RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Zoledronic acid (ZA) administered during the initial hospitalization for a fragility fracture improves the osteoporosis pharmacotherapy rate. Distinguishing the safety profile of inpatient ZA (IP-ZA) in this context is crucial if this approach is to be widely adopted. OBJECTIVE: To study the acute safety profile of IP-ZA. METHODS: An observational study of patients admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital with fragility fractures who were eligible to receive IP-ZA. Patients were treated with or without IP-ZA. Acetaminophen, either as a single pre-ZA dose or standing multiple-doses-per-day regimen for 48 hours or longer after ZA infusion, was also administered along with protocolized vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Changes in body temperature, serum creatinine, and serum calcium were measured. RESULTS: A total of 285 consecutive patients, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, are included in this analysis; 204 patients received IP-ZA. IP-ZA treatment was associated with a transient mean rise of body temperature of 0.31 °C on the day following its administration. Temperatures above 38 °C were seen in 15% of patients in the IP-ZA group and 4% in the nontreated group. Standing multiple-doses-per-day but not a single pre-ZA dose of acetaminophen effectively prevented this temperature increase. IP-ZA did not affect serum creatinine levels. Mean levels of serum total calcium and albumin-corrected calcium decreased by 0.54 mg/dL and 0.40 mg/dL, respectively, at their nadirs (Day 5). No patient experienced symptomatic hypocalcemia. CONCLUSION: IP-ZA along with standing multiple-doses-per-day acetaminophen, administered to patients in the immediate postfracture period, is not associated with significant acute adverse effects.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Fracturas Óseas , Humanos , Acetaminofén , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Calcio , Creatinina , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Fracturas Óseas/inducido químicamente , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Pacientes Internos , Ácido ZoledrónicoRESUMEN
In postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture, we previously reported that combined denosumab and high-dose (HD; 40 µg) teriparatide increased spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) more than combination with standard-dose teriparatide (SD; 20 µg). To assess the effects of these combinations on bone microarchitecture and estimated bone strength, we performed high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at the distal radius and distal tibia in these women, who were randomized to receive either teriparatide 20 µg (n = 39) or 40 µg (n = 37) during months 0 to 9 overlapped with denosumab 60 mg s.c. given at months 3 and 9, for a 15-month study duration. The 69 women who completed at least one study visit after baseline are included in this analysis. Over 15 months, increases in total BMD were higher in the HD-group than the SD-group at the distal tibia (5.3% versus 3.4%, p = 0.01) with a similar trend at the distal radius (2.6% versus 1.0%, p = 0.06). At 15 months, cortical porosity remained similar to baseline, with absolute differences of -0.1% and -0.7% at the distal tibia and -0.4% and -0.1% at the distal radius in the HD-group and SD-group, respectively; p = NS for all comparisons. Tibial cortical tissue mineral density increased similarly in both treatment groups (1.3% [p < 0.0001 versus baseline] and 1.5% [p < 0.0001 versus baseline] in the HD-group and SD-group, respectively; p = 0.75 for overall group difference). Improvements in trabecular microarchitecture at the distal tibia and estimated strength by micro-finite element analysis at both sites were numerically greater in the HD-group compared with SD-group but not significantly so. Together, these findings suggest that short-term treatment combining denosumab with either high- or standard-dose teriparatide improves HR-pQCT measures of bone density, microstructure, and estimated strength, with greater gains in total bone density observed in the HD-group, which may be of benefit in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Teriparatido , Densidad Ósea , Huesos , Denosumab , Femenino , Humanos , Radio (Anatomía)/diagnóstico por imagen , Teriparatido/farmacología , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
CONTEXT: In the Denosumab and High-Dose Teriparatide Administration (DATA-HD) study, we reported that 15 months of combined high-dose (HD) teriparatide and denosumab increased mean areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the hip and spine more than combined denosumab and standard-dose (SD) teriparatide. OBJECTIVE: In the current analysis, we compare the individual rates of aBMD response between the treatment groups. DESIGN: Single-site, open-label, randomized controlled trial in which postmenopausal women received either teriparatide 20-µg daily (SD) or 40-µg daily (HD) given months 0 through 9, overlapped with denosumab 60 mg, given months 3 through 15 (15 months' total duration). The proportion of participants in the SD and HD groups experiencing total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine aBMD gains of >3%, >6%, and >9% were compared. PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis completing all study visits (n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): aBMD (dual x-ray absorptiometry). RESULTS: At the end of the 15-month treatment period, a higher proportion of women in the HD group had aBMD increases >3% (83% vs. 58%, P = .037) and >6% (45% vs. 19%, P = .034) at the total hip, and >3% at the femoral neck (86% vs. 63%, P = .044). At the lumbar spine, >3% response rates were similar, whereas the >6% and >9% response rates were greater in the HD group (100% vs. 79%, P = .012 and 93% vs. 59%, P = .003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with the SD regimen, more women treated with the HD regimen achieved clinically meaningful and rapid gains in hip and spine aBMD. These results suggest that this approach may provide unique benefits in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Teriparatido/administración & dosificación , Absorciometría de Fotón , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello Femoral/efectos de los fármacos , Cuello Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/efectos de los fármacos , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the Denosumab and Teriparatide Administration (DATA) study, we showed that denosumab fully inhibits teriparatide-induced bone resorption while allowing for continued teriparatide-induced bone formation, resulting in larger increases in hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) than with either drug alone. We aimed to assess whether administration of denosumab with high dose teriparatide would stimulate larger increases in bone mass than those observed in the DATA study. METHODS: DATA-HD was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 4 trial done at Massachusetts General Hospital. Eligible women were postmenopausal women (at least 36 months since last menses or since hysterectomy with a follicle-stimulating hormone concentration of ≥40 U/L) with osteoporosis. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive teriparatide 20 µg (standard dose) or 40 µg (high dose) daily via subcutaneous injection for 9 months. At 3 months, both groups were started on denosumab 60 mg every 6 months via subcutaneous injection for 12 months. Areal BMD (aBMD) was measured at 0, 3, 9, and 15 months. Treatment was given open label, but outcome assessors were masked. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in spine areal BMD (aBMD) at 15 months. Women who completed at least one study visit after baseline were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02176382. FINDINGS: Between Oct 15, 2014, and June 10, 2016, 269 women were assessed for eligibility. 76 participants were randomly assigned to 20 µg teriparatide (n=39) or 40 µg teriparatide (n=37), of whom 69 completed at least one post-baseline visit. At 15 months, mean spine aBMD had increased to a significantly greater extent in the 40 µg group (17·5% [SD 6·0] increase) than the 20 µg group (9·5% [3·2]; difference 8·1%, 95% CI 5·5 to 10·6, p<0·0001). Mean femoral neck aBMD had also increased to a greater extent in the 40 µg group (6·8% [SD 4·1] increase) than the 20 µg group (4·3% [3·7]; difference 2·5%, 0·5 to 4·5, p=0·04), as did mean total hip aBMD (40 µg group, 6·1% [3·4] increase; 20 µg group, 3·9% [2·9] increase; difference 2·2%, 0·6 to 3·8, p<0·0001). 30 (77%) of 39 participants in the 20 µg group and 29 (78%) of 37 participants in the 40 µg group had an adverse event, and seven (18%) and two (5%) patients had serious adverse events. The most frequent adverse events were joint pain (15 [38%]), muscle cramp (15 [38%]), and fatigue (12 [31%]) in the 20 µg group group and fatigue (14 [38%]), nausea (16 [43%]), and joint pain (17 [46%]) in the 40 µg group. No deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Combined treatment with teriparatide 40 µg and denosumab increases spine and hip BMD more than standard combination therapy. This large and rapid increase in bone mass suggest that this high dose regimen might provide a method of restoring skeletal integrity in patients with osteoporosis. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and the Dart Foundation.