Improved Benefit Risk Profile of Rivaroxaban in a Subpopulation of the MAGELLAN Study.

Acutely ill medical patients are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related mortality during hospitalization and posthospital discharge, but widespread adoption of extended thromboprophylaxis has not occurred. We analyzed a subpopulation within the MAGELLAN study of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban to reevaluate the benefit risk profile. We identified 5 risk factors for major and fatal bleeding after a clinical analysis of the MAGELLAN study and analyzed efficacy and safety with these patients excluded (n = 1551). Risk factors included: active cancer, dual antiplatelet therapy at baseline, bronchiectasis/pulmonary cavitation, gastroduodenal ulcer, or bleeding within 3 months before randomization. We evaluated efficacy, safety, and benefit risk using clinically comparable endpoints in the subpopulation. At day 10, rivaroxaban was noninferior to enoxaparin (relative risk [RR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.15) and at day 35 rivaroxaban was significantly better than enoxaparin/placebo (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53-0.88) in reducing VTE and VTE-related death. Major bleeding was reduced at day 10 (RR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.07-4.44 vs 1.19, 95% CI = 0.54-2.65) and at day 35 (2.87, 95% CI = 1.60-5.15 vs 1.48, 95% CI = 0.77-2.84) for MAGELLAN versus this subpopulation, respectively. The benefit risk profile was favorable in this subpopulation treated for 35 days, with the number needed to treat ranging from 55 to 481 and number needed to harm from 455 to 1067 for all pairwise evaluations. Five exclusionary criteria defined a subpopulation of acutely ill medical patients with a positive benefit risk profile for in-hospital and extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban.

Benefits and risks of extended treatment of venous thromboembolism with rivaroxaban or with aspirin.

BACKGROUND: Full- or lower-dose anticoagulant therapy or aspirin can be used for extended therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but information on their relative benefit-risk profiles is limited. METHODS: Data from the EINSTEIN-CHOICE trial were used to compare the benefit-risk profiles of extended treatment with rivaroxaban (20 or 10 mg once daily) and aspirin (100 mg once daily) in VTE patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation therapy. One-year cumulative incidences of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were estimated and benefits and risks were calculated by determining the between group differences in a hypothetical population of 10,000 VTE patients treated for 1 year. FINDINGS: A total of 1107 patients were treated with 20 mg of rivaroxaban, 1127 with 10 mg of rivaroxaban, and 1131 with aspirin. The cumulative incidences of recurrent VTE in the rivaroxaban 20-mg, rivaroxaban 10-mg and aspirin groups were 1.9%, 1.6%, and 5.0%, respectively, whereas the cumulative incidences of major bleeding were 0.7%, 0.4% and 0.5%, respectively. The incidences of the combined outcome of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were 2.8% and 3.4% lower in the rivaroxaban 20-mg and 10-mg groups than in the aspirin group. For 10,000 patients treated for 1 year, there would be 284 (95% confidence interval [CI] 106 to 462) and 339 (95% CI 165 to 512) fewer events with rivaroxaban 20 mg or 10 mg than with aspirin. INTERPRETATION: Compared with aspirin, extended anticoagulation with once daily rivaroxaban reduces recurrent VTE with a favourable benefit-risk profile. FUNDING: Bayer AG.

Long-term Anticoagulation With Rivaroxaban for Preventing Recurrent VTE: A Benefit-Risk Analysis of EINSTEIN-Extension.

BACKGROUND: Short-term anticoagulant treatment for acute DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE) effectively reduces the risk of recurrent disease during the first 6 to 12 months of therapy. Continued anticoagulation often is not instituted because of the perception among physicians that the risk of major bleeding will outweigh the risk of new venous thrombotic episodes. METHODS: The authors performed a benefit-risk analysis by using the randomized EINSTEIN-Extension trial, which compared continued rivaroxaban with placebo in 1,197 patients with symptomatic DVT or PE who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation and in whom physicians had equipoise with respect to the need for continued anticoagulation. One-year Kaplan-Meier rates and rate differences of recurrent VTE and major bleeding were calculated. Benefits and risks were assessed using rate differences scaled to a population size of 10,000 patients treated for 1 year. RESULTS: Recurrent VTE occurred in eight recipients of rivaroxaban and 42 patients receiving placebo. In a population of 10,000 patients treated for 1 year, rivaroxaban treatment would have resulted in 665 (95% CI, 246-1,084) fewer recurrent VTEs than would placebo (number needed to treat = 15). Major bleeding occurred in four (0.7%) and zero patients, respectively. Rivaroxaban treatment would have resulted in 68 (95% CI, 2-134) more major bleeding events than would placebo (number needed to harm = 147). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed early recurrent VTE reduction with rivaroxaban that continued to improve throughout treatment; major bleeding increased gradually, plateauing at approximately 100 days. CONCLUSIONS: A clinically important benefit and a favorable benefit-risk profile of continued rivaroxaban anticoagulation was observed. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00439725; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Benefit-risk assessment of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolism is a common complication after major orthopedic surgery. When prescribing anticoagulant prophylaxis, clinicians weigh the benefits of thromboprophylaxis against bleeding risk and other adverse events. Previous benefit-risk analyses of the REgulation of Coagulation in ORthopaedic surgery to prevent Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (RECORD) randomized clinical studies of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty generally used pooled THA and TKA results, counted fatal bleeding as both an efficacy and a safety event, and included the active and placebo-controlled portions of RECORD2, which might confound benefit-risk assessments. We conducted a post hoc analysis without these constraints to assess benefit-risk for rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in the RECORD studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the safety population of the two THA and two TKA studies were pooled separately. The primary analysis compared the temporal course of event rates and rate differences between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin prophylaxis for symptomatic venous thromboembolism plus all-cause mortality (efficacy events) versus nonfatal major bleeding (safety events). Additionally, these rates were used to derive measures of net clinical benefit, number needed to treat (NNT), and number needed to harm (NNH) for these two end points. RESULTS: After THA or TKA, and compared with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban therapy resulted in more efficacy events prevented than safety events caused, with benefits exceeding harms early and throughout treatment and follow-up. Relative to enoxaparin, rivaroxaban treatment prevented six efficacy events per harm event caused for THA, with NNT =262/NNH =1,711. For TKA, rivaroxaban treatment prevented four to five efficacy events per harm event caused, with NNT =102/NNH =442. Sensitivity analysis that included surgical-site bleeding resulted in NNH =345 for THA and NNH =208 for TKA. CONCLUSION: In the RECORD studies, considering death, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, and major bleeding, rivaroxaban resulted in greater benefits than harms compared with enoxaparin. When incorporating surgical-site bleeding, rivaroxaban also results in greater benefit than harm for TKA and is balanced with enoxaparin for THA.