Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BJOG ; 129(2): 301-312, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34651405

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of prenatal detection of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) following maternal primary infection in the first trimester within standard pregnancy follow-up or involving population-based screening (serological testing at 7 and 12 weeks of gestation), with or without secondary prevention (valaciclovir) in maternal CMV primary infection. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness study from the perspective of the French national health insurance system. SETTING: Cost-effectiveness based on previously published probability estimates and associated plausible ranges hypothetical population of 1,000,000 pregnant women. POPULATION: Hypothetical population of 1,000,000 pregnant women. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of detecting fetal cCMV in terms of the total direct medical costs involved and associated expected outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection rates and clinical outcomes at birth. RESULTS: Moving to a population-based approach for targeting fetal CMV infections would generate high monetary and organizational costs while increasing detection rates from 15% to 94%. This resource allocation would help implementing horizontal equity according to which individuals with similar medical needs should be treated equally. Secondary prevention with valaciclovir had a significant effect on maternal-fetal CMV transmission and clinical outcomes in newborns, with a 58% decrease of severely infected newborns for a 3.5% additional total costs. Accounting for women decision-making (amniocentesis uptake and termination of pregnancy in severe cases) did not impact the cost-effectiveness results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings could fuel thinking on the opportunity of developing clinical guidelines to rule identification of cCMV infection and administration of in-utero treatment. These findings could fuel the development of clinical guidelines on the identification of congenital CMV infection and the administration of treatment in utero. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: CMV serological screening followed by valaciclovir prevention may prevent 58% to 71% of severe cCMV cases for 38 € per pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Citomegalovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/sangre , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/economía , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/sangre , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/economía , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo
2.
Transplant Proc ; 45(4): 1603-7, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23726629

RESUMEN

Maribavir (MBV), a UL97 inhibitor, shows good oral bioavailability, low host cell toxicity, and theoretical benefits to inhibit cross-resistant viruses. We herein examined clinical and virological outcomes of 12 patients, including 3 bone marrow recipients and 9 organ recipients infected with resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) and treated with MBV during 2011-2012. All received at least 800-mg daily doses. They had developed clinical (12/12) and/or virological (11/12) resistance to CMV infection. Based on a decrease of viral load in blood >1.5 log copies/mL half of them responded to MBV treatment. The individual changes varied from a rapid decrease in viral load (n = 4) to no response (n = 3) with some late response slowly decreasing viremia (n = 3). In 2 cases MBV was used as secondary prophylaxis. No clear parameter emerged as a clinical surrogate for nonresponse to MBV. These results contrast with the lack of efficacy in phase III trials of MBV prophylaxis among stem cell recipients, which were possibly due to low doses or inadequate timing of drug initiation in the study. Additional clinical and surrogate laboratory markers are needed to determine antiviral responses to guide MBV use. Dosage ranging studies might benefit future MBV use.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Órganos , Ribonucleósidos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antivirales/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/farmacología , Citomegalovirus/efectos de los fármacos , Francia , Genotipo , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfotransferasas (Aceptor de Grupo Alcohol)/genética , Ribonucleósidos/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA