RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We investigated whether selenium supplementation improves quality-of-life (QoL) in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis (ID:NCT02013479). METHODS: We included 412 patients ≥18 years with serum thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) level ≥100 IU/mL in a multicentre double-blinded randomised clinical trial. The patients were allocated 1:1 to daily supplementation with either 200 µg selenium as selenium-enriched yeast or matching placebo tablets for 12 months, as add-on to levothyroxine (LT4) treatment. QoL, assessed by the Thyroid-related Patient-Reported-Outcome questionnaire (ThyPRO-39), was measured at baseline, after six weeks, three, six, 12, and 18 months. RESULTS: In total, 332 patients (81%) completed the intervention period, of whom 82% were women. Although QoL improved during the trial, no difference in any of the ThyPRO-39 scales was found between the selenium group and the placebo group after 12 months of intervention. In addition, employing linear mixed model regression no difference between the two groups was observed in the ThyPRO-39 composite score (28.8 [95%CI:24.5-33.6] and 28.0 [24.5-33.1], respectively; P=0.602). Stratifying the patients according to duration of the disease at inclusion, ThyPRO-39 composite score, TPOAb level, or selenium status at baseline did not significantly change the results. TPOAb levels after 12 months of intervention were lower in the selenium group than in the placebo group (1995 [95%CI:1512-2512] vs. 2344 kIU/L [1862-2951]; P=0.016) but did not influence LT4 dosage or free triiodothyronine/free thyroxin ratio. CONCLUSION: In hypothyroid patients on LT4 therapy due to autoimmune thyroiditis, daily supplementation with 200 µg selenium or placebo for 12 months improved QoL to the same extent.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the effect of Electromyography (EMG)-biofeedback guided exercises (BIONEX) on shoulder pain and function in participants with subacromial pain syndrome (SPS). METHODS: Twenty-five women and 24 men (19-67â¯years), diagnosed with SPS, were randomised to BIONEX or the same exercises without EMG-biofeedback (NEX). Primary outcome was shoulder pain during the past 7â¯days (Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)). Secondary outcomes included self-reported (Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)), and measured shoulder function (surface EMG from upper trapezius, lower trapezius and serratus anterior) in mean and ratios of % of maximum voluntary EMG (%MVE) and onset time (msec), during arm tasks with 0, 1 and 3â¯kg. RESULTS: There was no group difference (BIONEX versus NEX) in changed shoulder pain (NPRS, mean difference 0.18 (95% CI. -1.56; 1.19)), self-reported or measured shoulder function. Both groups, however, showed significant within-group improvements on self-reported outcomes (NPRS, DASH, OSS), only clinically relevant on NPRS (BIONEX 2.23 (SD 2.47); NEX 2.04 (SD 2.29)). CONCLUSION: BIONEX and NEX were both effective in reducing pain to a clinically relevant level, while EMG-biofeedback did not make a difference. The current neuromuscular shoulder exercise protocol is recommended.