Comparison between linear and focal ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized trial.

AIMS: Findings regarding efficacy of substrate modification for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) are inconsistent. We prospectively compared clinical outcomes of complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided focal ablation (CFA) and CFAE-guided linear ablation (CLA) in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 150 patients with non-paroxysmal AF into CFA and CLA groups in a 1:1 ratio. Complex fractionated atrial electrogram distribution was evaluated using an automated algorithm of a three-dimensional mapping system. After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), CFAE-guided ablation was performed in the left atrium and then in the right atrium (RA). When compared with conventional CFA, CLA was performed based on conventional lines, with additional lines. Atrial fibrillation was not induced after PVI alone or with cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in 20.7% of patients. To achieve the endpoint, additional CFAE-guided RA ablation was required in 42.7% and 36.0% of patients undergoing CFA and CLA, respectively (P = 0.403). Atrial fibrillation was terminated during CFAE-guided ablation in 72.9% and 75.0% of patients undergoing CFA and CLA, respectively (P = 0.792). Termination of atrial tachycardia (AT) or non-inducibility of AF/AT was achieved in 61.3% and 68.0% of patients undergoing CFA and CLA, respectively (P = 0.393). The CLA group showed decreased 1-year freedom from AF/AT recurrence (60.0%, CFA vs. 47.3%, CLA; log rank P = 0.085), but no significant difference throughout the follow-up (22.2 ± 21.0 months) (67.1%, CFA vs. 68.9%, CLA; log rank P = 0.298). CONCLUSION: Long-term efficacy of CFAE-guided ablation was unaffected by the ablation technique in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Long-Term Clinical Comparison of Procedural End Points After Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Elimination of Nonpulmonary Vein Triggers Versus Noninducibility.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective for maintenance of sinus rhythm in 50% to 75% of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and it is not uncommon for patients to require additional ablation after PVI. We prospectively evaluated the relative effectiveness of 2 post-PVI ablation strategies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 500 patients (mean age, 55.7±11.0 years; 74.6% male) were randomly assigned to undergo ablation by 2 different strategies after PVI: (1) elimination of non-PV triggers (group A, n=250) or (2) stepwise substrate modification including complex fractionated atrial electrogram or linear ablation until noninducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmia was achieved (group B, n=250). During a median follow-up of 26.0 months, 75 (32.2%) patients experienced at least 1 episode of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after the single procedure in group A compared with 105 (43.8%) patients in group B (P value in log-rank test of Kaplan-Meier analysis: 0.012). Competing risk analysis showed that the cumulative incidence of atrial tachycardia was significantly higher in group B compared with group A (P=0.007). With the exception of total ablation time, there were no significant differences in fluoroscopic time or procedure-related complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of triggers as an end point of ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation decreased long-term recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia compared with a noninducibility approach achieved by additional empirical ablation. The post-PVI trigger test is thus a better end point of ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Relation between left atrial wall composition by late gadolinium enhancement and complex fractionated atrial electrograms in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: influence of non-fibrotic substrate in the left atrium.

The complex fractioned atrial electrogram (CFAE) has been considered as the catheter ablation target of left atrium (LA) under persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). We evaluated the relation between the LA wall composition by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) and the CFAE in patients with PeAF. Forty-three patients underwent LGE-CMR and CFAE mapping before catheter ablation for PeAF. The LA wall substrates were classified into three: the fibrotic, intermediate, and normal substrates by using two thresholds of 2 standard deviation (2-SD) and 6-SD above the mean signal from the normal myocardium. For each of 12 preselected LA wall regions, the composition ratios (CRs) of fibrotic, indeterminate, and normal substrates were calculated as a percentage to the volume of LA wall region, and compared depending on the CFAE, respectively. The CR of normal substrate was significantly greater at the LA wall region with CFAE (52 ± 38% vs. 20 ± 28%, P < 0.01) than without CFAE. In contrast, the LA wall region with CFAE showed significantly lower CRs of intermediate substrate (39 ± 34% vs. 57 ± 31%, P < 0.01) and fibrotic substrate (7 ± 17% vs. 21 ± 24%, P < 0.01) than did the LA wall region without CFAE, respectively. Thus, the high CR (>18%) of normal substrate predicted the CFAE at the corresponding LA wall region with 71% sensitivity and 62% specificity. In conclusion, the evaluation of LA wall normal substrate by LGE-CMR might be useful to predict the CFAE occurrence before catheter ablation of PeAF.

