the 52-week trials. RESULTS: Across all studies, 757, 198, 454, and 1,058 subjects were randomized to placebo or 1.5, 6, or 12 Amb a 1-U of MK-3641, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were more frequent in the 6- and 12-Amb a 1-U MK-3641 groups than in the placebo group and were primarily local application-site reactions occurring in the first few days of treatment. There was no treatment-associated loss of asthma control or worsening of asthma associated with treatment. No swellings led to airway obstruction or respiratory compromise. No treatment-related anaphylactic shock, life-threatening, or serious treatment-related adverse events were reported for any MK-3641 dose. Of the 1,707 MK-3641-treated subjects, 1 systemic (anaphylactic) reaction was reported (0.06%). The 52-week long-term assessment was generally similar to the safety profile based on the 28-day assessment. CONCLUSION: MK-3641 doses up to and including 12 Amb a 1-U were well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. Sublingual immunotherapy risks such as worsening asthma or airway swellings that could cause airway obstruction were not observed. Systemic reactions and use of epinephrine were uncommon. In these studies, after the first dose was administered in a health care setting, self-administration was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01469182, NCT00783198, NCT00770315, and NCT00978029.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Antígenos de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/terapia , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Inmunoterapia Sublingual/métodos , Administración Sublingual , Adulto , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/análisis , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/complicaciones , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/inmunología , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/patología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/complicaciones , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/patología , Comprimidos
3.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 34(6): 534-41, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24169062

RESUMEN

Consistent medication delivery is critical for disease control including symptom management of allergic rhinitis (AR). Available aqueous intranasal corticosteroid devices lack an accurate dose (actuation) counter, which may lead patients to prematurely discard a unit or use a unit beyond its labeled number of actuations, therefore impacting patient adherence. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal aerosol, a nonaqueous hydrofluoroalkane formulation in a device with a novel integrated dose counter and an established efficacy/safety profile, was approved to treat AR-associated nasal symptoms in adolescent and adult patients. This study was designed to evaluate performance of the BDP nasal aerosol device with an integrated dose counter in perennial AR (PAR) patients. In a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in PAR patients (≥12 years), patients were randomized to receive once-daily BDP nasal aerosol at 320 micrograms or placebo. In addition to assessing the primary efficacy end point, patients evaluated the performance of the device and reliability, accuracy, and functionality of the dose counter. Concordance between daily patient-reported actuations and dose counter readings was assessed by classifying discrepancies into four categories: "fire not count," "count not fire," "count unknown fire," and "count up unknown fire." Analysis was performed for the total device completer population (n = 374), which included all randomized patients completing ≥80% of actuations during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Low discrepancy rates were shown for all discrepancy categories. Of 41,891 patient-reported actuations, only 159 discrepancies (diary versus counter) were noted, resulting in an overall discrepancy rate of 0.38 per 100 actuations. The medically important discrepancy rate of "fire not count" was low (0.09 per 100 actuations). Overall, 79.1% of patients reported zero discrepancies, 9.4% reported one discrepancy, and 6.4% reported two discrepancies. These results showed the functionality and reliability of the BDP nasal aerosol device with an integrated dose counter in a clinical setting. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01134705.).


Asunto(s)
Beclometasona/administración & dosificación , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Aerosoles , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Beclometasona/efectos adversos , Niño , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA