Hypothalamic miR-30 regulates puberty onset via repression of the puberty-suppressing factor, Mkrn3.

Mkrn3, the maternally imprinted gene encoding the makorin RING-finger protein-3, has recently emerged as putative pubertal repressor, as evidenced by central precocity caused by MKRN3 mutations in humans; yet, the molecular underpinnings of this key regulatory action remain largely unexplored. We report herein that the microRNA, miR-30, with three binding sites in a highly conserved region of its 3' UTR, operates as repressor of Mkrn3 to control pubertal onset. Hypothalamic miR-30b expression increased, while Mkrn3 mRNA and protein content decreased, during rat postnatal maturation. Neonatal estrogen exposure, causing pubertal alterations, enhanced hypothalamic Mkrn3 and suppressed miR-30b expression in female rats. Functional in vitro analyses demonstrated a strong repressive action of miR-30b on Mkrn3 3' UTR. Moreover, central infusion during the juvenile period of target site blockers, tailored to prevent miR-30 binding to Mkrn3 3' UTR, reversed the prepubertal down-regulation of hypothalamic Mkrn3 protein and delayed female puberty. Collectively, our data unveil a novel hypothalamic miRNA pathway, involving miR-30, with a prominent role in the control of puberty via Mkrn3 repression. These findings expand our current understanding of the molecular basis of puberty and its disease states.

Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging and function in patients with growth hormone deficiency with and without mutations in GHRH-R, GH-1, or PROP-1 genes.

Pituitary stalk interruption and ectopic posterior lobe on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequently observed in patients with GH deficiency (GHD), but their pathogenesis remains controversial. We performed pituitary stimulation tests, MRI, and studied GH-1, GHRH receptor (GHRH-R), and Prophet of Pit-1 (PROP-1) genes in 76 patients with GHD. Of 33 patients with isolated GHD, 4 had GH-1 deletions and 4 had GHRH-R mutations; of 43 patients with combined pituitary hormone deficiency, 1 had PIT-1 and 5 had PROP-1 mutations. Compared with the 62 patients without mutations, 14 patients with mutations had higher frequency of consanguinity (57 vs. 2%, P < 0.001), familial cases (21 vs. 3%, P < 0.05), and lower frequency of breech delivery or hypoxemia at birth (0 vs. 39%, P < 0.005). On MRI, all patients with mutations had an intact stalk, whereas it was interrupted or thin in 74% without mutations (P < 0.001). The posterior pituitary lobe was in normal position in 92% of patients with mutations against 13% without mutations (P < 0.001). Among patients with combined pituitary hormone deficiency, hormonal deficiencies were of pituitary origin in all with PROP-1 and PIT-1 mutations and suggestive of hypothalamic origin in 81% without mutations. Perinatal insults were associated with thin/interrupted pituitary stalk, ectopic posterior lobe, and hypothalamic origin of hormonal deficiencies. In contrast, GH-1, GHRH-R, and PROP-1 mutations were associated with consanguineous parents, intact pituitary stalk, normal posterior lobe, and pituitary origin of hormonal deficiencies. We conclude that pituitary MRI and hormonal response to stimulation tests are useful in selection of patients and candidate genes to elucidate the etiological diagnosis of GHD.