Atrial fibrillation cycle length as a predictor for the extent of substrate ablation.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) cycle length (CL) has been demonstrated to be one of the predictors for termination during ablation for AF. We evaluated the AF CL gradient between right atrium (RA) and left atrium (LA) and their mean AF CL in predicting the extent of substrate ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-six patients undergoing first ablation for persistent AF were studied. Stepwise ablation, sequentially in the following order: pulmonary veins (PV), LA, and RA, was performed to achieve AF termination. Stepwise ablation terminated AF in 110 patients (81%). In the AF termination group, AF was terminated by PV isolation (PVI) (Group P), PVI plus LA ablation (Group L), and PVI plus LA plus RA ablation (Group R) in 14 patients (13%), 49 patients (44%), and 47 patients (43%), respectively. Group R had much shorter mean AF CL than Group L (156 ± 18 vs. 174 ± 24 ms, P < 0.001) and mean AF CL in Group L was much shorter than Group P (174 ± 24 vs. 209 ± 36 ms, P = 0.004). The RA to LA AF CL gradient was not significantly different between left-side ablation (Group P + Group L) and additional RA ablation (Group R) (P = 0.177). Mean AF CL >180.50 ms predicted AF termination by PVI (Group P) with 79% sensitivity and 84% specificity while mean AF CL >165.25 ms predicted AF termination by left-side ablation (Group P + Group L) with 67% sensitivity and 75% specificity. After a mean follow-up of 15 ± 7 months, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence was significantly higher in left-side ablation (Group P + Group L) than additional RA ablation (Group R) (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION: Baseline mean AF CL may identify the subset of patients in whom persistent AF can be terminated by different extent of substrate ablation, which may in turn predict the chance of recurrence. However, baseline RA to LA AF CL gradient cannot predict the need for additional RA ablation.

Evaluation of quantification methods for left arial late gadolinium enhancement based on different references in patients with atrial fibrillation.

By using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging, we compared left atrial late gadolinium enhancement (LA-LGE) quantification methods based on different references to characterize the left atrial wall in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Thirty-eight patients who underwent three-dimensional LGE-CMR imaging before catheter ablation for AF were classified into three groups depending on their clinical AF type: (1) paroxysmal AF (PAF; n = 12); (2) persistent AF (PeAF; n = 16); and (3) recurrent AF after catheter ablation (RAF; n = 10). To quantify LA-LGE on LGE-CMR imaging, we used the thresholds of 2 standard deviations (2-SD), 3-SD, 4-SD, 5-SD, or 6-SD above the mean signal from the unenhanced left ventricular myocardium, and we used the full width at half maximum (FWHM) technique, which was based on the maximum signal from the mitral valve with high signal intensity. The 6-SD threshold and FWHM techniques were statistically reproducible with an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.7. On applying the FWHM technique, the normalized LA-LGE volume by LA wall area showed a significant difference between the RAF, PeAF, and PAF groups (0.22 ± 0.04, 0.16 ± 0.06, and 0.09 ± 0.03 mL/cm(2), respectively) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, most of the fibrotic scarring and low-voltage tissue on the electroanatomic map corresponded well with the extent of LA-LGE. The FWHM technique based on the mitral valve can provide a reproducible quantification of LA-LGE related to AF in the thin LA wall.

Relationship between complex fractionated atrial electrograms during atrial fibrillation and the critical site of atrial tachycardia that develops after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) are a substrate modification target in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, whether CFAEs can be also arrhythmogenic grounds of atrial tachycardia (AT) presenting after AF ablation remains to be determined. We investigated the relationship between CFAEs and the critical site of AT after CFAE-guided AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-two patients showing AT after pulmonary vein isolation and further CFAE-guided ablation were included. The termination sites of the 95 distinct ATs were annotated on color-coded CFAE cycle maps. Of the 95 ATs, 61 (64.2%) had a termination site at the border zone of CFAE or in a highly dense CFAE area. The cycle length (CL) of the ATs terminated in the CFAE area was significantly shorter than the CL of those terminated in the non-CFAE area. The cut-off CL for ATs terminated at the CFAE area was 270 milliseconds, with sensitivity/specificity of 70%/75%. In 67.2% of the ATs terminating at the CFAE-related area, the major termination sites were the anterior wall near the LA appendage, septum and roof, whereas the peri-mitral isthmus was the most common termination site of ATs in the non-CFAE area. CONCLUSIONS: The areas showing CFAE and their border zones were frequently associated with termination of ATs presenting after AF ablation. The mean CL of ATs originating near CFAEs was significantly shorter than that of those terminated in non-CFAE areas. The targeted CFAE areas also provided the arrhythmogenic milieu for AT developing after AF ablation.