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Denosumab/uso terapéutico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Teriparatido/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Resorción Ósea , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The public health implications of osteoporosis are enormous but the disease remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. In October 2018, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) convened a Pathways to Prevention (P2P) Workshop entitled "Appropriate Use of Drug Therapies for Osteoporotic Fracture Prevention" designed to identify research gaps, suggest future research opportunities, and advance the field through an evidence-based assessment. By design, the P2P report focused on "gaps" in our knowledge base. Unfortunately, however, the report did not sufficiently acknowledge the current evidence that unequivocally demonstrates the therapeutic efficacy of existing pharmacologic therapies for osteoporosis, which has the potential to exacerbate the current crises in osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/farmacología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Posmenopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Salud Pública , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data suggest that low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] increases insulin resistance and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Few interventional trials have assessed the effect of vitamin D on insulin metabolism, and published results are discordant. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to perform a detailed assessment of the effect of ergocalciferol administration on glucose and insulin metabolism in healthy people with low total 25(OH)D(total). DESIGN: This was a 12-wk, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. We enrolled 90 healthy volunteers aged 18-45 y with serum 25(OH)D ≤20 ng/mL (by immunoassay) and administered 50,000 IU ergocalciferol/wk or placebo for 12 wk. Primary endpoints were change in first-phase insulin response and insulin sensitivity as measured by intravenous glucose tolerance test. Secondary endpoints included change in homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; fasting glucose, insulin, and lipids; body mass index (BMI); and blood pressure. RESULTS: On-study 25(OH)D(total) was assessed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In the treated group, 25(OH)D(total) rose from 18 ± 7 to 43 ± 12 ng/mL (P < 0.001) with no change in the placebo group. Despite this increase, at 12 wk, there were no between-group differences in either insulin response or insulin sensitivity; nor were there differences in any measured secondary endpoints. There was no evidence of effect modification by sex, race, glucose tolerance status, baseline 25(OH)D(total), or BMI. CONCLUSION: In healthy persons with low 25(OH)D(total), ergocalciferol administration for 12 wk normalizes 25(OH)D(total) but does not improve insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, or other markers of metabolic health.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Ergocalciferoles/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Insulina , Insulina/metabolismo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/dietoterapia , 25-Hidroxivitamina D 2/sangre , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Boston/epidemiología , Calcifediol/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Ergocalciferoles/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Insulina/sangre , Secreción de Insulina , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/metabolismo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/fisiopatología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
CONTEXT: In postmenopausal osteoporotic women, denosumab fully inhibits teriparatide-induced bone resorption at approved doses. This property of denosumab is distinct from that of alendronate and likely contributes to the efficacy of combination denosumab and teriparatide therapy. Whether denosumab fully inhibits bone resorption when challenged by a higher dose of teriparatide is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define the comparative ability of denosumab and alendronate to block the acute proresorptive effects of high-dose teriparatide. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this randomized controlled trial, bone resorption (serum C-telopeptide [CTX]) was measured in 25 postmenopausal women prior to and 4 hours after a single 40-µg sc teriparatide injection. Subjects then received either a single injection of denosumab 60 mg or oral alendronate 70 mg weekly for 8 weeks. After 8 weeks, serum CTX was again measured before and 4 hours after a teriparatide a 40-µg injection. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the teriparatide-induced change in CTX from baseline to week 8. RESULTS: At baseline, 40 µg of teriparatide induced similar 4-hour increases in mean CTX in both groups (alendronate 47% ± 14%, denosumab 46% ± 16%). After 8 weeks, teriparatide was still able to stimulate bone resorption in women treated with alendronate (mean CTX increase of 43% ± 29%) but not in women treated with denosumab (-7% ± 11%; P < .001 for between group comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Denosumab, but not alendronate, fully inhibits the ability of high-dose teriparatide to increase bone resorption acutely. These results suggest that combining denosumab with a more potent anabolic stimulus may result in greater separation between bone resorption and formation and hence greater increases in bone mass.
Asunto(s)
Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Resorción Ósea/inducido químicamente , Resorción Ósea/prevención & control , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Teriparatido/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alendronato/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Denosumab , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/epidemiología , Teriparatido/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fibroblast growth factor 23 is a phosphate- and vitamin D-regulating hormone. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ergocalciferol administration on fibroblast growth factor 23 levels in healthy vitamin D-deficient subjects. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this 12-week trial conducted in a clinical research center, 18- to 45-year-old subjects (n=90) with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≤20 ng/ml (by chemiluminescent immunoassay) were randomized to weekly ergocalciferol treatment of 50,000 international units or placebo, while consuming a self-selected diet. Changes in fibroblast growth factor 23, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectroscopy), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and serum phosphate were measured. RESULTS: Mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D (P<0.0001), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (P=0.01), and fibroblast growth factor 23 (P=0.003) increased in the treatment versus placebo group. In the treatment group, 25-hydroxyvitamin D increased from 18 ± 7 to 40 ± 12 ng/ml at week 4 (P<0.0001) and remained stable at 43 ± 12 ng/ml at week 12 (P<0.0001); 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increased from 42 ± 17 to 52 ± 18 pg/ml at week 4 (P<0.001) and then remained stable, and fibroblast growth factor 23 increased from 43 ± 17 to 60 ± 33 pg/ml at week 8 (P=0.001) and 74 ± 42 pg/ml at week 12 (P<0.0001). Urinary phosphate excretion increased within the treatment group, but parathyroid hormone and serum phosphate were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Ergocalciferol administration increases circulating fibroblast growth factor 23. When measuring fibroblast growth factor 23, concurrent 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements should be obtained, because vitamin D deficiency may lower circulating fibroblast growth factor 23 levels.
Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Ergocalciferoles/administración & dosificación , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Boston , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Cromatografía Liquida , Femenino , Factor-23 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Humanos , Inmunoensayo , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Hormona Paratiroidea/sangre , Fosfatos/sangre , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina D/sangre , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/sangre , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Androstenedione is a steroid hormone and an intermediate in the synthetic pathway of both testosterone and estradiol in men and women. It is available without prescription and taken with the expectation that it may have beneficial effects on strength, general well-being, libido, and quality of life. Although studies have shown that oral androstenedione increases serum testosterone and estradiol levels in men, the hormonal effects of androstenedione in postmenopausal women are unknown. We randomly assigned 30 healthy postmenopausal women to receive 0, 50, or 100 mg androstenedione as a single oral dose. After androstenedione administration, we made hourly measurements of serum androstenedione, estrone, estradiol, and testosterone concentrations during 12 h of frequent blood sampling. The mean change (+/-SD) in serum androstenedione area under the curve (AUC) was greater in both the 50-mg (79 +/- 39%) and 100-mg dose groups (242 +/- 184%) than in the control group (-29 +/- 28%) (P < 0.0001 for controls vs. 50-mg group and controls vs. 100-mg group). The mean change in serum androstenedione AUC was also greater in the 100-mg than 50-mg dose group (P = 0.0026). The mean change in serum estrone AUC was greater in both the 50-mg (108 +/- 72%) and 100-mg dose groups (116 +/- 119%) than in the control group (-5 +/- 19%), although the control vs. 100-mg group comparison did not quite meet statistical significance (P < 0.0001 for controls vs. 50-mg group, P = 0.0631 controls vs. 100-mg group). The mean change in serum estradiol AUC remained stable after supplementation in all groups without any between-group differences observed (-11 +/- 17%, 2.8 +/- 34%, -11 +/- 27%, for the control, 50-mg, and 100-mg groups, respectively). The mean change in serum testosterone AUC was greater in both the 50-mg (185 +/- 146%) and 100-mg dose groups (457 +/- 601%) than in the control group (-27 +/- 13%) (P < 0.0001 for controls vs. 50-mg group and for controls vs. 100-mg group). The mean change in testosterone AUC was also greater in the 100-mg dose group than 50-mg dose group (P = 0.0257). There was considerable individual variability in the changes of serum androstenedione, estrone, and testosterone levels in the treated groups with peak serum testosterone levels exceeding the upper limit of normal in 4 of 10 women in the 50-mg dose group and 6 of 10 in the 100-mg dose group. We concluded that the acute administration of both 50-mg and 100-mg of androstenedione increases serum testosterone and estrone levels, but not estradiol levels, in postmenopausal women. If these hormonal effects are sustained during long-term administration, regular use of this supplement by postmenopausal women could thus cause both beneficial and adverse effects.